Jump to content

brad blit

Members
  • Posts

    1396
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by brad blit

  1. People talking about January buys but I’m presuming that FFP rules won’t change in Jan, and it would still be the case that City have limited funds - unless revenue from start of season to Jan (with gate receipts etc) can be used and give us a transfer kitty? Any idea @Davefevs

  2. Let’s go for it……. (If HNM/Atkinson avail)

                             Bentley

    Tanner.   Kalas.     Atkinson     JD

                    James.   Massengo

    COD.                 Scott.                  Pring 

                           Weimann 

    High press, lots of pace/energy up top with overlapping full backs. Martin needs a rest and Wells still dosnt convince me. 

    • Flames 1
  3. Regarding King, in terms of playing style he’s no Williams or Massengo, but he’s quite clever positionally. Watch him carefully and he does win a lot of second/loose balls and does always try to make himself available for simple passes. Plus he has contributed with a few goals/assists early in the season. He’s a good option who came as a free and on low wages, and is probably a good model pro to have around the club, but he won’t stay beyond this year 

    • Flames 1
  4. The poor pass completion was because B’mouth played a very high line and had everyone except Kelly and Cahill in our half, so players rushed passes and lost ball more times than normal. 

    The game was another mini wake up call for anyone thinking we could achieve anything more than mid table this year, but I’m happy with that as always knew it was a year of consolidation. 

    • Like 2
  5. Time to reflect and move on, 1 point closer to 50 and 3 games unbeaten - each run starts from somewhere…..

    Going forward hopefully Nigel has learnt 4 things 

    1) Baker is not a left back, and Vyner could/should be replaced by Simpson/Tanner

    2) We need to play to our strengths and play players in their correct positions, Scott is not a right midfielder 

    3) 442 does not work with the players we have available, and we need to be looking at 433 or 4231 so we can control the game better and not look so vulnerable on the break 

    4) Long throws do not work, and we need to work on short, sharp patterns of play when the ball is wide rather than lumping it into the box first time 

  6. 3 hours ago, GrahamC said:

    This is so simplistic.

    Change anyone who wasn’t great yesterday for someone else who didn’t play & then it will happen.

    This is a bloody hard league, I watched Derby on Friday & they reminded me of us late last season, loads of willing kids but just overpowered. I bet Peterborough are noticing that trying to outscore teams doesn’t work, either.

    Luton will come & battle, they did so last year & yesterday, when they were two down at Blackburn with less than 20 to go & yet still got a point with a 98th minute equaliser.

    I do expect a change or two Wednesday but just thinking a tweak guarantees a win is wishful thinking.

    Not wishful thinking my friend, just trying to be positive and giving my opinion and those tweaks that hopefully will get us that illusive win ? 

    • Robin 1
  7.                    Bentley 

    Vyner.   Kalas.  Atkinson.    JD

                  James.   HNM

    Semenyo.  Weimann.     Pring

                         Wells

    Play this team Wednesday and we’ll finally get that home win. Yesterday was solid and you can understand him keeping same team as they won previously, but the team just needs an injection of pace and some fresh legs. 
     

    Iv seen the comments regarding JD at left back, but why move Pring back when he’s been playing so well further forward? Semenyo in for King seems quite obvious as King was quiet yesterday, and we need to give Wells a chance to shine as he looked really up for it in his brief cameo yesterday.

    Overall it’s been a steady start with more better performances than last year already, and I’m actually looking forward to City games again - that’s a major plus considering everything over past 18months

               

    • Like 3
  8. This team is by no means the finished article, and it will take a win or 2 for last years debacle to go away. But on paper I still feel like this is not a relegation team, and still time for us to do some work in the market as I feel someone (probably Kalas) will be sold so we can sign 2-3 players that Pearson wants. We look more solid generally and it’s just a case of getting right players to suit formation. Keep the faith 

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
  9. No great loss. Busy bee but dosnt contribute much, rather have actual midfielders who can do everything like Matty James. Prob get 1m tops which may help go towards a L1 young nippy striker we need to compete with Martin & Wells 

  10. I don’t think we actually played that well all game, 2 goals from Leeds being poor at the back yes but despite that we didn’t really have many other clear chances and too many poor final balls. At 2-0 up we looked reasonably comfortable but it looked like there was no real game plan and more just trying to keep ball and try control the game, but again it didn’t work! Last week and tonight’s performance/result is exactly why we won’t stay in the playoffs 

×
×
  • Create New...