Jump to content

BobBobSuperBob

Members
  • Posts

    19209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    191

Posts posted by BobBobSuperBob

  1. Just now, Charlie0016 said:

    21

    Ta

    I Understand that for you the Sags and the feelings towards them and the rivalry with them means little 

    For many of us of middle age , and some younger and older they will always be a subject of real dislike and something to take the p out of at every opportunity

    Some of us remember 82 when they tried to Nick our ground , and their loud arrogance during parts of the 80s and 90s 

    Many remember events before and during those periods and some after but there are many that really despise em with good reason

    Personally if this thread , only reminds our younger fans that they are a laughable stain on Bristol it will have done its job

     

    Plus it’s really enjoyable to take the p out of them 

    ;)

     

    • Like 19
  2. 12 minutes ago, Charlie0016 said:

    struggling to see the point in this thread . Us city fans go on about how there’s only 1 team in Bristol and how the gas mean nothing to us yet we have a page on them over 1140 pages long . Can someone enlighten me ?

    Genuine question , out of interest , what age group are you ?

  3. 1 hour ago, CotswoldRed said:

    That's as maybe. 

    The key point is that 2000 fans have decided it's no longer for them, despite being in the same division with similar results etc. 

    1500 season tickets less this season according to one on Sagshat - that’s has to be a near %25 drop off

    They are fighting fires 

     

  4. 48 minutes ago, exAtyeoMax said:

    Shocking behaviour - if true! :redcard:

     

    35 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

    That's even worse! I assumed it was a board meeting and then a decision- bad enough that in effect only several, was it 6 or 7 out of 72 clubs got a say but worse still.

    Don't even think the board is sufficient, seems very odd- 72 clubs should've been a given, at an EGM.

    Allegedly votes were done by text and e-mails ! 

    • Sad 1
  5. I see the (Very bitter) Sags are claiming that the new consortium who have taken over at Bolton have taken out £40m Of loans to finance the rebirth 

    Anyone read anything similar elsewhere ?

    ( I’d be surprised if they could even secure those size of loans against any assets without personal guarantees )

  6. 3 hours ago, Tinmans Love Child said:

    Because fat people have a choice about being fat, eat more than you burn off then you put on weight, it’s simple science.  

    People can’t choose to be or not to be gay, that’s the difference.

    If you are on about whether a chant against fat people is nice or not then yeh I agree, probs not nice for a fat person getting sung at, but they have a choice.

    And another example of your ignorance and laughable generalisation

    Ill give you just one example - some disabled people are ‘( I’ll use overweight’ rather than your fat ‘label’) because they are immobile 

     

    id suggest a large part, at least ,  of your ‘40 years experience’ has been wasted

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...