Barrs Court Red

I'm not reading that without paragraphs.

The 80's? How far do you intend to go back in your efforts to deflect the spotlight from Labour?

I believe we invaded a few countries back when the Royals were in charge, should we bring them into it?

Anyways, this thread isn't about what a wonderful Labour government we had and I'll leave it there.

So your view is that the UK should send task forces everywhere there are conflicts, is it? So Cameron should send forces to Darfur (it's still going on) and the South Sudan? Major should've interfered in East Timor and Rwanda?

You're on your own with that one. There were international peacekeeping forces in the DRC but not including Britain.

Still you can't fault your Daily Mail logic: Labour was wrong to lead us into an illegal war in Iraq but then also wrong not to support an illegal intervention in Syria. And we'd of had as much chance of damping down extremism there as we had in Iraq.

Anyway, back to the OP's topic. I reckon Clegg will founder on a debate entirely based on the EU, but if he goes on the offensive and widens the debate it will be Farrage on the defensive. But I can't see that happening.

What a stupid post. I was adding context to Blairs war mongering, and how he avoided much worse suffering.

As it happens, I do think ouselves and France have a duty to Africa. As shown in Mali recently, the timely intervention of Western forces can contain a situation before the conflict spreads. You could also say the same about Libya.

We'll also never know if intervention would have been illeagal, as the moment we ruled it out it would never have got through the UN. What do we see a few months later? Chemicle weapons used in Hommes.

Really? So you were happy for this country to do exactly what YOU have said was wrong with the Iraq invasion?

Labour asked for evidence,if it was conclusive they would have backed the government.

Would they bollocks!!! Missed opportunity in Syria, as we've since not only seen chemicle weapons used, but the rebellion infiltrated by Jihadists.

The Labour government sat and did nothing while 6 million were slaughtered in Congo. Dafaur? George Clooney did more than our government. I guess Blaire was too busy hugging Gadaffi to care.

On this site or ziderheads, can't remember which, I not only said O'Driscoll would not be a success, but explained my reasons.

On ziderheads at the beginning of August when most were saying we'd either go up automatically or play offs or mid-table at worse, I said O'Driscoll would take us down again.

Hmmm but now you have a cry when people are negative about the present manager, who you like "because they stay late".

Anyways, I also thought SoD would not work out, mainly because he would never get the time to implement the changes needed. That was painfully obvious moreso, when people talked of automatic promotion this season.

lets just hope you're right about this one, and somehow staying in the office late somehow leads to success on the pitch.

I said from day one SOD would be a disaster and so it proved

How convenient you didn't post it on here.

I thought the corner was turning under SOD.

Of course, we'll never now know.

As if nepotism in the boardroom wasn't enough, managers are now appointed on the basis of their friendship with board members. Which seems the whole basis for the sacking.

Nothing like a spanking to ruin your weekend.[/quote

Depends how much it costs.

]

The only hope we have next season is that SL sees his mistake again and ****s this moron off.

Didn't JL say that Cotterill's contract isn't a clear cut 3 & 1/2 years and they have a clue?.

Edited for you. And the answer is no, they don't have a fu king scooby.

Oh well, I have full faith in John Lansdown to draw on his experience and intelligence to re-invigorate the club, relegated or not.....

...we're so fu ked its untrue.

Have you ever tried driving to Portsmouth?

Hardly a local derby!

You've missed his point....

Clegg will be confident. His performance in the pre election tv debates won the Lib Dems a share of power.

At last, some steel. Good buy in my book.

Looks like you should take your own advice too. He does not agree with you, yet you feel the need to write back , yet claim to not care what's on a forum. You care about what he wrote, and disagree. Quite funny really.

Well I guess you could take that view, if you have a low IQ and see everything at its most basic level. Kind of like a young child I guess.

I find the notion that this forum is somehow a single entity an odd one, especially as its full of discord.

just a different point of view. Your all just a bit precious, no offence intended. Just try being fans first!

All? I'm confused. I couldn't generally give a flying one about what's on a forum, yet it genuinely seems to bother you.

My advice is dry your eyes, take a deep breath and don't log in to view something you clearly hate so much.

I believe if you polled most city fans (and remember most don't even use this excuse of a forum) they would rather close down the waste of space that calls itself the supporters trust and close down this laugh a minute forum, than risk losing the Lansdowns. What we need is less fan power not more for godsake. This forum has never agreed on anything. How on earth it could represent the majority of good honest people is beyond me. Just try supporting and cheering on your team and leave it at that ladies!

Not sure massive troll or massive bellend. Could you confirm?

if you remember it got abused so he gave up.

1 person repeatedly posting about the East End.

Could of easily put all those very good forums on mod preview. Problem solved.

But of course, the easy option was taken to disengage.

I tell you what, the ground ownership issue is becoming more worrying as time goes on.

Still at least he has his priorities right...tens of millions in debt, hemorrhaging fans at an alarming right, club falling like a stone BUT people on a forum the club has nothing to do with can come down for chat chat.

Of course there was a facility to ask questions directly on here many moons ago, but even that proved too hard.

He sure does love talking.

"Judge me on Tinnion"

"Ashton Vale will be built"

"The club will live within its means"

That's my top 3.

Don't get me wrong I don't want him to go, but his decisions have been terrible and putting his son in such a position has been a disaster.

I can stomach a revamped AG over AV but the proposal is shit. Full or compromise to keep potential NIMBYs muzzled.

Glos CC is being redeveloped (horribly in my opinion) so it's not strictly true to say nothing ever gets through the nimby's.

A scaled down compromise following the club threatening to leave the city, and a ground that unlike the original plans, will never hold test cricket.

Great

IF we are still chasing the Vale, isn't the Sainsburys news bad fir us too?

I suspect this is why it seems the fight for AV seemed to evaporate.

That sounds the sort of financial jackanory their board comes out with.

Bristol isn't officially best place to live. It was one article taken from one study. The next week Solihull was "best place to live".

Its all bollocks, I look forward to Bristol disappear up its own arse while the rest of us move on with modern life.