joe jordans teeth Posted July 1, 2023 Report Share Posted July 1, 2023 13 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said: It's a case of law v reality. Legally a player has a contract of employment with a club. The player provides services, and the club pays him for that. Both promise to do that for a set period of time. Other rights and obligations exist, but those are the main ones. The basic law of contract says that you can change a contract if all parties agree and it's done in the same form as the original contract. This is why managers often leave by "mutual consent". The club/manager mutually consent to each other breaking their side of the contract. With a player then, as a legal position (and assuming no special terms exist), the contract exists, and the club cannot terminate the contract unilaterally without being sued by the player and paying out the rest of the promised wages (and other benefits). This is fundamentally why transfer fees exist. A transfer "fee" is in effect the purchasing club compensating the selling club for its costs incurred when it breaks the contract with the player that moves. Hence a player with more years in his contract goes for a higher fee, and one with 0 years left leaves "on a free". Now, in reality, if a club can not only cover its costs, but also make a profit in receiving such compensation, then it is actually in their interest to terminate the contract and "sell" the player. Here, if the player resists the move it does not accept the new contract he is being offered he will be in one of a few positions: 1. His employer is angry with him and so he falls out with them and they don't play him and he rots. Some players accept this option (Rodwell, Bogarde etc) and happily see out their contract, receiving payment, training, but happily being lost in the wilderness; 2. Technically I guess the club could terminate the contract, but they'd have to pay out the player under normal employment rules. Expensive, and pointless. 3. Maybe the contract is mutually terminated, at which point the player chances his arm and free agent. Either way, it's clear why in reality the most attractive option for all parties is to transfer the player's registration to a new club. Hence the transfer market exists. This is a simplified version. Agents, standard contract clauses, FIFA's regs, and other laws influence things, but this basic contract law underpins it all. So in answer to @Robbored - yes he could legally refuse, but why on earth would be do that? In a year he’s going to be on a free near enough so why would you sign for let’s say a Wolves if they are the only club bidding,his agent will be telling him wait and pocket the transfer fee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pride of the west Posted July 1, 2023 Report Share Posted July 1, 2023 To be fair to RR there have been plenty of anecdotes from former players saying their club accepted an offer and told them they are going and they didn't even know where the club was on the map. Granted this is usually stories from years ago and no doubt its exaggerated a bit. But this day and age it's common knowledge players just sit on contracts and refuse to move Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted July 1, 2023 Report Share Posted July 1, 2023 10 hours ago, CodeRed said: Of course he can't refuse. He has to go, the BCFC coaching staff will handcuff him to the railings at the HPC until West Ham (or whoever) arrive to transport him to a 5 bed new build with gym,cinema room, and pool in Chigwell, there he will remain under house arrest and only allowed out to train, play, visit Spearmint Rhinos, get tattooed , or romp with potential wannabe wags on the make. Summer trips to Marbella, Vegas, and Dubai (to buy Rolex watches) are conditional on good behaviour. All this info is freely available on the OS - do keep up. Woweeee free market professional perks there . Nice and cushty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted July 1, 2023 Report Share Posted July 1, 2023 (edited) 12 hours ago, Eddie Hitler said: Why then do most of the Rovers' new signings look like someone is pointing a gun at them off camera to make them hold up the shirt? Because why else would you sign for Rovers other being at gun point Edited July 1, 2023 by Rocking Red Cyril Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curr Avon Posted July 1, 2023 Report Share Posted July 1, 2023 11 hours ago, bearded_red said: Jesus wept. He cried off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oh Louie louie Posted July 2, 2023 Report Share Posted July 2, 2023 Can recall a deal had been agreed for one of my all-time favourite players, Frank Worthington to Liverpool, there was a rumour Frank had picked up a a non football injury, in the bedroom and Liverpool said no, was total rubbish Frank laughed it off and revealed it was due to a heart issue I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted July 2, 2023 Report Share Posted July 2, 2023 31 minutes ago, TomF said: Going back a fair old way back I recall Kevin Davies turning us down when he was at Chesterfield I think that was Chesterfield going back on the deal. IIRC we had agreed to sign him and then he got a hat trick away at Bolton in the Cup and Southampton (?) came in with a much bigger bid so he went there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Hitler Posted July 2, 2023 Report Share Posted July 2, 2023 And of course there was Zach Clough. Or rather his dad. A month into the 2015–16 season, Clough dislocated his other shoulder and ruled him out for 3 months. In January 2016, a number of clubs including Everton [13] and Bristol City were interested in signing Clough. Bristol City had a £3,000,000 bid accepted however, Clough said that he wished to stay at Bolton so turned down his contract offer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zach_Clough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted July 2, 2023 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2023 21 hours ago, Monkeh said: Yes, a player can turn down a contract or even refuse to talk to a club That’s exactly what I wanted to know - until recently I’d never given much thought to a player rights in any transfer. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchred Posted July 2, 2023 Report Share Posted July 2, 2023 21 hours ago, bearded_red said: Jesus wept. Did he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.