Jump to content
IGNORED

Korey Smith


steviestevieneville

Recommended Posts

Just now, Tinmans Love Child said:

That 2015 squad was dismantled quicker than a formula 1 car 

Was it? I seem to remember that SL fell out with SC they got into an argument over Gayle and Grey and the promotion team were not reinforced sufficiently. Even the leg end that was Sack Cloth kicked us back. But I’m old now memory might be faulty!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
6 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

Only thinking the other day where he went after leaving Swansea . Playing right back for derby in the FA cup against Torquay . Club legend is banded around too much these days but korey & the rest of that 2015 squad really are . 

Such a legend you spelt his name wrong ?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said:

That 2015 squad was dismantled quicker than a formula 1 car 

Couldn’t agree more. We ****** it right up the following season . 2 or 3 quality players added to that squad and we would of been fine. I might be wrong but I always got the feeling Lansdown couldn’t wait to sack cotts because he wasn’t his appointment . 

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

Only thinking the other day where he went after leaving Swansea . Playing right back for derby in the FA cup against Torquay . Club legend is banded around too much these days but korey & the rest of that 2015 squad really are . 

That Luke Ayling didn't amount to much. Right Lee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tinmans Love Child said:

That 2015 squad was dismantled quicker than a formula 1 car 

Agreed.

That was the big chance missed by Lansdown IMO. He probably regrets it now in terms of the way SC was treated. Brilliant squad, a couple of additions (Gayle would have been quality IMO). Also a Richard Gould style character holding the purse strings would have stopped the likes of Ashton & Johnson spunking the £££s away. What a shambles.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, REDOXO said:

Was it? I seem to remember that SL fell out with SC they got into an argument over Gayle and Grey and the promotion team were not reinforced sufficiently. Even the leg end that was Sack Cloth kicked us back. But I’m old now memory might be faulty!

I'd have us down as weaker to begin that season than the side who got promoted!

All the same, one more year of patience by Cotts, park ambition for a year, well he would then or should then have inherited the budget that Lee Johnson got as the revenue streams grew.

Don't think anyone came out of that period with great credit.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

I'd have us down as weaker to begin that season than the side who got promoted!

All the same, one more year of patience by Cotts, park ambition for a year, well he would then or should then have inherited the budget that Lee Johnson got as the revenue streams grew.

Don't think anyone came out of that period with great credit.

The kodjia signing and sale kick started that period of buying and selling, it could have been enough to see us finally make it, but if theres a way of ballsing it up we will find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Simon bristol said:

The kodjia signing and sale kick started that period of buying and selling, it could have been enough to see us finally make it, but if theres a way of ballsing it up we will find it.

True, although turnover rising year on year by £7.1m also helped! Likewise the lower losses in 2015-16 helped us in the 3 year cycle to 2016-17 and 2017-18.

That rise in turnover was roughly 50 percent on year as the redeveloped ground finally opened fully, the period ending 2016-17 was the first 3 year cycle so Lee Johnson benefited from this too, bit of a happy accident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

True, although turnover rising year on year by £7.1m also helped! Likewise the lower losses in 2015-16 helped us in the 3 year cycle to 2016-17 and 2017-18.

That rise in turnover was roughly 50 percent on year as the redeveloped ground finally opened fully, the period ending 2016-17 was the first 3 year cycle so Lee Johnson benefited from this too, bit of a happy accident.

image.thumb.png.ad28acbe0939cbb2945e8a79fc1386bc.png
(Holdings)

Revenue rose from £14.2m to £30.3m peak (dropped in 19/20 due to covid for last third of season).  That looks great, it more than doubled (113%).  But as you say ground development meant £14.2m was a false-bottom.  Even so, revenue grew by £16.1m, nice.

However, costs rose from £26.7m to £62.6m peak, a rise of £35.9m (134%).  For every £1.00 we increased revenue we spent £2.23 doing it.

It was masked by transfer profit.

The costs rose as follows:

image.thumb.png.4a7c761323a45da6e96555abe76f9e22.png

Wages doubled, a combo of paying too much and for too many.

Amortisation (figs above are amortisation plus depreciation) went from £2m to £14m, a seven-fold increase, burdening us for a few years as players contracts and their transfer fee costs were sunk.

Other costs went up, but in many respects, there if of course costs in raising revenue.  So it’s okay saying we’ve increased revenue, but we didn’t raise it efficiently, far from it.  As fans, in our naivety we thought the stadium development would bring in extra money at zero cost.  Nope.

What was our strategy:

  • buy young, develop, sell for a profit
  • develop our own players

We executed that first bullet well four times - Flint, Kodjia, Webster and Brownhill.  We have failed miserably on some - Diedhiou, Massengo, Kalas!  Some small wins - Eisa, Szmodics, Magnússon, Eliasson although transfer profit swallowed up with their wages over the period they were here.  Without Webster we would be in serious, serious trouble…although perversely we might not have gone out that season and spent £25m on:

image.thumb.png.e62115acf8cbb62b4d2669d40c3aa609.png

Re the second bullet, that’s been the real saving grace.  Reid, Bryan and Kelly, with Semenyo, Scott and Conway to come.  It is this area that will allow us to return to trying to be sustainable (albeit with a bit of funding from SL).

