Jump to content
IGNORED

Ched Evans - 4 Game Ban For Foul On Alex Scott - Serves The Dirty Barsteward Right!


Curr Avon

Recommended Posts

  • The title was changed to Ched Evans - 4 Game Ban For Foul On Alex Scott - Serves The Dirty Barsteward Right!
4 minutes ago, Red Army 75 said:

Once again poor officiating could have cost us. Great they have banned him but it doesn’t affect us anymore. All this bad decisions even themselves out over the season. What a load of bollocks that is

The club will or have received a letter of apology from the PGMOL……..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ineptitude of the referee would have been pointed out by the assessor and the subsequent committee that has banned Evans. 
 

The Cunningham incident would have been looked at too so I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets a ban also. 
 

What shocks me is the belters on twitter who think Wells should have been sent off for his reaction to Cunningham dragging a set of studs down his leg! I guess victim blaming is endemic up there!

To be fair more than a couple of PNE fans said quite right about Evans and are waiting to hear about Cunningham knowing what he did. 
 

Nasty couple of evil barstewards.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, elhombrecito said:

Ref was looking directly at the incident (as he was with Cunningham on Wells). What's his excuse? 

Incompetence, also interesting to reflect on the booking count in the game: 4 for us, 1 (incredibly neither Evans or Cunningham were even booked) for them.

  • Like 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really want some feedback from or about Refs after a game. They deem it worthy of a 4 match ban, yet the Ref missed 2 incidents. The Wells one, Nakhi had the ball at his feet so the Ref had to bee looking at it. The Scott one from the video it looks like the Ref would have to look directly past Scott and Evans to follow the ball. Why don't we get some feedback or explanation about incidents like these. 
I know that the Powers that be will protect their own, but a little clarity would help. Let the Ref explain what he did or didn't see, not keep them in ivory towers and rely on some other office to try and right their mistakes retrospectivel.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sort of disappointed this came out after Nige's press conference. Though there is no telling with him (I thought he seemed relatively ambivalent with regards to the physical style the Pie Munchers served up in his post game interview), I always enjoy it when he gets the glint in his eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jerseybean said:

What makes me laugh is the word altercation. It implies that there was some sort of back and forth. 
 

Scott got  punched in the head from behind. That Evans is an evil ****, but I like Pearson’s attitude, we have got to learn how to play against sides like this and win. Something we haven’t done well since Gerry left!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

What makes me laugh is the word altercation. It implies that there was some sort of back and forth. 
 

Scott got  punched in the head from behind. That Evans is an evil ****, but I like Pearson’s attitude, we have got to learn how to play against sides like this and win. Something we haven’t done well since Gerry left!

The fact a 19yo completely dominated them is half of that equation.  

Still cannot believe Cunningham hasn't been banned (yet), as I would expect them to be announced at the same time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sir Geoff said:

From memory the referee was looking straight across at the Wells incident. He also clearly saw the Cunningham one on Scott. Both should have been dealt with and sent off on the day.

The Cunningham one was on Wells and the Evans was on Scott, but yes otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1960maaan said:

I really want some feedback from or about Refs after a game. They deem it worthy of a 4 match ban, yet the Ref missed 2 incidents. The Wells one, Nakhi had the ball at his feet so the Ref had to bee looking at it. The Scott one from the video it looks like the Ref would have to look directly past Scott and Evans to follow the ball. Why don't we get some feedback or explanation about incidents like these. 
I know that the Powers that be will protect their own, but a little clarity would help. Let the Ref explain what he did or didn't see, not keep them in ivory towers and rely on some other office to try and right their mistakes retrospectivel.

Nearly 30 years ago, when Martin Tyler used to commentate on Dutch football for ESPN, one of the features was interviewing the referee after the game. I just don't see the problem with refs explaining their decisions or saying they didn't see it. Like everyone else Referees are allowed to make genuine mistakes, and they make a lot less than players do, and those mistakes could cost us but a post match interview would make it seem more palatable. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REDOXO said:

What makes me laugh is the word altercation. It implies that there was some sort of back and forth. 
 

Scott got  punched in the head from behind. That Evans is an evil ****, but I like Pearson’s attitude, we have got to learn how to play against sides like this and win. Something we haven’t done well since Gerry left!

Yep. Think that performance against those dirty James Hunts could be a massive step forwards for our group.   Standing up to their physical intimidation and coming through whereas before we may have caved as a young group.   Big moment in the development of the team hopefully.   

Edited by lenred
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RoystonFoote'snephew said:

Nearly 30 years ago, when Martin Tyler used to commentate on Dutch football for ESPN, one of the features was interviewing the referee after the game. I just don't see the problem with refs explaining their decisions or saying they didn't see it. Like everyone else Referees are allowed to make genuine mistakes, and they make a lot less than players do, and those mistakes could cost us but a post match interview would make it seem more palatable. 

Exactly. Even if they make an excuse of not seeing the incident, just having their view would take some of the frustration away. He may have followed the ball and missed both incidents, which would be bad enough, not hearing him say he missed it make him appear incompetent .

25 minutes ago, bearded_red said:

How far away are we from being awarded penalties on the Friday after the game?

Morgan Freeman Applause GIF by The Academy Awards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Hello Dave said:

Am I the only one not seeing a lot in this? Ok, it was a sending off, but is it really that violent. Looks more of a grab than a punch. 

What you won't see from this angle, but was clear from the live feed, is that Evans stamps on the back of Alex's leg.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, lenred said:

Yep. Think that performance against those dirty James Hunts could be a massive step forwards for our group.   Standing up to their physical intimidation and coming through whereas before we may have caved as a young group.   Big moment in the development of the team hopefully.   

