Jump to content
IGNORED

Radio Bristol have just said...


CodeRed

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CodeRed said:

 

that they have contacted the club and asked for someone to come on RB and be interviewed about the situation......and the club'd response was that there is no one available to do this.

 

 

 

unbelievable - only at Bristol City

Maybe they are busy sorting out a new manger !! Hardly unbelievable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CodeRed said:

 

that they have contacted the club and asked for someone to come on RB and be interviewed........and the club'd response was that there is no one available to do this.

 

 

 

unbelievable - only at Bristol City

Surprised they didn't put David Lloyd forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Phileas Fogg said:

I think it is a bit strange that no one can possibly spend 5 mins talking to the local radio station.. Doesn't have to be SL 

time and a place. Sure quick appointment to be made soon and plenty of chances then to ask questions. Lets just get the new manger in first. Time of the essence!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spoons said:

time and a place. Sure quick appointment to be made soon and plenty of chances then to ask questions. Lets just get the new manger in first. Time of the essence!

I don't think it takes every single board member to be searching for a new manager. All that's required for RB is a 5 minute QnA about it.. Arguably they have a responsibility to do it anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CodeRed said:

 

that they have contacted the club and asked for someone to come on RB and be interviewed about the situation......and the club'd response was that there is no one available to do this.

 

 

 

unbelievable - only at Bristol City

Hardly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to remember that English football is largely in the hands of those who feel that their only accountability is to their own egos

 

Roll,on the day when City are a truly community run club answerable to its supporters and the wider community, including local radio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd have to ask what the media team are doing…RB has Adam Baker's number, there's Lisa Knights…can't imagine either of them are engaged in recruiting a new manager.

But the truth is, the powers that be don't consider themselves answerable and won't want to bother...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Griffin said:

Although understandable due to obviously being busy, the amount of time and money all of the supporters put into the club you'd think they could get someone to give us a bit of information, David Lloyd?

For the last time Lloyd is paid by Bristol Sport who have NOTHING to do with footballing matters at AG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone care to defend the board here over Cotterill, who faced the questions and criticism over a lack of strengthening while they remained largely silent, bar one interview where SL completely undermined his manager? He did not get the backing. Fact. The board are spineless. This is just another example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Robin1988 said:

Anyone care to defend the board here over Cotterill, who faced the questions and criticism over a lack of strengthening while they remained largely silent, bar one interview where SL completely undermined his manager? He did not get the backing. Fact. The board are spineless. This is just another example.

No. Opinion.  Did SL completely undermine SC or was it the other way around?  Why believe one over the other?  We can theorise all we like, but only a select few people know the truth, and the fact is that it's unlikely that (m)any of those people are on here.  

All we know for sure is that they were not singing from the same hymn sheet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Steve Watts said:

No. Opinion.  Did SL completely undermine SC or was it the other way around?  Why believe one over the other?  We can theorise all we like, but only a select few people know the truth, and the fact is that it's unlikely that (m)any of those people are on here.  

I'm not theorising anything. People talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Robin1988 said:

I'm not theorising anything. People talk.

I could do plenty of talking...doesn't make any of it true.  Unless you're directly involved in the running of the club anything else is hearsay.

I'm not taking one side over the other, I just don't state things as fact unless I know them to be true.  Could be SC didn't get the backing, could be he did. I don't know.  But putting "fact" into a post does not make it so!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, cynic said:

They probably haven't had time to get their story straight so everyone is singing from the same hymn sheet.

It probably came as a shock to everyone outside of the board room.

One wrong word and it could open up a can of worms.

 

 

This is undoubtedly correct. Adam Baker didn't sack Cotts, so before he or any of the media team can comment they will need to be briefed and an agreed form of words settled on.

Particularly if this wasn't planned, but cones in the wake of some big bust-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

This is undoubtedly correct. Adam Baker didn't sack Cotts, so before he or any of the media team can comment they will need to be briefed and an agreed form of words settled on.

Particularly if this wasn't planned, but cones in the wake of some big bust-up.

I agree,  I also think there was a bust up between the board and SC, probably over the fact that he couldn't get the players he wanted because of the capped wages policy. I am not ITK, but IMO that is what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Steve Watts said:

I could do plenty of talking...doesn't make any of it true.  Unless you're directly involved in the running of the club anything else is hearsay.

I'm not taking one side over the other, I just don't state things as fact unless I know them to be true.  Could be SC didn't get the backing, could be he did. I don't know.  But putting "fact" into a post does not make it so!

Depends who you talk to then doesn't it!

