GrahamC Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 Does anyone reckon that any of those players offered contracts will turn them down? I think that I remember Edson saying yesterday that he thought Lee Peacock and Mickey Bell might reject their offers. I reckon Carey, Hill, Woodman, Aaron Brown and Bell will sign up and that Peacock and Joe Burnell will move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Mosquito Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 If only Danny Wilson would move on as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wesco Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 Who's going to want Burnell? he is going to get a better deal with City so why move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kit Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 two seasons ago Holloway was saying our only decent player was Burnell when they beat us 3-1 (although he was crap) maybe he could do us a favour and make him an offer of silly money. Although I think those comments were Holloways master plan of making us play Burnell all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThOmO Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 if hes out of contract why would holloway want to offer us a "pot of gold" for him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 Holloway is a damn good manager and an honest man who can see beyond the majority of clowns on this forum - Burnell is very good at his job and we could well have missed promotion because of his steely absence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartolona Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 With the amount of players out of contract this summer they'd be stupid not to resign unless they get better offers elsewhere and for some reason i can't see that happening! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThOmO Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 point being , no ones going to pay for an out of contract player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 It wouldn't bother me at all if Peacock or Bell rejected their respective offers. With both of them off the pay-roll there would be enough wage money to sign someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stevey2005 Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 does anyone rate cherno samba??obviously most of you know he was released by millwall (i think) and i know he was rated very highly does anyone know if hes any good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 Has anyone else noticed that peacock is the only player we've retained without a date for contract talks?? Hopefully he is in talks with other clubs and miller will get a chance next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.