Ecko Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 http://www.wolves.premiumtv.co.uk/page/New...1308353,00.html Go get him Gary! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 not good enough for Wolves, Not good enough for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecko Posted May 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 not good enough for Wolves, Not good enough for us You crazy?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 I would like him at city but he will end up at coventry something to do with towing the caravan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 You crazy?! No 4 goals all season would get better value for money, in just giving byfield a new contract than wasting silly money on a player like Eastwood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecko Posted May 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 No 4 goals all season would get better value for money, in just giving byfield a new contract than wasting silly money on a player like Eastwood Showunmi and Byfield out Eastwood and possibly another in Can't believe that you think Byfield is better than Eastwood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chowie Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 not good enough for Wolves, Not good enough for us Just like Marvin Elliott was not good enough for Millwal.. It's just not worked out for him there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Showunmi and Byfield out Eastwood and possibly another in Can't believe that you think Byfield is better than Eastwood. not better, but if in this division, I'd say byfield would be better value for money and possibly with a better goal return there isn't a cat in hells chance of us going for Eastwood - why would we? - has shown this season he isn't good enough if we go up...........Eastwood in the Prem........comical if we stay down.....I'd rather go with someone who will improve in the future, Maynard or Vokes would be ideal signis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezgimed Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Bh did you not see City 0 - 3 Eastwood a couple of seasons back? Or Eastwood for Wales? He is a decent decent player, just Mick hasnt a clue how to make the most of his resources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denilson Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Watch some of these. Then say you wouldnt like him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunley Legend Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 not good enough for Wolves, Not good enough for us So I take it you weren't very impressed with the signing of McIndoe then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denilson Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Another one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolman Block B Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Watch some of these. Then say you wouldnt like him That is impressive. Wonder if GJ could get the best out of him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Horsman Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 The Wolves fans love him, and 4 goals or not, he's not become a bad player overnight. I would be happy to get Eastwood in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Bh did you not see City 0 - 3 Eastwood a couple of seasons back? Or Eastwood for Wales? He is a decent decent player, just Mick hasnt a clue how to make the most of his resources. mick sure worked out how to make the best out of signings like Kightly and Ebanks-Blake though didn't he? yes I remember Eastwood for Southend....in LEAGUE ONE while we were in the middle of our bad run after GJ had taken over and everyone was beating us, it was the game that johnson dropped his infamous hand grenade just afterwards. and for Wales....yes he was excellent...AGAINST LUXEMBOURG!!! just don't rate him. he has cost Wolves £1.5m 12months ago, when he was set to join Cov in Jan it was for around £1.5-£2m he's already shown this season that at a bigger club he can't adjust, though he did quite very wellas big fish in a small pond at Southend, when the whole team played towards him, but he still only got 11goals in this divsion Personally I'm aiming for City to go up, in which case singing Eastwood would be unversially no doubt described as stupid. IF we stay down I'd rather be going for somone with better long-term potential and who will cost a probably lower transfer fee and definately lower wages, such as Sam Vokes, Nicky Maynard or even Joe Garner once he's fit again. instead of blowing £1.5m+ plus paying out top whack championship wages for a player who has already flopped at this level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22A Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Eastwood and possibly another in Andy (20 goals in 30 games for City) Cole has been released by Sunderland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denilson Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 The good thing about him is. He scores with left and right, he's quite good in the air, can run at people, and has a bit of pace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 So I take it you weren't very impressed with the signing of McIndoe then? when we signed McIndoe though, he was a regular at Wolves . not a fringe player such as Eastwood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIZZYRED Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 not good enough for Wolves, Not good enough for us Thats my thoughts too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_man_terry Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 ok in the lower leagues, but found out at this level no ta, especially not at the money that wolves will want Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_man_terry Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Exactly. Easily good enough for the Championship regardless of his time at Wolves. He's be a great acquisition....but he's going to Coventry City. 15 league goals in 2 seasons. PERSONALLY speaking, I don't find that overly impressive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezgimed Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 15 league goals in 2 seasons. PERSONALLY speaking, I don't find that overly impressive Come on, you can use stats to prove anything in the world. Alot of his goals are top quality, doesnt matter what League you're in. He obviously hasnt had time to settle at this division and have a regular run of games, which I bet he needs. He would certainly be better than Byfield/Enoch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATT