Bristol Boy Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 Just listened to the first half. No width. Crossing poor. Free Kicks Useless. Only last ditch defence keeping us in it. Their full backs having a field day with more space than they know what to do with. Last season they couldn't get the ball off us, we won 1-0 and it should have been 4. I think the summariser has mentioned the 4-3-3 formation being awful about, oh, 20 times since the start, so all in all, a major step forward 0-0 Change it man for Christs sake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlokeCDP Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 Cant win can you? Too defensive, or too attacking, dont change anything ever cos it wont work........ sigh. Give it some time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 If City lose tonight after being lucky to get in at level at H-T and BT doesn't change it,how long before the Wilson critics become the Tinnion critics. At least they won't be able to point out that BT lives far away from Bristol - unless you call 7 miles far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted August 10, 2004 Author Share Posted August 10, 2004 Cant win can you? Too defensive, or too attacking, dont change anything ever cos it wont work........ sigh. Give it some time! ← It's not "too" anything. We are disjointed-Murrays being forced to defend which he's no good at.The service to the attackers is non existent and we're lucky not to be 2-0 down. No, come to think of it, leave it as it is-Sounds great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted August 10, 2004 Author Share Posted August 10, 2004 If City lose tonight after being lucky to get in at level at H-T and BT doesn't change it,how long before the Wilson critics become the Tinnion critics. At least they won't be able to point out that BT lives far away from Bristol - unless you call 7 miles far. ← Tell it like it is. DW,BT, I couldn't care less rubbish is rubbish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 We are disjointed-Murrays being forced to defend which he's no good at ← The only reason Murray is being forced to defend is because he isnt sticking to the touchline like he should be. This narrows our entire formation and we then find it hard to keep possession. If Murray moved wide then we would have more space infield for Orr and Tinns and could use Murray as an outlet. I hate to single him out but Murray is the only problem in the team at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 We are not losing so hang on in there but in respect of Murray not playing wide, on Saturday Tins complained that the front three were not playing close enough - he doesn't want him playing wide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 But he said he wanted him playing wider - interview on BCFC world. This was after he said the front 3 were to far apart ← Thats my concern - he said the opposite in the Evil Post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 he doesn't want him playing wide? ← http://www.bcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsD...~549704,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfc seattle Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 Lets at least wait till after the game to de-contruct the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 Lets at least wait till after the game to de-contruct the game. ← Presumably that means something to north americans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.