Economou Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 This never used to be the case, why the secrecy ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
internetjef Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 This never used to be the case, why the secrecy ? cards close to chest isnt it, think it stops future teams we are dealing with trying to work out how much cash we are willing to spend ive got no problem with it myself i suppose people knowing the fees puts additional pressure on players to justify them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 I think its mainly to protect their sell on value but all above reason's are definately valid.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red marc Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 This never used to be the case, why the secrecy ? if they told you they'd have to kill you!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economou Posted January 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 So how much do we think Woolford cost, 50K ? 100K ? 500K ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 So how much do we think Woolford cost, 50K ? 100K ? 500K ? probably more around 300/400k...money from Haynes transfer i'd guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 So how much do we think Woolford cost, 50K ? 100K ? 500K ? probably more around 300/400k...money from Haynes transfer i'd guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.