Jump to content

marcofisher

Members
  • Posts

    3508
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by marcofisher

  1. Think Roberts instead of Mehmeti suggests that we are happy with an away draw.
  2. Sam Bell decent pace but takes too many touches to ever use it.
  3. Knight is quality, weight of the pass to Sykes made it easy to slide across.
  4. This is surely the replacement for Scott then. One in the base of midfield with two number 8s, Knight and TGH, in front. Didn’t see the weekends match as I was at a wedding but getting the impression that Williams isn’t mobile enough to be one of those two dynamic 8s. This should hopefully bridge the gap between midfield and attack and give us runners from midfield.
  5. NP was talking about how much he was loving life at the end of last season… 3 signings and we could be really pushing the next couple of season as well.
  6. Men and Women are only paid equally at the 4 Grand Slams and not always in their respective tours from my understanding. Conversely, men and women both play 3 sets at ATP (men’s) and WTA (women’s) level, but the prize money is not necessarily equal for tournaments on the regular tour, even if they have the same value points wise.
  7. I fully expect the 3 teams we played to be in the top half. Some of our attacking play still needs developing, I agree. I think Conway is a massive miss. Bell and Mehmeti need to step up. I don’t want to see us stacking players again.
  8. I don’t think we will be in a relegation dogfight. We have just lost to an in-form Birmingham side, and that is our only loss so far.
  9. Most can also see though that his best players have been sold in the past 2 seasons now. He has to take credit for producing those players, and we would be an entirely different proposition if we still had those players. Not that we were wrong to sell them, but just to give balance to the “Pearson has had 3 years argument”. Just had a look at the departures this summer and previous 2, it is absolutely massive!
  10. Absolutely, different conversation maybe. My point was more that I prefer the strategy of the club now to the LJ era. Your points are valid too.
  11. The post I quoted was questioning the Lansdown’s decision making. I asked which decisions under the NP era are questionable and you responded the signings. But I misread your post where you stated you didn’t realise it was about it the Lansdowns, so I thought you were still referring to them. Apologies.
  12. I’m not convinced that we won’t!
  13. But you can’t just chuck money in any more because of FFP
  14. I don’t think the Lansdowns are scouting the players though.
  15. What wrong decisions have been made in the NP era? I am curious as I think we are far better run than in the LJ/DH era.
  16. I would much rather us go for a striker and midfielder than thinking we need to bring in someone just to provide competition to Max.
  17. We just need someone to say we need to revert to a 442 and it will be a full house!
  18. True but would you rather the money go on a midfielder and/or striker first?
  19. Why do you need to resort to insulting everyone, I’m guessing you’re on school holidays?
  20. Pay-as-you-play deal has been mentioned already, that’s a thread bingo!
  21. Undermines your point when you can’t even censor your own post correctly.
  22. Someone on Twitter said he should have called his business Henri Lawnsbury
×
×
  • Create New...