aa_bcfc

Although I was at the Luton game and am called Allan I’d like to confirm that I wasn’t the Alan who made the call. ??

Having watched that game tonight can see why Luton got rid. There wide players were fast and effective and their strikers big and strong. As yet I’ve not seen Cornick as any of these things.

We’ll disagree then. That’s fine though.

That might be the theory but in practice Cornick was dreadful and Sykes was less effective than he was earlier in the game. A pointless substitution.

Williams and James both excellent today. Well done to both of them.

Very well said mate.

Blimey four pages on a bloke and City fan most of you don’t like and somehow he’s meant to be the saddo.

Yep I’m/was a doubter. No question about it though, since he’s realised that we didn’t have any wing backs and he went to a back 4 and started playing players in their natural position things have improved immensely. Well done Nige.

Wells was limping when he came over to the fans at the end of the game. Let’s hope he’s not going to miss games. At least now though we have options with Cornick and with AW back.

Very decent 1st half performance. I would expect a bit more from Coventry 2nd half though.

That was my thoughts as well. He replaced Thresher in that position.

No left back?

I was at that game at white hart Lane. Crowe missed a penalty that day at 1 down. Tony Ford who had previously scored about 17 pens on the trot missed and it had to be retaken. Chris stepped up and blasted wide. A bit later Greaves scored a pen to make it 2-0.

I was there. Horrible player was Monroe. As far as I was concerned he had it coming.

Absolutely spot on.

WBA changed their manager and with the same players turned it round. It can be done.

Yep. He said it twice when I was there.

You’re probable correct but a doubt Pearson will go back 4.

What midfield ??

I agree it was far from a shocker. I thought we were a far better team than Stoke. However they found a way to win a game where we should have got a minimum of one point. The goal on ht was the key point. Without that I think we were comfortable winners.

I lurch between Pearson knows what he’s doing and he’s not got a clue on almost an every other game basis. Part of me thinks that another manager would get more out of the players we have, the other part of me thinks he’s doing ok. I feel that I’m fxxxxxd.

He wasn’t the reason we lost. As you said conceded 2 poor goals. I’m more concerned about Pearsons subs. IMHO Scott was dreadful 2nd half. The obvious sub was taking him off moving Weinman forward and bringing on Sykes. Why the hell did he bring on Martin? Absolute waste of time against Stoke CB’s. Unless Conway was injured why take off your top scorer when you need a goal? I reckon the Stoke CB’s may have tired late on allowing Conway more space.

Agreed regarding Stoke. With respect to Boro. I don’t think they’ll be in a relegation battle but I’ve got a feeling that Luton will be having lost Nathan Jones. Based on that today may be a decent result for us.

Agreed regarding Stoke. With respect to Boro. I don’t think they’ll be in a relegation battle but I’ve got a feeling that Luton will be having lost Nathan Jones. Based on that today may be a decent result for us. Agreed regarding Stoke. With respect to Boro. I don’t think they’ll be in a relegation battle but I’ve got a feeling that Luton will be having lost Nathan Jones. Based on that today may be a decent result for us. Agreed regarding Stoke. With respect to Boro. I don’t think they’ll be in a relegation battle but I’ve got a feeling that Luton will be having lost Nathan Jones. Based on that today may be a decent result for us.

My view entirely.