2 minutes ago, Fiale said:

You certainly like to - but never actually back it up with anything in numerous posts now.

What else do you want me to say? There's plenty of stuff in the public eye which backs up what I say. I'm not going to go into explicit private detail over how I've heard these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a slightly different note, I was listening to SAM FM this morning, and the breakfast presenter was saying the SC won't be missed by any of the media.

Apparently, SC belittled them a lot in front of other reporters and has even taken a couple of seasoned reporters outside and had a massive slanging and shouting match with them !!

I do wonder if SC has overstepped the mark one too many times recently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

Particularly if this wasn't planned, but cones in the wake of some big bust-up.

I reckon Cotterills dismissal was planned and had been so for a number of weeks.

The two final nails in his coffin was Tuesday defeat and the bust-up with the fans. That was game over for him.

Should a new man be appointed quickly then we'll all know that it was indeed planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

This is undoubtedly correct. Adam Baker didn't sack Cotts, so before he or any of the media team can comment they will need to be briefed and an agreed form of words settled on.

Particularly if this wasn't planned, but cones in the wake of some big bust-up.

Agreed Robbo, but they've had all night to work out what they'd say to the media today and in the absence of an official line on Cotts departure they allow everyone to speculate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, beaverface said:

On a slightly different note, I was listening to SAM FM this morning, and the breakfast presenter was saying the SC won't be missed by any of the media.

Apparently, SC belittled them a lot in front of other reporters and has even taken a couple of seasoned reporters outside and had a massive slanging and shouting match with them !!

I do wonder if SC has overstepped the mark one too many times recently?

He fell out with reporters more last season. At least some of them weren't 'seasoned'. He passionately defended his squad and was spiky if he felt they were being threatened by questions. Some of the best managers in history have done the same, so I wouldn't pass it off as a bad tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Robin1988 said:

He fell out with reporters more last season. At least some of them weren't 'seasoned'. He passionately defended his squad and was spiky if he felt they were being threatened by questions. Some of the best managers in history have done the same, so I wouldn't pass it off as a bad tactic.

Of course.

...I am speculating that, "maybe", he went too far on this occasion? Maybe it was to do with the Clough transfer? Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Robbored said:

I reckon Cotterills dismissal was planned and had been so for a number of weeks.

The two final nails in his coffin was Tuesday defeat and the bust-up with the fans. That was game over for him.

Should a new man be appointed quickly then we'll all know that it was indeed planned.

It's a bit of a conspiracy theory Robbored but I'm inclined to agree with you. A relaxation of the wage structure will be all the proof we need.

This goes back quite a while I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beaverface said:

...I am speculating that, "maybe", he went too far on this occasion? Maybe it was to do with the Clough transfer? Who knows.

His spiky demeanour internally was what lost him the day, but from people who couldn't hack it. You'd think the players' opinions mattered more, but evidently not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Robin1988 said:

Not to come out and represent the opinions of the people who fired SC when they would have had nothing to do with it.

Really?

I do this every day at work. 

Represent my organisation and explain corporate decisions that are made at a more senior level than me.

It is not uncommon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Gasbuster said:

Idiot on RB now saying Bristol is a rugby city, not a football city.

What with their 5k - 6k crowds ?

Laughable.

Well, that's what you get if you don't put anyone up to be interviewed…you let other people set the agenda.

The job of a media department is to manage the agenda...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Really?

I do this every day at work. 

Represent my organisation and explain corporate decisions that are made at a more senior level than me.

It is not uncommon.

They put out the statement - no one wants to hear from Adam Baker about why the decision was made. If anyone is coming out, it should be someone from the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Really?

I do this every day at work. 

Represent my organisation and explain corporate decisions that are made at a more senior level than me.

 

And keep an eye on Otib...:whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ivorguy said:

We have to remember that English football is largely in the hands of those who feel that their only accountability is to their own egos

 

Roll,on the day when City are a truly community run club answerable to its supporters and the wider community,

Once the ground is finished and all paid for. Oh, and a few more million chucked at someone to score goals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know why anybody is surprised, remember when they disgracefully sent Cotterill out alone to face the press when he was announced City manager?

If I remember rightly Lansdown then made some pathetic comment about how they didn't put any board members up to speak to the press as they felt they'd taken too much criticism over that period. If you didnt laugh you'd cry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CodeRed said:

 

that they have contacted the club and asked for someone to come on RB and be interviewed about the situation......and the club'd response was that there is no one available to do this.

 

 

 

unbelievable - only at Bristol City

In fairness they've probably got bigger fish to fry just now .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...