Jump to content

BLRed

Members
  • Posts

    1355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BLRed

  1. Perfect world it would be for him to sign a new 3/4 year deal on 10-15k as he’s proven to be a top earner at the club, but with a non-promotion release clause of his current value of £25mill (he will be worth more than that in a years time, especially if he got us promoted) and inserted a 25-30% sell on clause.

    we get him for at least another season unless a club pays well over the odds for him now. He either gets us promoted or we still are covered financially in the likeliness we don’t and he gets his move to the prem. win win

    • Like 1
  2. It won’t be wolves if they can’t even afford €15mill on another player due to FFP. They’ve sold Jiminez for only 5mill and will need to replace him so surely striker is priority.

    Personally, I expect Brighton to come to the table if they sell caicedo to chelsea. Reckon they could drop 30mill to blow others out of the water that are pissing around trying scrape together bare minimum

    • Like 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, JoeAman08 said:

    Probably unpopular opinion here but James has been good in an average side. Think he would be average in a good side. 

    That paragraph right there is a clear sign of squad improvement and progress if that’s the case. Would be happy if he was the worst option we had because he is a very good midfielder.

    • Like 7
  4. Given the value of some of these unproven/untested Man City youngsters are going for, we are well within our right  to demand the fee we are for Scott. If clubs are willing to spend up to 20 mill on a young player with zero experience, then 25mill is light work for a player with a huge amounts of minutes and league experience in the bank along with a greatly higher ceiling compared to the level he is currently at

    • Like 3
  5. 2 minutes ago, Ian M said:

    I suspect we want to do two more signings and are making sure we try and get Knight for as low a fee as possible to protect what budget remains for the last signing (replacement for Kalas)

    What other positions do you think were looking at? The obvious one is CB but the other not so obvious. Any suggested names for said positions as well?

    reckon obrien has become too expensive an option for us judging by NP’s comments on loan fees etc

  6. Due to Twitter dying a death, the first we are actually going to hear about anything now is the official site when something is done. We can’t even read of any rumours as we can’t even refresh our Twitter feeds. Mine is completely blank. Not sure how I’m supposed to keep up to date with regular news of the things I’m interested in. Guess we should all go back to the days of Ceefax

  7. Move on from Kalas for me. Cashin as a LCB to compete with Atkinson and/or Jake o’brien to replace kalas and to compete for RCB would be the ones for me. Either of those would probably be on less wages than even reduced terms they may have offered to kalas.

    cashin has better future re-sale prospects due to age, has Irish links to others we have or are in for (knight) has obviously played with knight and roberts so has an understanding of how they play and is a naturally left sided cb. I would hope we are exploring him as an option along with knight

  8. 6 minutes ago, BCFCGav said:

    I think McCrorie and Tanner will have the RB spot to lose. L1 loan, SPL loan might work well for us here. There's talent there and it keeps him on the books while sparing us a portion of his wages for a year. 

    I think we see tanner starting and vyner as back up rb as we now have dickie for that rcb role. I see McCrorie as more of a midfielder that could pop up with the odd goal like he did for Aberdeen. 
    cm options of James, Naismith, Williams and McCrorie is pretty strong with some others pushing them or covering for injuries. I don’t see king getting much game time this season

×
×
  • Create New...