We were mismanaged…shockingly so.

Hopefully we will see 21/22’s accounts this week.

  • Like 2
  • Flames 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

image.thumb.png.ad28acbe0939cbb2945e8a79fc1386bc.png
(Holdings)

Revenue rose from £14.2m to £30.3m peak (dropped in 19/20 due to covid for last third of season).  That looks great, it more than doubled (113%).  But as you say ground development meant £14.2m was a false-bottom.  Even so, revenue grew by £16.1m, nice.

However, costs rose from £26.7m to £62.6m peak, a rise of £35.9m (134%).  For every £1.00 we increased revenue we spent £2.23 doing it.

It was masked by transfer profit.

The costs rose as follows:

image.thumb.png.4a7c761323a45da6e96555abe76f9e22.png

Wages doubled, a combo of paying too much and for too many.

Amortisation (figs above are amortisation plus depreciation) went from £2m to £14m, a seven-fold increase, burdening us for a few years as players contracts and their transfer fee costs were sunk.

Other costs went up, but in many respects, there if of course costs in raising revenue.  So it’s okay saying we’ve increased revenue, but we didn’t raise it efficiently, far from it.  As fans, in our naivety we thought the stadium development would bring in extra money at zero cost.  Nope.

What was our strategy:

  • buy young, develop, sell for a profit
  • develop our own players

We executed that first bullet well four times - Flint, Kodjia, Webster and Brownhill.  We have failed miserably on some - Diedhiou, Massengo, Kalas!  Some small wins - Eisa, Szmodics, Magnússon, Eliasson although transfer profit swallowed up with their wages over the period they were here.  Without Webster we would be in serious, serious trouble…although perversely we might not have gone out that season and spent £25m on:

image.thumb.png.e62115acf8cbb62b4d2669d40c3aa609.png

Re the second bullet, that’s been the real saving grace.  Reid, Bryan and Kelly, with Semenyo, Scott and Conway to come.  It is this area that will allow us to return to trying to be sustainable (albeit with a bit of funding from SL).

We were mismanaged…shockingly so.

Hopefully we will see 21/22’s accounts this week.

There was no doubt that the mismanagement was woeful, Webster sale saved the day to 2022, had Kelly occured in 2019-20 say that too would have given us more breathing space. Few million loss rather than that profit in 2018-19 but a profit in 2019-20...then again would the strategy have been doubled down on.

The revenue rises plus transfer profits, these eventually were more than eaten up by additional costs as you say.

A more pragmatic Cotts just in Year 1 and maybe he would have gained the b3nefit of the extra revenue and indeed the Kodjia sale amongst others.

What do we think the final profit on Webster was? Fee £20m, minus book value and sell on Ipswich...£14-15m perhaps?

I would say Webster helped to give the green light to the summer spree, Brownhill assisted wirh the January late flurry.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

image.thumb.png.ad28acbe0939cbb2945e8a79fc1386bc.png
(Holdings)

Revenue rose from £14.2m to £30.3m peak (dropped in 19/20 due to covid for last third of season).  That looks great, it more than doubled (113%).  But as you say ground development meant £14.2m was a false-bottom.  Even so, revenue grew by £16.1m, nice.

However, costs rose from £26.7m to £62.6m peak, a rise of £35.9m (134%).  For every £1.00 we increased revenue we spent £2.23 doing it.

It was masked by transfer profit.

The costs rose as follows:

image.thumb.png.4a7c761323a45da6e96555abe76f9e22.png

Wages doubled, a combo of paying too much and for too many.

Amortisation (figs above are amortisation plus depreciation) went from £2m to £14m, a seven-fold increase, burdening us for a few years as players contracts and their transfer fee costs were sunk.

Other costs went up, but in many respects, there if of course costs in raising revenue.  So it’s okay saying we’ve increased revenue, but we didn’t raise it efficiently, far from it.  As fans, in our naivety we thought the stadium development would bring in extra money at zero cost.  Nope.

What was our strategy:

  • buy young, develop, sell for a profit
  • develop our own players

We executed that first bullet well four times - Flint, Kodjia, Webster and Brownhill.  We have failed miserably on some - Diedhiou, Massengo, Kalas!  Some small wins - Eisa, Szmodics, Magnússon, Eliasson although transfer profit swallowed up with their wages over the period they were here.  Without Webster we would be in serious, serious trouble…although perversely we might not have gone out that season and spent £25m on:

image.thumb.png.e62115acf8cbb62b4d2669d40c3aa609.png

Re the second bullet, that’s been the real saving grace.  Reid, Bryan and Kelly, with Semenyo, Scott and Conway to come.  It is this area that will allow us to return to trying to be sustainable (albeit with a bit of funding from SL).

We were mismanaged…shockingly so.

Hopefully we will see 21/22’s accounts this week.

Were it down to me I'd pin your first 2 tables to the top of the forum for those who still can't see the near impossible circumstances Nigel is operating under.

Edited by chinapig
  • Like 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...