Jump to content
IGNORED

Adam Webster - Update - Sold to Brighton


Red Army 75

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

Bye bye Webby. 

You go with our best wishes and I hope you make a real go of it in the Prem.

We thought Flinty was irreplaceable, and you showed us that it could be done - and in many ways could be done better!

Anyway, kerching! and onwards and upwards.

No need to compare with Flint really.

Webster cost us 10x more than Flint, and we sold Flint for 20x what we paid for him, 'only' 6x in Webster's case.

Flint gave City 5 very solid seasons ( including palpable achievement for the club) Webster just 1 season, albeit a superb one individually.

Having said there's no reason to compare them, there I am doing it - but for me it feels like Webster knew he was never going to be here too long if he could prove his fitness over a season, whereas Flint gave his all for 5.

It almost seems like we had Webster on loan for a year and he's returned to his parent club, except for the whacking great profit!

Anyway, as you say, 'kerching, onwards and upwards', and hopefully another great replacement on the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MC RISK77 said:

He has just tweeted

An absolute dream come true to sign for @OfficialBHAFC cannot wait to get started ?

was his dream to play for Brighton, hopefully their is at least at acknowledgement later In the day for city

He's already said how much he loved coming to City on Brighton's official site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MC RISK77 said:

He has just tweeted

An absolute dream come true to sign for @OfficialBHAFC cannot wait to get started ?

was his dream to play for Brighton, hopefully their is at least at acknowledgement later In the day for city

Footballers have some weird dreams.

8 of them dreamed of unemployment and uncertain futures if Section82 are to be believed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those saying we are weaker than we were in May... we now have kalas and dasilva signed up. They weren't ours in May. So we have a stronger squad 5gat is ours... and although not necessarily a stronger team as of yet it shows we are making progress. Think I'd personally rather have kalas and dasilva than Webster... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BCFC Grim said:

Imagine smashing your transfer fee record and still feeling disheartened by the summer activity. We are weaker than back in May. Trying to be positive but struggling.

Disagree. We had players that were here on loan and they would have been leaving, so in reality at the end of the season we were very weak because those loans were not on our books. We have signed Dasilva, Palmer and Kalas for a record fee (and all for less than Kelly who wasn't even a first team starter). We have got Szmodic in, and a decent keeper who could be a longterm player for us.

Yes we have just sold probably our best player but for the fee we got after just one season it really is terrific business. We still have Baker and if he is fit and consistent he is a very, very good Championship defender. We also have Wright, Taylor Moore and Vyner as back up and expect Taylor Moore will soon get given a chance (or what is the point). We have to accept we will sell players at a huge profit if it is available, and there is certainly no guarantee by keeping them we would make the promised land. We have to become a sustainable club and doing business as we currently are is the only way to do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get the point others make about being 'stronger' because transfers become permanent cf temporary. They're yours to use for the period of contract.

Most clubs who've successfully breached the gap to the top have done so taking superior players they couldn't afford to buy, but for whom they splashed cash on wages. I'd argue that at the top end of the Championship that's probably the only way non-parachute clubs can conpete, though interesting to see how the loan change rules will impact?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BTRFTG said:

I really don't get the point others make about being 'stronger' because transfers become permanent cf temporary. They're yours to use for the period of contract.

Most clubs who've successfully breached the gap to the top have done so taking superior players they couldn't afford to buy, but for whom they splashed cash on wages. I'd argue that at the top end of the Championship that's probably the only way non-parachute clubs can conpete, though interesting to see how the loan change rules will impact?

We are weaker. People can try and dress it up as they like. We've lost our best player and taken a gamble on a lower league player( I actually think it will pay off). Fingers crossed I won't be saying the same thing next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

I really don't get the point others make about being 'stronger' because transfers become permanent cf temporary. They're yours to use for the period of contract.

Most clubs who've successfully breached the gap to the top have done so taking superior players they couldn't afford to buy, but for whom they splashed cash on wages. I'd argue that at the top end of the Championship that's probably the only way non-parachute clubs can conpete, though interesting to see how the loan change rules will impact?

If you’re a consultant working for a company, you never truly ‘belong’, you don’t put down roots - you’re a specialist brought in to do a job for a limited period. It can make a consultant a bit of a mercenary. It’s akin to a footballer being on loan. 

