Jump to content

David Brent

Members
  • Posts

    6012
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by David Brent

  1. 2 hours ago, RedDave said:

    They put them under General Sport I see. I didn't go hunting too far to be honest.  Perhaps we should have a Rovers part of the forum for threads like this 

    It's all under a thread named, rather conveniently, "Bristol Rovers"

     

    • Like 1
  2. 7 minutes ago, Jack Dawe said:

    One way to tell a billionaire is, what do they own?

     

    Central London property/multiple properties

    Enormous Yachts

    Helicopters

    Fourth division football club

     

    That sort of thing

     

    He's got a very nice watch.

    The Bristol Post told us so.

    Just in case you've forgotten 

    http://m.bristolpost.co.uk/New-Bristol-Rovers-owner-Wael-Al-Qadi-joins-likes/story-28807661-detail/story.html

    • Like 1
  3. I have heard the word "flip" used as an insulting term referring to Filipinos; I suppose adding 'ing' would suggest you are insulting more than one filipino! So, as long as you don't come here, go on a cruise or go to an average UK hospital you can say it at will me babber.

     

     

     

    I best save it until I meet the Filipino Bristol Rovers fan club (why wouldn't there be one..?)then, just to be on the safe side.

  4. Seems strangr were discussing a deal with forest to extend gillets loan if when everyone is fit he is only on the bench. Thought we were going to sign players that are better than we already have, hence Barnett coming in and Taylor leaving.

    Would have started gillet today.

    Maybe at home. I'm sure Elliot is playing due to Bradford aerial threat. A squad should provide different options.

  5. There have been mixed views about SoD. It seems to be 50 - 50 on he should have been given more time v I'm glad he's gone.

    At the same time there has been almost 100% criticism of Jon Lansdown / the board. I'm not a great fan of either but a lot of the criticism is, IMO, unfounded. Many people have said that SoD had to work under financial constraints which is true to a certain degree. However the board backed him to bring in a lot of players, either permanent signings or on loan, who should be good at league 1 level. The budget he was given was more than a lot of teams in this league - e.g Lee Johnson has a budget of approx 75p at Oldham.

    The board also gave SoD plenty of time when other clubs would have panicked and sacked him much earlier. If he had to go, now is the time, as it gives a new manager time to look at the players before the January window

    I find the fact that its 50/50 on SOD strange.

    Most managers are sacked when there's a clear majority against them?

    Something has happened. Perhaps he questioned Jon Lansdowns credentials when he refused to sanction a loan signing. Just guessing.

×
×
  • Create New...