Red-Robbo Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 This is confusing me slightly. Can someone remind me who the unpleasant one is: Robbored or Redrobbo? One attends gas matches and has an ongoing vendetta against Gary Johnson. (hint: that's not me) Actually I have nothing against Robbored Tbh. Seems an ok bloke and committed supporter, but on this occasion he's guilty of repeating urban myths - or perhaps I should say changing room myths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob k Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Ill ask "Flapper" later if ya like as im out for a drink with him....if he wants to discuss with you how you know this can you be contacted!!!!!! However in this instance it would not be his opinion that counts!! I can't imagine he would admit to being a bad apple would he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marina's Rolls Royce Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Red robbo and robbo red have opposite viewpoints. Their names are so similar I thought their viewpoints would be the same! They both work at Twix? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggythecity Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 However in this instance it would not be his opinion that counts!! I can't imagine he would admit to being a bad apple would he? I dont know him so well these days but i do know he seemed to get on pretty well with all of them all when i did know him,my point really was its hearsay that people say they have heard as always, if people can back up what they say fair enough....they usually cant though!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yardy Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Bad journalism in my opinion. All this was in the past and when this was happening there was many rumours circulating about who the bad apple could be. Why does Stockhausen feel the need to bring up this when the whole club is on the up, no need for negative rubbish that just tries to dig up crap from the past. I have a good mind to have my two pence worth with Stockhausen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Journalist Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Bad journalism in my opinion. All this was in the past and when this was happening there was many rumours circulating about who the bad apple could be. Why does Stockhausen feel the need to bring up this when the whole club is on the up, no need for negative rubbish that just tries to dig up crap from the past. I have a good mind to have my two pence worth with Stockhausen! Are you for real? He's using it as an example to demonstrate how united the current group is! PS. Apologies if you're on a wind-up. PPS. I'm not him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 This is confusing me slightly. Can someone remind me who the unpleasant one is: Robbored or Redrobbo? It's confusing me to. Whilst Red Robbo is my evil twin I didn't think he'd be so completely wrong earlier in this thread. I actually had several conversations with Phillips when he was at City and during said conversations he whinged and complained about being dropped for Basso and of course the manager at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yardy Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Are you for real? He's using it as an example to demonstrate how united the current group is! PS. Apologies if you're on a wind-up. PPS. I'm not him. No wind up here Andy, he could of used other examples to express his point, no need to s**t stir... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Journalist Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 I think it's a positive piece overall, no shit stirring involved. The mention of a previous bad apple is nothing more than a passing one. Either way, he's paid to be impartial, not to be a mouthpiece for the club. It's an opinion piece, which people may or may not disagree with, not poor journalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 It's confusing me to. Whilst Red Robbo is my evil twin I didn't think he'd be so completely wrong earlier in this thread. I actually had several conversations with Phillips when he was at City and during said conversations he whinged and complained about being dropped for Basso and of course the manager at the time. Have a conversation with any player who is dropped. Do you think any of them are thrilled? There's a bloody world of difference between that and bring "a bad apple" who is "disruptive". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipdawg Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Bad journalism in my opinion. All this was in the past and when this was happening there was many rumours circulating about who the bad apple could be. Why does Stockhausen feel the need to bring up this when the whole club is on the up, no need for negative rubbish that just tries to dig up crap from the past. I have a good mind to have my two pence worth with Stockhausen! I don't think it's bad journalism by Stockhausen, it's just very like this board to pick up on the one negative sentence in a largely very positive blog about our club! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.