Jump to content

Laner

Members
  • Posts

    1474
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Laner

  1. So technically when games were played behind closed doors in the first lockdown our attendance would still have been 10/12k (remaining season ticket sales)? Despite the fact the stadium would have been empty.

    • Like 2
  2. 1 hour ago, phantom said:

    of course being devils advocate these clubs are now finding ways around regulations.

    Are they actually helping their supporters by not having this extra safety measure in place?

    Will be interesting if mass positive results pop up as a result

    But they're not finding loopholes. The government guidelines state "attendance" not "capacity".

  3. 12 minutes ago, alexukhc said:

    It’s not even about politics anymore…

    sorry they take the piss outta us what are we even meant to do..

    Here’s a question, so if fans can’t come in without the vaccine passport, what about players playing without the vaccine passport?

    It's the players place of work, so technically not a 'venue' for them.

  4. 1 hour ago, redsince1994 said:

    The Allergies - Promised Land

    Fantastic funk & hip-hop artists from Bristol, and their albums keep getting better. Combination of sample based production and live instruments & vocalists

    Thanks for the recommendation... a great funky way to carry on the good feeling from last night's game.

     

    • Like 1
  5. 9 hours ago, VT05763 said:

    Have to rotate a bit I feel.

    For the love of god do not change the formation, tactics etc we have seen in the last 2 games.

     

                                      Bentley

                       Vyner       Kalas       Atkinson

           Scott                                                 Pring

                        Williams         Bakinson

                                   Benerous

                           Wells               Semenyo

     

    HNM for Williams after 60 mins.

     

     

    I agree with the sentiment of your post, but unless the players swapped in are an exact like-for-like replacement, then tactics must change. Wells and Semenyo are different players to Martin so tactics must change to make sure we feed them with the balls/passes they prefer.

    • Like 1
  6. 37 minutes ago, Alex_BCFC said:

    Have never once paid for parking and never walked more than 15-20 mins to ground. No idea why people have such a big issue over it - loads of parking knocking around if you are prepared to walk a mile ish to ground.

    I'm fortunate to live about a five minute walk from the ground and know parking isn't great. And hasn't been helped by the council decisions e.g. extending the RPZs.

    But I do wonder sometimes, why people think they can turn up to an event of 20,000(ish) people and park in the roads directly around the stadium at 2:30pm?

    • Like 6
  7. 2 hours ago, Red DNA said:

    Might see a few more local scenes on the show in the next series as the production is being moved to Bristol. 

    Expect lots of traffic jams, bus/cycle lanes and roads closed for pedestrians then.

    • Haha 1
  8. 10 hours ago, Maesknoll Red said:

    This is the worst bit, those of us in South Bristol won’t even be able to drive to work the other side of town or Avonmouth by using Winterstoke Road, Rownhan hill and Portbury/M5.  As well as catching lots of the football traffic.
     

     

    D03D0E0E-AF6B-45C8-8916-868CAA9813F4.jpeg

    As they've found out in Bath, these zones can just create more traffic and pollution in the outlying areas. In your case you could drive down Ashton Drive to get on the ring road spur and them come back in along the Long Ashton bypass. Not ideal and a longer journey.

    Sadly people with no other viable options will have to find these different routes. 

    And that's the key point in Bristol, we've not got any real cost-effective "other viable options".

     

    • Like 1
  9. 5 minutes ago, headhunter said:

    OK, maybe I was being over zealous in saying NOW but do you have confidence in Fleming and Ball to improve our form if, say, Nigel was given until January 1 [opening of transfer window] to regain his strength? Many have said on here about the impact of long Covid - we could be talking about 6 months, not 6 weeks.

    Also, this health issue has been bubbling since his last absence which was reported as contracting Covid for a 2nd time. The diagnosis this time has not been spelled out but suggests the debilitating symptoms of long Covid or issues linked to his bout of rheumatoid arthritis last year - from an article written by Henry Winter 7/11/20:  Pearson takes a mix of steroids, pills and homeopathic medicines to strengthen his immune system, to keep him moving. 

    No.

    The longer the prognosis the more likely it would be to bring in cover. But the tickly question to answer would be 'how long do we wait?'

    Also I wonder who would be available as short term cover. Yes, we can all name names and look-up managers who are out of work... but realistically would they really want to jump onto the sinking ship at this time, even for only a few months?

  10. 1 minute ago, LondonBristolian said:

    I don’t agree with the title of your post. If a company had a senior manager off for an as yet undetermined period of time, someone would most likely cover from within until there was a bit more of a sense of if it was days, weeks or months. If it was days someone would cover informally, if weeks interim cover would be appointed from within. If months someone external might be brought in.

    If Pearson is signed off long term by a doctor or decides he won’t be back for a number of months, I imagine an interim would be appointed.

    Right now I imagine the club are giving it a week or so to work out if this is long term. Pretty much any business would do the same.

    Spot on. Initial cover would be found internally... which is exactly what City have done.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  11. 10 minutes ago, BetterRedThanBlue said:

    So they've got an agreed deal with marvel so no issue with the licensing.

    They aren't actively promoting marvel because they've got a different sponsor on their shirt.

    How is this advertising? If marvel were the official sponsors would they still quash it? What about every other sponsor? They are technically advertising.

    Perhaps it's advertising because it uses a 'product' not just the company logo? Sponsors promote a brand. 

    Just a thought. Still seems really harsh though.

×
×
  • Create New...