old_eastender Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 With Tammy out, surely, surely, LJ has to start with Djuric AND Taylor up front? Personally I'd like to see 3-5-2 or perhaps more of a 3-4-1-2, but whatever the formation has to be Djuric & Taylor up front together. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Heggler Tomlin Brownhill Bryan Taylor Djuric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 This formation bollox is getting on my nerves. 4-4-2 and go for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoons Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 15 minutes ago, Super said: This formation bollox is getting on my nerves. 4-4-2 and go for it. Agreed like derby away shit or bust! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC_Josh Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Giefer Vyner Wright Magnusson Golbourne Hegeler Brownhill Cotterill Tomlin Paterson Djuric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Notgetinya Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 4-4-2 is the only way to play in the championship when you have an average squad. The sooner the coaching staff realise this the better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 We have no RB so.. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Brownhill Hegler Bryan Tomlin Djuric Judas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 35 minutes ago, Super said: This formation bollox is getting on my nerves. 4-4-2 and go for it. Aye; our best 45 of the season so far was 442 - I hope we persist with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Thompson Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 We are only going to get out of this mess with clean sheets! Will fans accept that or are we going to booed for not being aggressive enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Wilde Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Geifer Vyner Flint Wright Golbourne Cotterill Hegler Tomlin Bryan Djuric Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh95 Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Giefer Wright Flint Mags Golbourne Cotterill Hegler Bryan Tomlin Djuric Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Rich Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 19 minutes ago, Matty Taylor [BCFC] said: We have no RB so.. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Brownhill Hegler Bryan Tomlin Djuric Judas I think that's probably about right, - sticking to 442 if Matthews is not fit will be tough. So I'd say either this or drop to Tomlin and have a back four of Vyner/Matthews Flint wright/mags Golbourne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Bong Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 5 hours ago, old_eastender said: With Tammy out, surely, surely, LJ has to start with Djuric AND Taylor up front? Personally I'd like to see 3-5-2 or perhaps more of a 3-4-1-2, but whatever the formation has to be Djuric & Taylor up front together. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Heggler Tomlin Brownhill Bryan Taylor Djuric Depends who LJ pulls out of the hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 5 hours ago, Matty Taylor [BCFC] said: We have no RB so.. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Brownhill Hegler Bryan Tomlin Djuric Judas The young chap he a rb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Just now, Rocking Red Cyril said: The young chap he a rb Pretty fly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Zak vyner I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonM88 Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Just now, Rocking Red Cyril said: Zak cyber I think That might just be his name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Mistype . See above I did edit. Vyner that the chappy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 I will not be at Fulham as unwell but hope crowd just make lots of noise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelbcfc Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 5 hours ago, old_eastender said: With Tammy out, surely, surely, LJ has to start with Djuric AND Taylor up front? Personally I'd like to see 3-5-2 or perhaps more of a 3-4-1-2, but whatever the formation has to be Djuric & Taylor up front together. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Heggler Tomlin Brownhill Bryan Taylor Djuric i would pick this team but swap bobby reid for tomlin . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 30 minutes ago, kelbcfc said: i would pick this team but swap bobby reid for tomlin . Or O'Neil....definitely prefer a flatter 3 in midfield in that formation. Taylor has already shown that his movement is good enough to 1. come short, give and go, 2. Come short into pockets and face up the CBs and 3. Run in behind. you don't need a no10, nor a free role no10. We need legs and energy. We have enough skill to create without resorting to LT, especially in a game against a team who will run us around....let's not forget Fulham are 8th. On his day MacDonald can run a midfield. Cairney has the sweetest left peg I've seen of late alongside Pringle and Garbutt. We must not get over-run in there. Will be win or list in there on Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 I'm hoping for a good goalkeeper, 4 good defenders, 4 good midfielders and a couple of lads who can stick a ball in the net - I think they are called strikers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 7 minutes ago, bcfcfinker said: I'm hoping for a good