22A Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 In that League Cup Final Man U showed how when a two goal lead evaporates, attack again and get a late winner rather than hang on for a draw and call it a good result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 1 hour ago, 22A said: In that League Cup Final Man U showed how when a two goal lead evaporates, attack again and get a late winner rather than hang on for a draw and call it a good result. And if we had lost 3-2 because we had been caught on the break trying to get the winner would LJ have been applauded for that, or would the threads all have been about our lack of game management again? The only thing we had in common with Man Utd on Saturday is that both our strikers were in their mid 30's. Man United were favourites to win their game, Newcastle were favourites to win ours, which one failed to live up to that favourite status? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Port Said Red said: And if we had lost 3-2 because we had been caught on the break trying to get the winner would LJ have been applauded for that, or would the threads all have been about our lack of game management again? The only thing we had in common with Man Utd on Saturday is that both our strikers were in their mid 30's. Man United were favourites to win their game, Newcastle were favourites to win ours, which one failed to live up to that favourite status? back in October he would of, currently no, he needs to have 3 or 4 games in a row where we are comfortable winners to start winning back the trust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 I think it's the substitutions and tactics. Clearly- bucking the trends earlier in the season, when we came on strong in the 2nd half of games for about the 1st 3rd of the season, it was inevitable we would;d get back in most of the time- when we did we usually won. Now it seems the reverse happens- Derby and now Newcastle, Reading. Dunno what it is exactly- but substitutions of late seem too late, incorrect. Perhaps too late to shore things up- Derby being the prime example, Newcastle was still a good point in the circs but Derby we should have won no doubt about it. Reading we should have won. It all to me though comes from a bigger thing this season. How many truly quality 90 minute performances? 2 halves as strong as the other, how many have we put in this season? Fulham away is one obviously, Leeds at Home was pretty competitive throughout but there really are not many are there? Quality followed by consistency- or vice versa. Maybe I will go through it game by game- but coming from behind or having to keep coming from behind...will wear down a side, will cause some mental collapse eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 21 hours ago, RichardEdd said: I thought I'd get some more detail on this and it's not great: # Club Times leading Wins Draws Losses 1 Brighton & Hove Albion 22 20 2 0 2 Newcastle United 26 22 3 1 3 Huddersfield Town 23 20 3 0 4 Leeds United 21 18 2 1 5 Reading FC 20 18 1 1 6 Sheffield Wednesday 20 17 2 1 7 Fulham FC 20 14 4 2 8 Norwich City 21 15 4 2 9 Preston North End 17 13 4 0 10 Barnsley FC 18 14 2 2 11 Derby County 18 13 3 2 12 Cardiff City 18 13 4 1 13 Brentford FC 16 11 2 3 14 Birmingham City 16 10 3 3 15 Ipswich Town 15 10 5 0 16 Queens Park Rangers 15 11 3 1 17 Aston Villa 18 8 8 2 18 Nottingham Forest 19 10 4 5 19 Burton Albion 13 9 3 1 20 Wolverhampton Wanderers 13 9 2 2 21 Bristol City 15 9 2 4 22 Wigan Athletic 12 7 1 4 23 Blackburn Rovers 11 7 3 1 24 Rotherham United 13 4 5 4 Although I then looked at the opposite and .... # Club deficits Wins Draws Losses Points 1 Fulham FC 20 4 8 8 20 2 Nottingham Forest 24 4 3 17 15 3 Brighton & Hove Albion 12 3 5 4 14 4 Cardiff City 19 4 1 14 13 5 Bristol City 25 3 4 18 13 6 Blackburn Rovers 23 3 4 16 13 7 Sheffield Wednesday 15 3 3 9 12 8 Barnsley FC 18 3 3 12 12 9 Reading FC 15 2 4 9 10 10 Wolverhampton Wanderers 20 2 4 14 10 11 Huddersfield Town 12 2 2 8 8 12 Preston North End 15 1 4 10 7 13 Birmingham City 18 1 4 13 7 14 Ipswich Town 16 1 3 12 6 15 Aston Villa 16 1 3 12 6 16 Leeds United 14 1 2 11 5 17 Norwich City 15 1 2 12 5 18 Derby County 13 1 2 10 5 19 Brentford FC 17 1 2 14 5 20 Burton Albion 19 1 2 16 5 21 Newcastle United 9 1 1 7 4 22 Queens Park Rangers 19 0 4 15 4 23 Wigan Athletic 20 0 3 17 3 24 Rotherham United 26 0 2 24 2 Which is quite amazing really. It suggests that we geniunally are better off going behind! It also suggests where