Problem is we had the likes of Ian Gay and Tony Wilkins absolutely going mental about how we were playing. Calling for Pearsons head without actually understanding how it takes a long time for a group of players, especially young players to take that step forward and be able to see games out. 

Listening to how Tony Wilkins was on the radio the other night was comical. 

How these people get air time I don't know.

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

Problem is we had the likes of Ian Gay and Tony Wilkins absolutely going mental about how we were playing. Calling for Pearsons head without actually understanding how it takes a long time for a group of players, especially young players to take that step forward and be able to see games out. 

Listening to how Tony Wilkins was on the radio the other night was comical. 

How these people get air time I don't know.

 

Emptiest vessels make the loudest noise...

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hello Dave said:

Am I the only one not seeing a lot in this? Ok, it was a sending off, but is it really that violent. Looks more of a grab than a punch. 

Only because he missed his punch and caught with his arm instead, he was clearly trying to knock him out luckily he's rubbish boxer as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Good spot that, that was very much the cowardly bit I referred to. It's not immediately visible without watching a few times but nasty, cowardly.

It was blatantly obvious to anyone watching in real time (including the referee who was looking directly at it). He mis timed his punch then followed up with a stamp.

  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Curr Avon said:

And here's the incident in the bottom clip....

 

Remember thinking at the time that it was right in the refs eye line  & did nothing. He’s abysmal . Was equally poor in the fa cup game during the week . Should never be officiating in the football league. Shows how poor the standard of reffing is that he keeps getting games. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

Problem is we had the likes of Ian Gay and Tony Wilkins absolutely going mental about how we were playing. Calling for Pearsons head without actually understanding how it takes a long time for a group of players, especially young players to take that step forward and be able to see games out. 

Listening to how Tony Wilkins was on the radio the other night was comical. 

How these people get air time I don't know.

Fair play to you for being able to do so, absolutely clueless, the pair of them. The bar could not be set any lower than having him on, he’s worse than Ian Gay.

Wilkins actually said on Twitter he wouldn’t miss Richard Gould because he couldn’t think of anything he had done in his time here.

******* idiot.

Edited by GrahamC
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Selred said:

Had a yellow card, so action already happened. 

Cunningham didn’t get yellow carded at all, only Wells did.  How does that work?

2 hours ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

Problem is we had the likes of Ian Gay and Tony Wilkins absolutely going mental about how we were playing. Calling for Pearsons head without actually understanding how it takes a long time for a group of players, especially young players to take that step forward and be able to see games out. 

Listening to how Tony Wilkins was on the radio the other night was comical. 

How these people get air time I don't know.

I can’t listen to him, after his rant post-match pre-Xmas, he’s just a parody of himself.  He makes Ian seem like a football super-brain.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, REDOXO said:

What shocks me is the belters on twitter who think Wells should have been sent off for his reaction to Cunningham dragging a set of studs down his leg!

I thought Wells was very lucky not have received a red card. He lost it with Cunningham and he raised his arms to him which would , with a normal ref, vindicate a sending off. 
I understand completely his reaction but he was out of control. 
Cunningham should have been sent off at least twice. What a synt that bloke is. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Red Army 75 said:

Once again poor officiating could have cost us. Great they have banned him but it doesn’t affect us anymore. All this bad decisions even themselves out over the season. What a load of bollocks that is

Agreed. If it were true that it evens out then we’re heading for the playoffs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Cunningham didn’t get yellow carded at all, only Wells did.  How does that work?

I can’t listen to him, after his rant post-match pre-Xmas, he’s just a parody of himself.  He makes Ian seem like a football super-brain.

So I'm not the only one that turns the radio down when he comes on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Major Isewater said:

I thought Wells was very lucky not have received a red card. He lost it with Cunningham and he raised his arms to him which would , with a normal ref, vindicate a sending off. 
I understand completely his reaction but he was out of control. 
Cunningham should have been sent off at least twice. What a synt that bloke is. 

He was the same ref who booked luke freeman in the same incident that saw sykes sent off against Luton. So if there was one thing this ref got right, it was consistency. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Cunningham didn’t get yellow carded at all, only Wells did.  How does that work?

I can’t listen to him, after his rant post-match pre-Xmas, he’s just a parody of himself.  He makes Ian seem like a football super-brain.

I honestly can't see what he brings to the table. His footballing knowledge is very limited and on Monday he could barely string two sentences together. 

I think he just likes the attention. On Saturday he tweeted in saying he was unable to call in because he was the designated driver. Think he has delusions of grandeur. 

Unfortunately a lot of our fans listen to opinions like his and follow like sheep.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

I honestly can't see what he brings to the table. His footballing knowledge is very limited and on Monday he could barely string two sentences together. 

I think he just likes the attention. On Saturday he tweeted in saying he was unable to call in because he was the designated driver. Think he has delusions of grandeur. 

Unfortunately a lot of our fans listen to opinions like his and follow like sheep.

It's not just that our fans though, my father in law said to me the other day, "oh, you're all happy now, at Xmas you ALL wanted him sacked". I told him he had been listening to the wrong people, but it's all a stick to beat us with.

I rarely listen to Radio Bristol after games, even when we win, I am sure you are aware that Radio Bristol ring those rentomouths, not the other way around, that's why you rarely get fresh insight or broader spectrum of opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Percy Pig said:

Should see his political opinions. Working class tories... Turkeys who vote for Christmas. 

 

I know, I had a big argument with him about Brexit and medicine shortages for Joe.  His view was “it’ll be alright, just speak to your GP, they’ll sort it”.  Guess what?  Firstly, the usual brand disappeared from prescription, now the only other alternative brand has too. Joe has had to move onto adult versions because they can’t get the child ones.  Imagine thinking a GP will be able to sort out medical supply chains?  I rarely block people on twitter, but he’s one I do.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...