goalkeeper, 4 good defenders, 4 good midfielders and a couple of lads who can stick a ball in the net - I think they are called strikers. Think you're on to something. Get your CV up to date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 5 minutes ago, Davefevs said: Think you're on to something. Get your CV up to date. I think I'd be wasting my time... SL would be spoilt for choice with so many knowledgeable and more tactically aware posters on this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RumRed Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Just now, bcfcfinker said: I think I'd be wasting my time... SL would be spoilt for choice with so many knowledgeable and more tactically aware posters on this forum. Just promise to put a rocket up the players, play 4-4-2 and most importantly be cheap. You'll have the job in no time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, RumRed said: Just promise to put a rocket up the players, play 4-4-2 and most importantly be cheap. You'll have the job in no time Is delusion a qualification that helps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RumRed Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 5 minutes ago, bcfcfinker said: Is delusion a qualification that helps? It seems to be! Just promise Europe in 4 years, SL loves that stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 14 minutes ago, bcfcfinker said: I think I'd be wasting my time... SL would be spoilt for choice with so many knowledgeable and more tactically aware posters on this forum. Remember when MA said "you'd be surprised whose names are on our list" - was it yours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RumRed Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Davefevs said: Remember when MA said "you'd be surprised whose names are on our list" - was it yours? Geoff Capes was the big surprise for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 If my name was on the list, you would be ****ing surprised. There's the cheap option, the ****king cheap option and then the **** me, where did that come from option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RumRed Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, bcfcfinker said: If my name was on the list, you would be ****ing surprised. There's the cheap option, the ****king cheap option and then the **** me, where did that come from option? I'm liking the passion though, I'd give you the next three games tbh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 8 hours ago, Super said: This formation bollox is getting on my nerves. 4-4-2 and go for it. What does that mean really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 51 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said: What does that mean really? I think it's a cryptic cross word clue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest clerk Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Here's my team for Fulham..... Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Subs: Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie BCFC Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 14 hours ago, Matty Taylor [BCFC] said: We have no RB so.. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Brownhill Hegler Bryan Tomlin Djuric Judas Matthews is back from injury and we also have Vyner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, Flint says No said: Matthews is back from injury and we also have Vyner Matthews being back from injury doesn't necessarily mean he's match fit let alone 90 mins of one, Vyner Doesn't count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie BCFC Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Just now, Matty Taylor [BCFC] said: Matthews being back from injury doesn't necessarily mean he's match fit let alone 90 mins of one, Vyner is a CB. Yeah but he was on the bench v Leeds so he surely must be fit enough to start and Vyner can play RB like against Burnley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Flint says No said: Yeah but he was on the bench v Leeds so he surely must be fit enough to start and Vyner can play RB like against Burnley. First bit isn't true, second bit isn't good, collectively clutching Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 hours ago, clerk said: Here's my team for Fulham..... Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Subs: Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Bloody posh footballers with double barreled names .., Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobintheRed Red Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 10 hours ago, Tre Bong said: Depends who LJ pulls out of the hat. not bad side if brownhill dont perform bring on reid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tammy Wilbraham Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 4-3-1-2 Giefer Matthews, Wright, Mags, Bryan Hegeler, O'Neil, Smith Tomlin Djuric, Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFCGav Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Giefer Vyner/Matthews if fit Flint Wright Mags Cotts Hegeler Brownhill Bryan/Paters Djuric Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 With Tammy out, I'd hope the obvious happens and we start with Taylor and Djuric. And if the only reason we're apparently keeping Engvall around is because he might help cover for Tammy, then for all that is Holy; let's have him on the bench and actually consider playing him for once. If he's keen as mustard to get into the Swedish under-21s, he's got as much motivation as anyone to do well; give