LJ weakness is knowing how to control a game once we're ahead. I think that could be his lack of experience and perhaps almost a need on his part to be seen to being doing something - tinkering with the team he has actually already set up well. What is also shows is that he does know how to annalise and adapt to the opposition. He clearly has a talent for that and that shows his ability to read the game and tactically out-think his opponents. It looks to me that he just needs to learn to not change for the sake of change. How do you work that out? 29 points from leading positions, 13 from losing positions? We still generally win more often than not if we take the lead, and lose more often than not when we go behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 3 hours ago, 22A said: In that League Cup Final Man U showed how when a two goal lead evaporates, attack again and get a late winner rather than hang on for a draw and call it a good result. No comparison there at all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 a pointless duplication Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Rich Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 2 hours ago, MarcusX said: How do you work that out? 29 points from leading positions, 13 from losing positions? We still generally win more often than not if we take the lead, and lose more often than not when we go behind. Because what normally happens in a league is you compare yourself to the other teams in it. We are the fourth worst in the league at hanging on to a least which is terrible. And the fifth best in the league at turning it around. What you are describing is the same for pretty much everyone - the league tables I presented show this. This thread is about how good or bad we are at protecting a lead the tables show this exactly and in comparison to everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 On 25/02/2017 at 20:55, Bristol Rob said: Please prove that out net spend was one of the highest in the division and that Warnock would have won these games and I will reply sensibly Seeing as our net spend was virtually £0 in the summer, and is now about £1.5m at most we will have one of the lower net spends in the division. However some people like to use 'alternative facts'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS4 on Tour... Posted February 27, 2017 Report Share Posted February 27, 2017 On 25/02/2017 at 20:59, LC_ said: We were never expected to take even a point so regardless of the fashion in which that point happened, LJ deserves the credit for achieving it. I'm not entirely surprised the team struggled to keep the two goal lead for 90 minutes - Wilbs is 37, Smith lacking match practice, so against a team top of the league, it's not a massive surprise to concede late in the 2nd half. One swallow doesn't make a summer however, and I've still not seen enough from LJ to have a new found belief that he's the right man to lead the club forward. I'm sorry but I don't agree, when you are in the same division (not league) as 23 other clubs, you are acknowledged as being at the same level at them. Obviously a lot of others factors come into play but I still don't accept comments like "we were never expected to take a point..." Why not? Why the hell not?! But to be fair to you, it seems like the players don't think we belong in this division sometimes, we've given away two goal leads, three goal leads, 2-1 situations....etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up The City! Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 hours ago, BS4 on Tour... said: I'm sorry but I don't agree, when you are in the same division (not league) as 23 other clubs, you are acknowledged as being at the same level at them. Obviously a lot of others factors come into play but I still don't accept comments like "we were never expected to take a point..." Why not? Why the hell not?! But to be fair to you, it seems like the players don't think we belong in this division sometimes, we've given away two goal leads, three goal leads, 2-1 situations....etc... I honestly thought we'd be hammered 4+ I didn't even look at the team sheet because that's how little faith I had in us. I was there for the piss up, for the occasion. We don't get good cup draws so this was as close as we get to having one of those. In this particular ground, against a top team, against a roaring 49k Geordies our team did incredibly well to hang on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.