Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

From the Rovers OS "Kamil has Championship experience at Middlesbrough and Watford...........

Screenshot_2024-01-26-17-44-55-08_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg.a27ccf4e61d0319ce453e0fcc052446d.jpg

Not like them to exaggerate is it?

You can't put a price on that kind of experience. But if you could, **** all should just about cover it.

  • Haha 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Maesknoll Red said:

Obviously Klopp had got his resignation in before they could knock Liverpool out……

Yeah, he probably realised there was a very remote chance that Liverpool might have been invaded by the Saggy hordes, and felt that was too much of a gamble to be taken ever again. 

Hence...I'm off, never to manage another English club again.  That should do it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrightCiderLife said:

Obviously the club can only accept one offer. If another club comes along and offer £X, the selling club may wait to see if anyone else will come in, if they doing, there’s no reason they wouldn’t offer £X+1 etc (until one of them gets to a number no one else is willing to pay). 

That’s not true re only accepting one offer.
 

The reality is that the offer is only accepted upon conclusion of a transfer. Terms may be agreed ‘in principle’ which will mean the selling club will grant the player permission to meet the buyer and hopefully negotiate personal terms. Or even a club could grant that permission whilst terms of the transfer are still being ironed out - that is typical on deadline day for instance; and puts the seller in a strong negotiation position because the player and their representatives could pressure the buying club into meeting the seller’s terms. 

I suspect what happened here is rovers made an offer above the release clause but the terms were exclusivity to talk to the player over a short time frame. IE our offer is £x more but we want 48 hours to conclude the deal, if player talks to another club our offer is reduced to £y. 

1 hour ago, BrightCiderLife said:

Obviously the club can only accept one offer. If another club comes along and offer £X, the selling club may wait to see if anyone else will come in, if they doing, there’s no reason they wouldn’t offer £X+1 etc (until one of them gets to a number no one else is willing to pay). 

That’s not true re only accepting one offer.
 

The reality is that the offer is only accepted upon conclusion of a transfer. Terms may be agreed ‘in principle’ which will mean the selling club will grant the player permission to meet the buyer and hopefully negotiate personal terms. Or even a club could grant that permission whilst terms of the transfer are still being ironed out - that is typical on deadline day for instance; and puts the seller in a strong negotiation position because the player and their representatives could pressure the buying club into meeting the seller’s terms. 

I suspect what happened here is rovers made an offer above the release clause but the terms were exclusivity to talk to the player over a short time frame. IE our offer is £x more but we want 48 hours to conclude the deal, if player talks to another club our offer is reduced to £y. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25,787 last night with approximately 2500 from Nottingham. Meanwhile they will be hoping that their ticket giveaway will grab enough fans away from the rugby to finally make 10,000 with approximately 1200 Oxford fans. They are the blue third of Bristol and if they are not careful, the "quarters" could become an apt name for them very soon.

  • Like 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

25,787 last night with approximately 2500 from Nottingham. Meanwhile they will be hoping that their ticket giveaway will grab enough fans away from the rugby to finally make 10,000 with approximately 1200 Oxford fans. They are the blue third of Bristol and if they are not careful, the "quarters" could become an apt name for them very soon.

Thought the Atyeo held more than 2500 🤔 really small stand 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

25,787 last night with approximately 2500 from Nottingham. Meanwhile they will be hoping that their ticket giveaway will grab enough fans away from the rugby to finally make 10,000 with approximately 1200 Oxford fans. They are the blue third of Bristol and if they are not careful, the "quarters" could become an apt name for them very soon.

Took a pic before the game n uploaded it to Facebook, was clearly empty as was 7.30, gas pipes up saying how empty it was last night, shut the F up all of them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

From the Rovers OS "Kamil has Championship experience at Middlesbrough and Watford...........

Screenshot_2024-01-26-17-44-55-08_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg.a27ccf4e61d0319ce453e0fcc052446d.jpg

Not like them to exaggerate is it?

Gaslogic: Don't let plain facts get in the way of the truth.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The TV news last night mentioned how busy AG will be this weekend.

Full last night and big crowds for rugby today and the WSL tomorrow. 

Just read the BBC report on last night - Gas fans should give up on the wind ups, they hold no weight these days. They should focus on their 'promotion' battle in the bottom half, trying to get 75% cattle into the shed and supporting their new, non record youngster on who so much depends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GreedyHarry said:

Well! I don’t know how to spell it but it defo ain’t like that🤣

pucklegas
Gas 
********
4 hours ago
 
Quote
In hospitality today so the alcohol will anaethatis another defeat 1 2, coldplay who else!

I think the poor dear was trying for ‘anaesthetise’ 

Edited by Southport Red
  • Haha 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

25,787 last night with approximately 2500 from Nottingham. Meanwhile they will be hoping that their ticket giveaway will grab enough fans away from the rugby to finally make 10,000 with approximately 1200 Oxford fans. They are the blue third of Bristol and if they are not careful, the "quarters" could become an apt name for them very soon.

I think they are already behind the Vixens in terms of average home attendance. So they do lay claim to being the 4th biggest supported side in the City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

25,787 last night with approximately 2500 from Nottingham. Meanwhile they will be hoping that their ticket giveaway will grab enough fans away from the rugby to finally make 10,000 with approximately 1200 Oxford fans. They are the blue third of Bristol and if they are not careful, the "quarters" could become an apt name for them very soon.

LJ got absolutely slated be the slummers when he said after a game (can’t remember which) “the red half of brist…well, the red two thirds of Bristol, will be happy tonight”. He was absolutely spot on. The gap is only getting wider. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

25,787 last night with approximately 2500 from Nottingham. Meanwhile they will be hoping that their ticket giveaway will grab enough fans away from the rugby to finally make 10,000 with approximately 1200 Oxford fans. They are the blue third of Bristol and if they are not careful, the "quarters" could become an apt name for them very soon.

Not even a third mate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

About to jinx it but... if you want to watch Rovers lose then

https://papa8k.live/bristol-rovers-vs-oxford-united/

https://streamexpert.xyz/aa1/a166/

https://www.hqlive.store/p/ifollow-ch-166.html

https://sportzclub.online/dan/b166
https://dlhd.sx/stream/stream-166.php

 

 

Didn't realise there new player has only played half a season at Grimsby, thought there was a bit more to 'back up' the claim that he's half decent

Edited by Marcus Aurelius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Aaron Collins refusing to play for them today to force a move. Deary me. £10m in the bank for them at least….

The best creator in the third tier doesn’t actually create anything. Also Al-Hamadi may have a tough choice to make between the Championship and League One.

My primary concern is not selling Aaron Collins - it is replacing him. As others have said, led in force by Pirate, we do not have any form of recruitment structure behind the scenes and we're about to likely part ways with the current best creator in the third tier. We already struggle to create and score goals. Where are we going to replace what Collins CAN (and occasionally, this season, HAS) offer? I understand balancing the books (£1m or whatever the fee will be helps with FFP etc.) but we absolutely MUST sign a creative, goal-scoring striker. Sam Smith, Ali Al-Hamadi, Jake Young... whoever. We need a replacement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...