him that chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Rag Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Seems the majority agree taylor and Djuric upfront, just wonder if LJ is seeing that way. Two up top for me any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray White Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Kebano and Sessegnon will tear us a new one if we let them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Rich Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 2 hours ago, samo II said: With Tammy out, I'd hope the obvious happens and we start with Taylor and Djuric. And if the only reason we're apparently keeping Engvall around is because he might help cover for Tammy, then for all that is Holy; let's have him on the bench and actually consider playing him for once. If he's keen as mustard to get into the Swedish under-21s, he's got as much motivation as anyone to do well; give him that chance. Totally agree. Has to be Taylor and Djuric up top regardless of formation and if we're keeping Engvall around he has to make the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, RichardEdd said: Totally agree. Has to be Taylor and Djuric up top regardless of formation and if we're keeping Engvall around he has to make the bench. In my mind, Engvall seems a logical replacement for Taylor if he's needing subbed, while Wilbs can cover for Djuric. If he's not in the squad, we should just let Engvall go to Sweden; no point keeping him about otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 The sun will shine tomorrow, count on à City win . There will be a wailing and a wringing of hands by those who want LJ bannished . Three points on the board there will be . The houses of Taylor and Djuric will kill assorted vegetables for a great feast to celebrate their goals And we , the followers of the Robins , will dance In the streets and sing of these great deeds . I don't quite know what happened there but I have a feeling we're going to win on Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42nite Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 20 hours ago, Ashtonwurzel said: Giefer Wright Flint Magnusson Hegler Brownhill Cotterill Bryan Tomlin Wilbraham Taylor Tomlin gets a "free role" and Djuric comes on for Wilbs after an hour. We win 3-2. No problem. Yesss, This formation will confuse the living daylights out of them. Go for it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alessandro Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockinredrobin Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 22 hours ago, old_eastender said: With Tammy out, surely, surely, LJ has to start with Djuric AND Taylor up front? Personally I'd like to see 3-5-2 or perhaps more of a 3-4-1-2, but whatever the formation has to be Djuric & Taylor up front together. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Heggler Tomlin Brownhill Bryan Taylor Djuric Id try Brownhill Right Back - he was excellent there for 45 minutes v Forest earlier in the season He is neither combative nor experienced enough to dominate a Championship game in midfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmite Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Who is this Mags chappie everyone keeps on about? Some new recruit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WECANDO Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Are some of you bonkers. Wanting Wilbraham instead of Djuric. The latter is far better at holding the ball up, better in the air and better at battling against centre forwards. Also we need energy and quick legs. That leaves out Tomlin (Reluctantly) and let's in Reid for me as he has the engine to break forward and support the two forwards. He also gets back sharp. Or could go for Patterson. Don't like Golbourne at the moment so Bryan back there with O'Dowda in front. Or can go three at the back with Wright, Flint and Magnusson. And Cotterill, Hegerson, Reid, Browning and Bryan. That's a lively five. Whoever is selected in whatever formation, we have to get behind the lads as soon as they come onto the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ooRya Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 20 hours ago, Alessandro said: Hoping/expecting to see that team tonight, and confident of 3 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, ooRya said: Hoping/expecting to see that team tonight, and confident of 3 points. replace flint with maggers and I'd take that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerseybean Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Provided Tomlin can put a really good shift in I'd go for the OP line up, although tbh have my doubts as Tomlin is so inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Jerseybean said: Provided Tomlin can put a really good shift in I'd go for the OP line up, although tbh have my doubts as Tomlin is so inconsistent. personally Tomlin wouldn't be in my team at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 On 20/02/2017 at 17:22, old_eastender said: With Tammy out, surely, surely, LJ has to start with Djuric AND Taylor up front? Personally I'd like to see 3-5-2 or perhaps more of a 3-4-1-2, but whatever the formation has to be Djuric & Taylor up front together. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Heggler Tomlin Brownhill Bryan Taylor Djuric Djuric can't plough the lone furrow so I see that his hand is forced..If Lee goes one up top it would be puzzling,putting it politely. Time to play Magners also. one "up top" and again no Magners then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 42 minutes ago, ooRya said: Hoping/expecting to see that team tonight, and confident of 3 points. Your starting early today??..Good effort! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 41 minutes ago, Monkeh said: replace flint with maggers and I'd take that Replace Wright please...Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ooRya Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, Robert the bruce said: Your starting early today??..Good effort! Am I missing the joke somewhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 7 minutes ago, ooRya said: Am I missing the joke somewhere? drinking, he's thinks you are pissed because you said we'll get 3 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slippin cider Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, JamesBCFC said: He brings the Wright stuff to the side, that's for sure. I think you're wright there .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Giefer Matthews - Flint - Wright - Golbourne Cotterill - Brownhill - Hegeler - Bryan Djuric - Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Jerseybean said: Provided Tomlin can put a really good shift in I'd go for the OP line up, although tbh have my doubts as Tomlin is so inconsistent. I like the look of this . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xerox6060 Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Understand the changing of players (in moderation) but don't want to see anymore messing around with the starting formation 4-4-2 for me or ok 4-4-1-1 in tough away games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossendale Red Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Jerseybean said: Provided Tomlin can put a really good shift in I'd go for the OP line up, although tbh have my doubts as Tomlin is so inconsistent. Possibly only change to this for me would be GON (if fit) in for Hegeler...not a reflection on him as I do think he is a very good player but would like us to play a high tempo tonight. Not sure Hegeler and GON would work together and I like Brownhill's energy. Hopefully Tommo is on it tonight to link up with Taylor and Cotts and JB can get some good deliveries into Djuric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linkedarm wall Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 7 minutes ago, xerox6060 said: Understand the changing of players (in moderation) but don't want to see anymore messing around with the starting formation 4-4-2 for me or ok 4-4-1-1 in tough away games. I tend to agree and 4-4-2 is something that players apparently understand the best. The trouble is with our squad, 4-4-2 means the likes of Vyner, Matthews,Goldbourne, Little (when fit) have to play in some guise and it means a 'left back' (ish) in Bryan playing left midfield, are they good enough? Also means Mags can't get in. We have Tomlin, Paterson, Reid who prefer to play 'in the hole', so it rules them out as well. So in my opinion the best use of our squad is 3-4-3 and to get our best players playing and having to use any of our full backs! gif / fileding wright flint Mags Cotts heg/o neill brownhill/pack bryan tomlin/Reid/Paterson Djuric/ Wilbs Tammy/ Taylor Whether our better players are good enough remains to be seen and if the recruitment and tactics are good enough. COYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 8 minutes ago, South Bristol Red #4 said: Possibly only change to this for me would be GON (if fit) in for Hegeler...not a reflection on him as I do think he is a very good player but would like us to play a high tempo tonight. Not sure Hegeler and GON would work together and I like Brownhill's energy. Hopefully Tommo is on it tonight to link up with Taylor and Cotts and JB can get some good deliveries into Djuric. I think with Brownhill over pack allows us to play at a higher tempo, I think o'neil would slow it down, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC OF SWEDEN Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 It´s time to rest Flint and get Hordur in the team! Flints is to slow and no big threat in our corners and freekicks anymore. PS LJ will never rest him so i hope he scores today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Rich Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, Linkedarm wall said: I tend to agree and 4-4-2 is something that players apparently understand the best. The trouble is with our squad, 4-4-2 means the likes of Vyner, Matthews,Goldbourne, Little (when fit) have to play in some guise and it means a 'left back' (ish) in Bryan playing left midfield, are they good enough? Also means Mags can't get in. We have Tomlin, Paterson, Reid who prefer to play 'in the hole', so it rules them out as well. So in my opinion the best use of our squad is 3-4-3 and to get our best players playing and having to use any of our full backs! gif / fileding wright flint Mags Cotts heg/o neill brownhill/pack bryan tomlin/Reid/Paterson Djuric/ Wilbs Tammy/ Taylor Whether our better players are good enough remains to be seen and if the recruitment and tactics are good enough. COYR Good post. I'm a little torn between this formation and 4-4-2 with the line Alessandro posted. I like the 3-4-3/5-3-2 you posted for lots of reasons and you've articulated them well, However, I think I'd still lean towards 442 more because of where we are in the league, it's a little more familliar and simple to deploy and while we are struggling probably makes the most sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.