Becoming a permanent employee makes you far more integral - changing your attitude towards the company and the company’s towards you. 

Signing our former loanees will, I believe, help them feel part of the long term strategy of the club. It’ll also help in making us far more attractive to other prospective Prem loanees whether from Chelsea eg Hector, or other clubs eg Nketiah. 

Imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely sensational transfer for City, Ipswich and of course Adam Webster;  not so sure it's a sensational transfer for Brighton, he may well flop in the Prem League - doubtful, but you never know.

I salute all parties involved in the sale of Webster and think the money we have received is awesome.

Just think how well we will now invest that money.  I may be thinking rather simplistically, but this should mean the star striker we need can now be financed.

I would do whatever it takes now to sign Dwight Gayle, a guarantee of at least 20 goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

Becoming a permanent employee

Save none are 'permanent employees' - BCFC are not John Lewis Partnership.

Players remain akin consultants for as long as their contracts last, rarely greater than 4 seasons. How then do you explain players like 'the mock mick' who's still under contract yet doesn't  believe himself to be 'valued' as an employee given he's tried every trick in the book to get away, as did Maynard, as did.....(insert name here?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to feel for LJ. Last season he lost 3 of his best players. Did a brilliant job signing Webster and loses him a day before the season starts.

It's all very well having money to spend. We got it right with Webster but there are no guarantees that we can keep doing so. Puts a lot of pressure on LJ to roll the dice again and come up with another hit.

We've signed a few duds and some gems. Just hope we get it right this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BTRFTG said:

We're a selling club and until such time as we conceivably might compete to reach the top flight (not anytime soon IMHO) that's what we'll remain.

Webster and Kelly deals too good to turn down for a club shipping £20m and upwards a year.

My gripe is yet again under WeeLee this happens the day the season starts. Where's the longer term succession planning? Another close season where fans know we need a minimum two strikers, plus holding and creative midfielder yet the management focus on keepers and development opportunities that rarely materialize. Spent big money on decent players for our level, but only to retain what we had last year where we didn't exactly set the league alight.

I really hope we start like a house on fire such we might attract some decent loanees as should the wheels come off first two games i dread to think how this season might go? I know little of Sammy S but who else is going to 'step-up'?

Ah, the “selling club” accusation.

Please tell me who isn’t a “selling club” when a huge offer for a player comes in from a team in a higher division capable of paying higher wages and the player wants to leave?

We’re a club that’s just made a £15m-odd profit on a player in 12 months, having sold our better players the previous season and yet still continued our upward trajectory with a fifth season of consecutive improvement. That proves we are currently making shrewd business decisions. The timing isn’t ideal, but we don’t have complete control over that, and with the transfer window still open and money in our pocket, I’m willing to give Johnson and Ashton the benefit of the doubt right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bristolcitysweden said:

When will we see a footballer with a working brain thinking long term underatanding he is on astronomic money as it is

The minute they don't have agents?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BCFC Grim said:

We are weaker. People can try and dress it up as they like. We've lost our best player and taken a gamble on a lower league player( I actually think it will pay off). Fingers crossed I won't be saying the same thing next week.

How about we wait and see if we are weaker once we have spent the money yea? 

I didn't know that the transfer window closed straight after Webster signed for Brighton. Geez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

Save none are 'permanent employees' - BCFC are not John Lewis Partnership.

Players remain akin consultants for as long as their contracts last, rarely greater than 4 seasons. How then do you explain players like 'the mock mick' who's still under contract yet doesn't  believe himself to be 'valued' as an employee given he's tried every trick in the book to get away, as did Maynard, as did.....(insert name here?)

It’s not a perfect analogy. As you well know, football doesn’t conform with the conventions of any other business but you’ll no doubt understand the comparison I made.

Palmer, for instance now knows where he and is family are likely to live for more than nine months. He’ll be able to come home from work every night to see his little boy which will settle them all. They can plan schools and become part of their community. That’s got to be good and help him play better on the field?

Regarding O’Dowda he’s effectively handed in his notice but until he leaves he’s our asset and we have to sweat it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Up The City! said:

How about we wait and see if we are weaker once we have spent the money yea? 

I didn't know that the transfer window closed straight after Webster signed for Brighton. Geez.

How about you read my post properly?  I said fingers crossed we arnt weaker in a weeks time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...