Jump to content

bearded_red

Members
  • Posts

    3403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by bearded_red

  1. 27 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

    If they stick to their policy I think it would mean Wood comes in for him and Broad replaces Anderson. They must be tempted to just bring Broad in for Archer though 

    Wood isn’t there until the third test.

  2. 6 minutes ago, Lew-T said:

    Pant and others were obviously targeting Leach. Pant was even giving Bess respect at the other end...

    Let’s see if he can win us the game seeing as it’s a minefield.

    It wasn’t ‘Pant and others’ was it, it was Pant. His economy was under two against every other batsman.

    If he was targeting Leach (I’m not sure you’ve seen much of Pant if you think he targets specific bowlers), it’s because he spins it into him and Bess is the more dangerous bowler to left handers as he spins it away. Bearing in mind Pant’s dismissal, I’m not sure how much respect was being shown there, but there we go.

    Yeah because if he doesn’t bowl out Gill, Pujara, Kohli, Rahane, Pant and Sundar in India that will definitively prove you right that he’s village..

    A bloke with 44 wickets in 12 tests and over three hundred first class wickets at twenty six. Village. 
     
    I’d hate to know how you describe the utter dross that bowled spin for England before Swann. If Leach is village I fear for the likes of Richard Dawson, Gareth Batty and Chris Schofield.

    • Like 2
  3. 5 minutes ago, Lew-T said:

    Got plenty of tap first innings but I didn’t come on here and gloat... wasn’t great until that one ball that got the wicket this innings...

    Let’s see if he can win us the game tomorrow and not the odd ball he gets right...

    Been impressed with Bess however.

    Yeah getting slapped about by Rishabh Pant proves that’s he’s village.

    Good point.

    • Haha 1
  4. A reminder of just how tough the next few weeks are likely to be and if England get well beaten, which I expect they will, the criticism shouldn’t be go too over the top. 
     

    Playing India (a) at the moment right up there with the toughest tasks in the history of test cricket.

    Also shows just how impressive it was England winning there 2-1 in 2012 under Cook.

    989CD2EE-8DED-45A4-9FB2-6AD8893E2AC4.jpeg

    • Sad 1
  5. 20 hours ago, And Its Smith said:

    Not long now until the 1st Test.  I think the team will be:

    1. Burns

    2. Sibley

    3. Crawley

    4. Root

    5. Stokes

    6. Lawrence (if Pope not fit)  (or Moeen if playing 3 spinners)

    7. Buttler

    8. Bess

    9. Leach

    10. Wood 

    11.  Broad (or Anderson depending on rotation)

     

    Players without brackets more likely to start I reckon.  Outside chance of 3 spinners.  Only when Stokes isn't available does it drum home how important he is for the balance of the side.  Almost like playing with 12 players.  

    Only question mark if 3 spinners play is whether Moeen would come in for Lawrence or Wood.  Cannot see them going into a Test with only Broad and Stokes as the pace options so think it would be Lawrence if the pitch is a big turner.

    Wood isn’t there for the first two tests.

  6. 15 minutes ago, Red Army 75 said:

    Do you think Bairstow could open in the sub continent. IMO it could be an option 

    It’s the conclusion I came to in the week before they announced he wouldn’t be there for the first two tests.

    Not the long term answer there, but certainly the best bet for the India series in my opinion.

    • Like 1
  7. 11 minutes ago, Lew-T said:

    I know they’re Somerset lads but they are village spinners. Not international quality imo

    40 wickets in 11 tests at 29.
     

    299 first class wickets at 26.


    Decent village standard Jack Leach must play.

  8. 14 minutes ago, phantom said:

    Didn't say anything about Hamilton not being a better driver than Bottas, the point is the car is A MASSIVE factor in his records.

    George Russell is obviously a novice driver in Formula 1 racing terms compared to Hamilton. 

    Yes, obviously the car is a massive factor in his success. That is so obvious I can’t believe you think it needs pointing out. Clearly Vettel was helped by a dominant Red Bull, Schumacher was helped by a dominant Ferrari and so on..

    That doesn’t change the fact that he is quite obviously a great. Would he win the championship in a Alfa Romeo? No. Would he beat anyone else out put in an Alfa Romeo with him and get results the Alfa doesn’t deserve? Yes.

    As Carlos Sainz said in the week, 90% of drivers would win the championship in a Mercedes, but 90% of drivers wouldn’t win it if Hamilton was their team mate.

    If you want to talk about novice drivers, how about an actual rookie, not one with two full seasons, who at the age of 22 beat the two time reigning champion in the same car? What was his name again? Oh yeah, Lewis Hamilton.

    • Like 2
  9. 1 hour ago, phantom said:

    No, I don't believe he is

    This is the point.

    Any other car a novice driver debuts in wouldn't probably make final qualifying, not alone the front row

    Sorry you don’t believe Hamilton is superior to Bottas?


    George Russell isn’t a novice driver driver. He is someone that, up until today, had beaten his teammates in qualifying 36 times in a row, a record only beaten by Schumacher and Senna.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...