TheReds

Back in the day it was the complete opposite though. Nearly full ground but literally thousands less being announced, someone was definitely on the fiddle.

I think it's really nice of Bournemouth to keep going along with this story myself - maybe they had a bit of a discount for that. I read from one poster that anyone who thought Scott was injured was living in cloud cuckoo land. Also have to love how people know what Pearson, Lansdown and players actually think from one comment or one tweet, it's quite comical at times.

Bit bizarre.

Maybe

Hang on a minute - that says he's injured. That cannot be right as Pearson has been telling porkies hasn't he.

Sorry, that simply won't wash on here!!

Don't they play away at a few larger grounds too? It's Prem football, probably 50k per week, playing in possibly the best League in the World against some unbelievable teams & players. It is also a massive opportunity to perform in front of millions of football fans and then take another big step in his career. We also have to face facts that nobody else have really came in for him, so he cannot exactly just turn up and start playing for Man City.

Well done Cornick....

Were you expecting Ronaldo then? There were excuses for last season, surely he deserves some sort of chance this season after a full pre-season. I am not saying he is going to be a world beater for us either, but he's managed to play Championship football for Luton for a few seasons consistently.

25 minutes into the season ffs. Got to love the negativity on here sometimes.

The one in the know on here regarding transfers said yesterday he was definitely injured and not a stunt. Scott could still be gone next week, but it also doesn't mean he isn't injured now though, no doubt if he is gone this conspiracy theory will soon be known as fact.

I don't think they really go a lot on checking "rules and regulations" tbf.

How many posts are showing "we can't bare it"? It's been a constant pisstake for those 6 pages, I haven't seen a single post worried about them, it just seems to be the same as last time, they think it's another billionaire coming to take them past us ,and yet we can say with pretty much certainty it isn't.

They also got some issues with that as well.

Are we sure he hasn't been brought in to sort out those cheesy chips, out of date crisps and the fake fanta?

"BRFC is the one club that I most desired to be a part of, due to its great fanbase" I am surprised he never ended that with "we took over 40,000......."

That doesn't mean they would use one though!!

I am not disputing for one moment that money wouldn't or couldn't be available without affecting FFP etc. What worries me is we still have posters/fans who think we should never sell anyone like Webster, Kelly, Brownhill, Reid, Bryan, Semenyo etc etc and we are not ambitious enough as we are a selling club. Where do these people think we would be without selling them. I still hear from some people (not on here) that Lansdown don't spend enough, isn't ambitious enough, what players we should just go out and just buy, what players we should never sell, these same people will still moan that NP over the first couple of years never did enough without even realising the situation he/we were in.

Bring back Ashton and LJ, I mean let's not worry about that balance sheet, what could go wrong.

Not massively different from last year, we were only 16/1 then.

Waelter Mitty in charge, what else can you expect.

So why not buy Mangotsfield?

Pm'd, a mate wants to take his father if you still have them/one available, assuming he would only need one code.

They do like to pump out numbers that are always incorrect, 40,000 at Wembley, the locked out numbers, home support, away support, 12000 regularly etc etc etc.