Guest Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 If my name was on the list, you would be ****ing surprised. There's the cheap option, the ****king cheap option and then the **** me, where did that come from option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RumRed Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, bcfcfinker said: If my name was on the list, you would be ****ing surprised. There's the cheap option, the ****king cheap option and then the **** me, where did that come from option? I'm liking the passion though, I'd give you the next three games tbh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 8 hours ago, Super said: This formation bollox is getting on my nerves. 4-4-2 and go for it. What does that mean really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 51 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said: What does that mean really? I think it's a cryptic cross word clue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clerk Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Here's my team for Fulham..... Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Subs: Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie BCFC Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 14 hours ago, Matty Taylor [BCFC] said: We have no RB so.. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Brownhill Hegler Bryan Tomlin Djuric Judas Matthews is back from injury and we also have Vyner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, Flint says No said: Matthews is back from injury and we also have Vyner Matthews being back from injury doesn't necessarily mean he's match fit let alone 90 mins of one, Vyner Doesn't count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie BCFC Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Just now, Matty Taylor [BCFC] said: Matthews being back from injury doesn't necessarily mean he's match fit let alone 90 mins of one, Vyner is a CB. Yeah but he was on the bench v Leeds so he surely must be fit enough to start and Vyner can play RB like against Burnley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unan Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Flint says No said: Yeah but he was on the bench v Leeds so he surely must be fit enough to start and Vyner can play RB like against Burnley. First bit isn't true, second bit isn't good, collectively clutching Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 hours ago, clerk said: Here's my team for Fulham..... Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Subs: Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Johnson Out Bloody posh footballers with double barreled names .., Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobintheRed Red Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 10 hours ago, Tre Bong said: Depends who LJ pulls out of the hat. not bad side if brownhill dont perform bring on reid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tammy Wilbraham Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 4-3-1-2 Giefer Matthews, Wright, Mags, Bryan Hegeler, O'Neil, Smith Tomlin Djuric, Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFCGav Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Giefer Vyner/Matthews if fit Flint Wright Mags Cotts Hegeler Brownhill Bryan/Paters Djuric Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 With Tammy out, I'd hope the obvious happens and we start with Taylor and Djuric. And if the only reason we're apparently keeping Engvall around is because he might help cover for Tammy, then for all that is Holy; let's have him on the bench and actually consider playing him for once. If he's keen as mustard to get into the Swedish under-21s, he's got as much motivation as anyone to do well; give him that chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Rag Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Seems the majority agree taylor and Djuric upfront, just wonder if LJ is seeing that way. Two up top for me any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray White Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Kebano and Sessegnon will tear us a new one if we let them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Rich Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 2 hours ago, samo II said: With Tammy out, I'd hope the obvious happens and we start with Taylor and Djuric. And if the only reason we're apparently keeping Engvall around is because he might help cover for Tammy, then for all that is Holy; let's have him on the bench and actually consider playing him for once. If he's keen as mustard to get into the Swedish under-21s, he's got as much motivation as anyone to do well; give him that chance. Totally agree. Has to be Taylor and Djuric up top regardless of formation and if we're keeping Engvall around he has to make the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, RichardEdd said: Totally agree. Has to be Taylor and Djuric up top regardless of formation and if we're keeping Engvall around he has to make the bench. In my mind, Engvall seems a logical replacement for Taylor if he's needing subbed, while Wilbs can cover for Djuric. If he's not in the squad, we should just let Engvall go to Sweden; no point keeping him about otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 The sun will shine tomorrow, count on à City win . There will be a wailing and a wringing of hands by those who want LJ bannished . Three points on the board there will be . The houses of Taylor and Djuric will kill assorted vegetables for a great feast to celebrate their goals And we , the followers of the Robins , will dance In the streets and sing of these great deeds . I don't quite know what happened there but I have a feeling we're going to win on Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42nite Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 20 hours ago, Ashtonwurzel said: Giefer Wright Flint Magnusson Hegler Brownhill Cotterill Bryan Tomlin Wilbraham Taylor Tomlin gets a "free role" and Djuric comes on for Wilbs after an hour. We win 3-2. No problem. Yesss, This formation will confuse the living daylights out of them. Go for it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alessandro Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockinredrobin Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 22 hours ago, old_eastender said: With Tammy out, surely, surely, LJ has to start with Djuric AND Taylor up front? Personally I'd like to see 3-5-2 or perhaps more of a 3-4-1-2, but whatever the formation has to be Djuric & Taylor up front together. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Heggler Tomlin Brownhill Bryan Taylor Djuric Id try Brownhill Right Back - he was excellent there for 45 minutes v Forest earlier in the season He is neither combative nor experienced enough to dominate a Championship game in midfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmite Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Who is this Mags chappie everyone keeps on about? Some new recruit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WECANDO Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Are some of you bonkers. Wanting Wilbraham instead of Djuric. The latter is far better at holding the ball up, better in the air and better at battling against centre forwards. Also we need energy and quick legs. That leaves out Tomlin (Reluctantly) and let's in Reid for me as he has the engine to break forward and support the two forwards. He also gets back sharp. Or could go for Patterson. Don't like Golbourne at the moment so Bryan back there with O'Dowda in front. Or can go three at the back with Wright, Flint and Magnusson. And Cotterill, Hegerson, Reid, Browning and Bryan. That's a lively five. Whoever is selected in whatever formation, we have to get behind the lads as soon as they come onto the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ooRya Posted February 22, 2017 Report Share Posted February 22, 2017 20 hours ago, Alessandro said: Hoping/expecting to see that team tonight, and confident of 3 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 22, 2017 Report Share Posted February 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, ooRya said: Hoping/expecting to see that team tonight, and confident of 3 points. replace flint with maggers and I'd take that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerseybean Posted February 22, 2017 Report Share Posted February 22, 2017 Provided Tomlin can put a really good shift in I'd go for the OP line up, although tbh have my doubts as Tomlin is so inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 22, 2017 Report Share Posted February 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Jerseybean said: Provided Tomlin can put a really good shift in I'd go for the OP line up, although tbh have my doubts as Tomlin is so inconsistent. personally Tomlin wouldn't be in my team at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted February 22, 2017 Report Share Posted February 22, 2017 On 20/02/2017 at 17:22, old_eastender said: With Tammy out, surely, surely, LJ has to start with Djuric AND Taylor up front? Personally I'd like to see 3-5-2 or perhaps more of a 3-4-1-2, but whatever the formation has to be Djuric & Taylor up front together. Giefer Wright Flint Mags Cotteril Heggler Tomlin Brownhill Bryan Taylor Djuric Djuric can't plough the lone furrow so I see that his hand is forced..If Lee goes one up top it would be puzzling,putting it politely. Time to play Magners also. one "up top" and again no Magners then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted February 22, 2017 Report Share Posted February 22, 2017 42 minutes ago, ooRya said: Hoping/expecting to see that team tonight, and confident of 3 points. Your starting early today??..Good effort! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.