Mahatma Coate Posted April 30, 2014 Report Share Posted April 30, 2014 Can anyone tell me why a badly behaved dog mentioned on this non league team's website: http://www.bristolrovers.co.uk/news/article/message-from-the-safety-office-1519637.aspx can cause this panic amongst the Neanderthals? http://www.brfcforum.co.uk/index.php?/topic/114808-rovers-reported-to-football-league-again/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted April 30, 2014 Report Share Posted April 30, 2014 Just a good natured pitch invasion, nothing to see here. The best fans in the world just showing passion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted April 30, 2014 Report Share Posted April 30, 2014 can cause this panic amongst the Neanderthals?http://www.brfcforum.co.uk/index.php?/topic/114808-rovers-reported-to-football-league-again/ Got about 4 lines into that thread before we were mentioned by some ****t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted April 30, 2014 Report Share Posted April 30, 2014 Kick the ***** out, I say ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin1988 Posted April 30, 2014 Report Share Posted April 30, 2014 Got about 4 lines into that thread before we were mentioned by some ****t. Unlike here obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Unlike here obviously. Sorry that you obviously didn't understand my post. I think its hypocritical for the OP (or Gas in general) to whine about a pitch invasion at AG by City fans when they are bitching about being reported to the FA for a pitch invasion by Gasheads at Wycombe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahatma Coate Posted May 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Sorry that you obviously didn't understand my post. I think its hypocritical for the OP (or Gas in general) to whine about a pitch invasion at AG by City fans when they are bitching about being reported to the FA for a pitch invasion by Gasheads at Wycombe. Yes but why pick on poor old "Rover"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i hate you butler Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Unlike here obviously.go forth and multiply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityloyal473 Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Sorry that you obviously didn't understand my post. I think its hypocritical for the OP (or Gas in general) to whine about a pitch invasion at AG by City fans when they are bitching about being reported to the FA for a pitch invasion by Gasheads at Wycombe. But there is a distinct difference between the pitch invasions, don't ya know? City's was a pitch invasion by thousands of marauding hooligans (gert Shidheads) intent on killing women and children, whilst the Sags was a expression of relief from the best fans in the world celebrating probably the biggest result in their history (beating Wycombe to avoid relegation to the conference). Sheesh, get with the programme will ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmpowell Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 The worst thing that can happen here is STBNLBR getting points deducted. No, hear me out.. If those pikey gypos are to be relegated, I want it to be based on their own failings. If they're relegated simply because of this, those inbred hoofwankers will bleat on about how unjust it was and irrelevant and how they're entitled their league status blah blah etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfcbs20 Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 ****k em OTIB CAF CTID oh City I love you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tall King Blox Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Just gotta love the missed man hug !......and then the ballet dancer appears stage right....brilliant ! http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/VIDEO-Bristol-Rovers-fan-celebrates-style-2-1-win/story-21023593-detail/story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipdawg Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Sorry that you obviously didn't understand my post. I think its hypocritical for the OP (or Gas in general) to whine about a pitch invasion at AG by City fans when they are bitching about being reported to the FA for a pitch invasion by Gasheads at Wycombe. I would gladly take a 3 point penalty on this seasons total if the same punishment were reflected on the Sags, as mentioned on their forum. In fact; make it 4 points... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zider67 Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 But of course it was all Wycombe's fault for not having proper barriers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFiGO!?! Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 The worst thing that can happen here is STBNLBR getting points deducted. No, hear me out.. If those pikey gypos are to be relegated, I want it to be based on their own failings. If they're relegated simply because of this, those inbred hoofwankers will bleat on about how unjust it was and irrelevant and how they're entitled their league status blah blah etc etc Their failings would be in an inability to control their supporters but they'd bleat injustice whatever way they were relegated so it'd make no difference anyway. Two major differences here, compared to their JPT 2007 'aggressive' as differentiated from 'passionate' pitch invasion is that firstly: the game was still in play thus disturbing the course of events and secondly, they were at somebody else's ground. Now, I remember Wycombe Wanderers being voted the league's most friendliest club (closely followed by the sags themselves of course ). I don't know if they still hold that award but I think anyone who's ever been there wouldn't begrudge them it if they did. Had R*vers conducted themselves like that at numerous other clubs then there would have been serious repercussions - as their previous form for this in 1996 demonstrated. I don't know these days if, say, they'd been in the bottom tear at Millwall that they would have had the bare-faced gall to have done it. Won't be a points deduction though, sadly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin1988 Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Sorry that you obviously didn't understand my post. I think its hypocritical for the OP (or Gas in general) to whine about a pitch invasion at AG by City fans when they are bitching about being reported to the FA for a pitch invasion by Gasheads at Wycombe. Both sides are pretty hypocritical in pretty much everything that gets said, let's be fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Both sides are pretty hypocritical in pretty much everything that gets said, let's be fair. I don't see many City fans claiming that we are whiter than white even though I think we've got a lot more to be proud of. When Gasheads talk about their support, very often, they paint themselves as super passionate, loyal, law abiding fans, which of course, they're not. Their criticism of pitch invasions at AG was massively hypocritical in view of the fact that they had done the same thing at the Mem in 2007. Their fans were also the first to encroach on the pitch in the Sky televised derby in 1997. A pitch invasion is a pitch invasion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zider67 Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 I don't see many City fans claiming that we are whiter than white even though I think we've got a lot more to be proud of. When Gasheads talk about their support, very often, they paint themselves as super passionate, loyal, law abiding fans, which of course, they're not. Their criticism of pitch invasions at AG was massively hypocritical in view of the fact that they had done the same thing at the Mem in 2007. Their fans were also the first to encroach on the pitch in the Sky televised derby in 1997. A pitch invasion is a pitch invasion. I think it is that "holier than thou" attitude from the sags that tends to get up the red half of the cities nose. We don't tend to hear anything from them about their fan's antics in Newport this season: iet the youtube video that shows them in the center of Newport singing "I'd rather be a p*k* than a t*ff" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New2City Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 A pitch invasion is a pitch invasion. I apologise in advance for my ignorance on this... but does it make a difference if you are invading your home pitch or the away pitch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 I apologise in advance for my ignorance on this... but does it make a difference if you are invading your home pitch or the away pitch? I wouldnt have thought so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFiGO!?! Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 I apologise in advance for my ignorance on this... but does it make a difference if you are invading your home pitch or the away pitch? I'll take this one and I have to disagree with my otib colleague. I would suggest that there is a significant difference between a one man band, for the sake of argument a streaker, entering the field of play 'for a laugh' during a pre-season friendly against, again, for the sake of argument Salisbury at home and 300 marauding visitors on the pitch at Millwall. The difference being the consequences and the likelihood of inducing further public disorder. The sags, imo, were fortunate in as much as they were guests at Adams Park and not one of the less passive hosts these shores have to offer. Fortune that wasn't on their side in 1996. Had the natives taken more of an offence, serious disorder may well have occurred and R*vers would now be in deep shit. But I'm happy to agree to disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 I'll take this one and I have to disagree with my otib colleague. I would suggest that there is a significant difference between a one man band, for the sake of argument a streaker, entering the field of play 'for a laugh' during a pre-season friendly against, again, for the sake of argument Salisbury at home and 300 marauding visitors on the pitch at Millwall. The difference being the consequences and the likelihood of inducing further public disorder. The sags, imo, were fortunate in as much as they were guests at Adams Park and not one of the less passive hosts these shores have to offer. Fortune that wasn't on their side in 1996. Had the natives taken more of an offence, serious disorder may well have occurred and R*vers would now be in deep shit. But I'm happy to agree to disagree Bloody hell, am I witnessing a difference in opinions without insults being thrown? On otib?!!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS34Red Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 I remember they invaded the pitch at AG, this of course caused much anger in the home stands. So them invading the pitch at Wycombe their relegation rivals may have caused a lot of trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 I'll take this one and I have to disagree with my otib colleague. I would suggest that there is a significant difference between a one man band, for the sake of argument a streaker, entering the field of play 'for a laugh' during a pre-season friendly against, again, for the sake of argument Salisbury at home and 300 marauding visitors on the pitch at Millwall. The difference being the consequences and the likelihood of inducing further public disorder. I read the original question to be if there is a difference 'in the eyes of the law'? I agree with you WTFiGO. I was annoyed after the JPT match in Sept when social meda was full of sanctimonious ****ts slagging off City fans whilst making out Rovers fans were perfect in their conduct. The atmosphere at the game turned noticeably more volatile after their sorry little rabble of wannabe hoolies arrived 15 mins into the match and made a bee line for City fans in the Williams (knowing full well the couldn't reach their target). Out of sight of the TV cameras but in full view of the rest of the ground. Acts like that and when some of them came on the pitch after Beadles equaliser in 96/97 doesn't excuse bad behaviour by City fans but it is really stupid behaviour that can ignite trouble. You cant 'give it large', like they do, and then complain about the consequences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted May 1, 2014 Report Share Posted May 1, 2014 Bloody hell, am I witnessing a difference in opinions without insults being thrown? On otib?!!?! Well, you can frack off, for a start! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gert Mare Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Invading the pitch is what sags do for a pastime as their players are so shit that they all think that they can play with more pride. They also love making V signs at "Sheeds", and because they can't be seen very well under the cover of the Eastend they have to spill onto the pitch and then proceed to blame City fans for starting it. It all stems from the pitch invasion when Beadle scored the late goal for them and they stormed the pitch celebrating like they had won the Champions League and then the. City fans retaliated and the club got fined. They were at it again in the Paint Pot Cup, and so we took the mickey in this season's match. (I particularly enjoyed the guy who slid on his knees towards the sags Solskjaer style, and the guy who did a Klinsmann). No doubt that come 4:50ish today they will be on the pitch celebrating again like it has been a day out at Wembley, or on the pitch tearing up the ground in an inferiority complex rage, before causing utter carnage in Gloucester Road as the Teddies come out the pram yet again. Personally, I hope to record BBC local news on Monday night watching them all booing and balling their eyes out with the club getting fined for their abhorrent behaviour, but sadly it is likely to be scenes of them hugging each other, punching the air and saying that it's the best day since Ricky Lambert scored "That goal". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityloyal473 Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 but sadly it is likely to be scenes of them hugging each other, punching the air and saying that it's the best day since Ricky Lambert scored "That goal". And telling everyone that next year is their season and that there is a shift in footballing power in Bristol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glynriley Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 And telling everyone that next year is their season and that there is a shift in footballing power in Bristol. A gasshole I was chatting to yesterday, reminded me that it was 24 years since they beat us at Trumpton. I'd love it if 24 hours after their favourite date, they lost their league status. It would have a certain symmetry. Even better if they lose 2-4 today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityloyal473 Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob k Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 I saw no problem with that pitch invasion, just a bit of passion which over spilled on to the pitch, we would have done exactly the Same. I can remember brookers goal a few seasons back in the FIRST game of the season that sparked a pitch invasion in the last minute!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.