Jump to content
IGNORED

Scott Twine - Loan Confirmed - No option to buy


Shauntaylor85

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Cov 77 said:

Not seeing that to be honest , hopefully option to buy but a step up on what we’ve got, why is it desperate ? I  think because as far as the majority of this FANS forum our season is over, we are 4 points if the playoffs ffs😤

The next five games decides whether we have a season or not.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, !james said:

All seems very pointless.

He does well and Burnley say he'll cost £5 million or they come down and want him back. 

Rather have someone who is here long term 

That's a good point, Burnley could well be a Championship club next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, frenchred said:

I just don't get the negativity!

When Pearson was here most people were saying why don't he loan players!

Pathetic

Yea when it will help us and is worth it. Without Twine we survive and miss out on PO’s. With Twine we survive and miss out on PO’s and lose a few million.

Edited by BCFCGav
  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, !james said:

All seems very pointless.

He does well and Burnley say he'll cost £5 million or they come down and want him back. 

Rather have someone who is here long term 

He does well then the likelihood is that the club has done well also.

So with us being 4 points off playoffs that would indicate at the very least catching up with those we're chasing.

 

Even if we fell short that would leave us in a stronger position when recruiting others for next season.

 

Don't go slashing your wrists yet.

 

This forum is ******* pathetic at times.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, johnheadbcfc said:

You lot must be a right laugh at partys😂😂

What’s to be happy about then?  

We’re going nowhere this season anyway, so we’ll just be keeping one of Burnley’s players match fit for them next season.  Would rather see us pick jp a young player from the lower leagues and bring them on for ourselves, rather than helping out what will be a Championship rival next year.

How can you possibly be happy with this situation??

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, James54De said:

Seems odd, from a business sense. Our season is as good as done, so seems money unnecessarily spent. 

I wanted an option but give your head a wobble.

We are 4 points away from the playoffs. It's unlikely but more possible with a new addition.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BCFCGav said:

Yea when it will help us and is worth it. Without Twine we survive and miss out on PO’s. With Twine we survive and miss out and PO’s and lose a few million.

Might aswel sign no-one because it's pointless then, followed by a forum meltdown for lack of ambition.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hull don’t have an option to buy Fabio Carvalho or Liam Delap, but I don’t see their fans moaning. They know that their loan signings improve them, even if it is only temporarily. 
 

Ask yourselves a simple question… 
 

Does Scott Twine improve us? 
The answer is yes. 
 

Of course we all would have hoped for a permanent deal, but we’ve managed to bring him in regardless, and that seems like a great signing to me. 
 

Nottingham Forest got into the play-offs after securing Keinan Davis and Djed Spence on loan. They didn’t end up signing either permanently, but progressed as a club. 
 

We are a few points off the play-offs and have signed a player which has improved the squad.

Let’s take the positives for once.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the point of this :

- he does well then Burnley want him back and he plays for them in the champ!!!

- he does well and Burnley want to sell bigger clubs come in and pay bigger wages!!!!

- he ain’t taking us up we’ve had 3 shots in 3 games!!!

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Facepalm 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Randy Marsh II said:

Yeh my enthusiasm to this has dropped if it's solely a loan. We're just giving him game time ahead of Burnley coming back down. 

Just doing them a favour. 

and paying for the privilege no doubt.

Good player, no doubt, but without an option to buy, we're paying Burnley to keep a player fit for them.

I don't see the point at all without an option. 🤷 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Confirmed there’s no option to buy. 

I’ll be honest, stinks of a bit of desperate and feels a bit pointless. 

Why? You  said we can’t afford it - so why not a loan. Might make matches more enjoyable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good player.

To counter those who are dismissing this, he's opening up our availability for the summer. If he earns us 2-3 places, even if we finish 7th or 8th, we are a significantly more attractive proposition regardless. It gets us closer to a Manning side. I am excited personally. 

UTFC

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AshtonRobin21 said:

Hull don’t have an option to buy Fabio Carvalho or Liam Delap, but I don’t see their fans moaning. They know that their loan signings improve them, even if it is only temporarily. 
 

Ask yourselves a simple question… 
 

Does Scott Twine improve us? 
The answer is yes. 
 

Of course we all would have hoped for a permanent deal, but we’ve managed to bring him in regardless, and that seems like a great signing to me. 
 

Nottingham Forest got into the play-offs after securing Keinan Davis and Djed Spence on loan. They didn’t end up signing either permanently, but progressed as a club. 
 

We are a few points off the play-offs and have signed a player which has improved the squad.

Let’s take the positives for once.

He also costs money where the fruits go into Burnley’s pockets ffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So so disappointing. No reflection on Twine but from making Nige save us from a financial shit-hole then giving him peanuts to spending millions on a loan to finish mid-table when he’s gone? The people running this club leave me utterly dumbstruck at times.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, frenchred said:

I just don't get the negativity!

When Pearson was here most people were saying why don't he loan players!

Pathetic

Or maybe not everyone on here has the same opinions. You’re more likely to post if you disagreed with Pearson’s no loan policy, it’d be a bit weird of me to post each day that I agreed with it to give that public backing. 
 

Now those who were in that camp but not posting will likely post that they disagree with signing someone on loan with no agreed future fee set.

 

I’d feel differently if we had a TGH style loan or we stood closer to the relegation or promotion places. Now if he does well here, Burnley either up the fee or keep him themselves and we wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.

 

I’m pleased with the identity of the signing, I’m not pleased with the deal struck.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ZiderEyed said:

Good player.

To counter those who are dismissing this, he's opening up our availability for the summer. If he earns us 2-3 places, even if we finish 7th or 8th, we are a significantly more attractive proposition regardless. It gets us closer to a Manning side. I am excited personally. 

UTFC

Yea and then boro or Stoke come in and pay double the wages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to say it feels like pointless business if it’s a loan with no option to buy.

Burnley will come down next season, so we’re getting him ready for them to p*ss the league again. 
 

Desperate.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...