BCFC Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Got to take in consideration hes only started 12 games. Even top quality strikers would struggle without a run of games. Also think our style of football would suit him better than wolves hes a plyer who needs the ball to feet or in behind, Mick Mccarthy is a bit of a hoofball manager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_man_terry Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Personally, I don't think that stat is worth consideration. He's been selected for 12 starts this season with 23 short lived appearances from the bench. Stats mean nothing without context. Eastwood is a class above anything we have got in terms of finding the net and he'd be a very valuable addition to the squad. And he'd cost way below a million quid. either way, 4 league goals this season and 11 last. nothing to write home about. your whole basis on signing him is based on us staying down? which is very negative as is the signing of eastwood as a whole. not sure where why you reckon "he'd cost way below a million quid" as others have mentioned he cost £1.5m and Wolves aren't going to be willing to lose a large amount of cash on the transfer, when he was on the verge of joining Cov in Jan, it was for "£1.5m to £2m" I'd imagine he will cost around £1.2-£1.5m for that money there is more sensible alternatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_man_terry Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Come on, you can use stats to prove anything in the world. Alot of his goals are top quality, doesnt matter what League you're in. He obviously hasnt had time to settle at this division and have a regular run of games, which I bet he needs. He would certainly be better than Byfield/Enoch. but people said the same about trundle...and look at his goal record. 4 this and 11 last season in the league. even if we stayed down.......I'd look elsewhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BITW Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Would deffo be a good signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whale Eye Beef Hooked Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 At Wolves he was always last into training, first to leave had a stinking attitude and when he was booked to do functions for the club ( schools, open days etc ) he wouldn't show up. Now, that is either down to a clash with MM or he has got a shiiite attitude. If he has then he is certainly not a GJ type player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_man_terry Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 QUOTE (old_man_terry @ May 8 2008, 9:42 PM) * either way, 4 league goals this season and 11 last. nothing to write home about. your whole basis on signing him is based on us staying down? which is very negative as is the signing of eastwood as a whole. No. I said he is easily good enough for the Championship and, in my opinion, good enough for the Premier League - we aint going to compete at the top end are we. not sure where why you reckon "he'd cost way below a million quid" as others have mentioned he cost £1.5m and Wolves aren't going to be willing to lose a large amount of cash on the transfer, when he was on the verge of joining Cov in Jan, it was for "£1.5m to £2m" I'd imagine he will cost around £1.2-£1.5m for that money there is more sensible alternatives. McCarthy wants rid and Eastwood wants out. They won't bugger around asking silly money, my guess is around 750k plus add-ons. Coventry could never have afforded anything like £1m at that time - they were a week off of administration at one point and had difficulty in paying wages. They were skint. Offload Enoch and Byfield and the money is there for a quality replacement. so you belive getting shot of Enoch and Byfield will fund a quality replacement? you do realise they are both out of contract so there will be no transfer fee's incoming? as for the Coventry deal, it was all set to complete at the end of the loan window (my mistake not jan) as it was a loan then, but perm in the summer, £1.5m-£2m in the summer but Wolves pulled the plug at the last minute, you do realise they have been taken over? hence Dowie out, Chris Coleman in. you also say he is more than good enough for the championship and maybe good enough for the prem? are you actually serious? 15 goals in 2 seasons at this level, personally I think he is average championship player if that, but not the kind of player you want to sign if your serious about pushing out of this league the right way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_man_terry Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 Of course I realise that they've been taken over by Ray Ransons group. But I still maintain that Coventry were in no position to be able to guarantee paying that sort of money at the end of the season at that time. Yes, deadly serious. I can't believe you look at a statistic and write a player off. Thank God you aint the manager of BCFC. Enough already. but surely the fact that they were on the verge of signing him until Wolves pulled the plug last min (because Cov wanted to play him against Wolves) is a sign that they were going to sign him at obviously were going to sign him. see below one of the various links on the story http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-s...97319-20683283/ it's not about looking at a statistic, it's a simple fact that in the lower divsions he scored alot, but in his 2 seasons at this level he's scored 15 goals and yet you declare him to be a top striker.......based on what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedsred Posted May 8, 2008 Report Share Posted May 8, 2008 but surely the fact that they were on the verge of signing him until Wolves pulled the plug last min (because Cov wanted to play him against Wolves) is a sign that they were going to sign him at obviously were going to sign him. see below one of the various links on the story http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-s...97319-20683283/ it's not about looking at a statistic, it's a simple fact that in the lower divsions he scored alot, but in his 2 seasons at this level he's scored 15 goals and yet you declare him to be a top striker.......based on what? love the quote from MM 'he's not my type and maybe i'm not his'!! Perhaps a lovers tiff?? GJ's motto is (perhaps not exactly in these words but along the lines of) 'the easiest way to motivate a player is to find a player who can be motivated'. A good striker with raw ability and the attributes to be a good player in the championship... sounds perfect for a bit of Johnson magic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.