Jump to content

Spike

Members
  • Posts

    4774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Spike

  1. Just now, Ecko said:

    Were too ******* soft. Showing them too much respect. 

    I mean you say that and they've got a player down looking concussed after Pring was strong in the air and we had a crunching tackle/foul within 6 mins of the game starting. We're not soft, we're outclassed, we're playing a solid Premier League team with quality players and we're struggling to hold them off and we're no where near creative enough to show them something they don't see week in week out playing at the top level.

    • Like 9
  2. 7 hours ago, Super said:

    Yet they had the only shot on goal

    and we had none. 

    They set out to stop us and play on the break, they executed their plan well but didn't have the final ball they needed, we set out to play passes until we could find a gap and we did that and missed out chances... simply put we cancelled each other out, either team could have got all 3 points had they been clinical with final ball/finishing.

    I think had Mehmeti scored that header the game would have opened up a lot and we'd probably have seen a few goals but ultimately we cancelled each other out and lacked quality when it mattered most. 

  3. I think it's odd that people say they're poor when they set out very well to neutralise our attack which for the majority they did. We had a few good chances but defensively they didn't look uncomfortable at all and they had a few counters where they looked dangerous. If anything I think we looked good on the ball, good passing and movement and yet they still managed to keep us from scoring. 

  4. 2 hours ago, Rossi the Robin said:

    Small percentages can make the difference- surely playing in a brighter colour is an advantage when trying to pick out a pass etc 

    As soon as I saw we were in black, had a feeling we’d be slightly off it 

    By this logic we should want to play in the yellow kit right? 

    I honestly don't get what all the fuss is about, from what Scotty said the players like playing in black, so what's the problem? 

  5. On 16/12/2023 at 20:44, Bristol Oil Services said:

    Busy? Doing what?

    A lot of families with step-families do a second Christmas on boxing day, then you have all the people who have a good drink on xmas will be hungover and probably don't want to deal with frustrations that City will most likely bring. 
    Boxing day games are great for those who don't have family commitments and I used to love them but I actually prefer being home on boxing day these days.

  6. Not an unfair point as mentioned before but what did Jon say.... "The fans will still be there"... 

    Simple fact is if you're at the ground and cheering on the team you're doing exactly what Jon expects of you and your opinion means nothing to him. My concern is at what point do the fans finally manage to get it through to Jon that we're not happy because right now the fans are still there and it's business as usual for Jon, in his eyes there is no real backlash over the changes because the fans are still doing what he wants. 

    It's a lose lose situation for the fans, we go to the games and we do what Jon wants, we stay home and we contribute to the problem.

    • Like 1
    • Flames 1
  7. 8 hours ago, YorkshireSection said:

    If only his biggest problem was his distribution, league one keeper; perfect for next season!

    Honestly, utter rubbish. He's got a lot of qualities overlooked because of our defensive issues. Nigel had to change the defence to play to some of our defenders strengths and cover their weaknesses, Max does a lot of coming out and collecting to help with that, put Bentley back in and we may stop a few more shots but we'd ship a lot more goals because Max does so much that is overlooked. 
    I'm at that point with Max where I'm quite happy to see him leave, if not just so the fans see how much he does. The lad gets nothing but abuse for his mistakes but when he makes fantastic plays and does sweeper keeper duties he gets no praise for it. Last night there was a situation where he had to come out and defended the ball at his own corner flag, his thinking was quick, precise and prevented them scoring again, he got nothing for it, in fact most fans bitched about him coming out in the first place.
    I think it's just a thing some of our fans do, they rag on players for their performances but overlook the actual issue that makes a player look so bad at times. I personally think max's kicking is an issue but when you consider how much he has to play passes and kick long passes compared to most other keepers I wonder how many would be capable of fulfilling his current role.

  8. I've voted no but I will add, if Pearson was still in place I feel we may have had an outside chance. The change of football, tactics and very strange substitutions have pushed my vote very much deep down into the no. I'd say that of our squad 3-4 players who had found a place in Pearsons team/squad due to his ability to work a tactic that protected them against their weaknesses and play to their strengths are now likely to stagnate in our squad, one of which extended his contract meaning he'll probably be hard to shift. 
    Sacking Pearson was one of the clubs worst decisions since I was a young boy which is saying a lot but ontop of that they now need to double down on Manning  as his style will not work with these players so they need to invest money into changing players, essentially they've shot themselves in the foot as per usual and now we're in for a long rebuild, one that will most likely end with us buying a few, selling a few and then Manning leaving putting us in a state of a full rebuild again as we'll need to build around the manager who replaces Manning. 
    I think it'll be a long while before we see old Brian on twitter again.

    • Like 1
  9. Just now, cidercity1987 said:

    Our good defence has had the good coached out of them

    It's the same defence, it's just the tactics doesn't suit the players any more and where Pearson built tactics to safeguard against our players weaknesses and play to their strengths Manning has come in and said "these are my tactics, learn them". We could have 9 months of practising and preparing and the same thing will happen because we're not getting the best out of our players playing the way Manning wants. If we genuinely want to keep Manning as manager then the board are going to have to open up those purse strings because it's going to be a rebuild, none of this "top 6 squad" rubbish, the only way this squad is top 6 is with a manager who can get them punching above their weight, if only we had one of those....

    • Flames 1
  10. 5 minutes ago, Baldyman said:

    Absolutely. We had a Premier league manager that was producing silk purses out of sows ears and we replaced him with a manager who was a total rookie in League 1 !!! Wtf were the board thinking ? 

    Same thing they've always thought, that they know better than anyone how to run this club. The issue is Nigel came in and proved them wrong so they've removed him because their egos can't take that someone showed them how wrong they were and did it with loads of restrictions in place. I genuinely think Pearson showed our board what a man with a plan can do and they hated that it wasn't their plan and that the fans appreciated him more than they've ever appreciated the board.

    • Like 12
    • Thanks 1
    • Flames 4
  11. 1 minute ago, Fordy62 said:

    There is a benefit to losing. You just think of Crayon Boy and how much of a ***** he must feel. 

    You say that like he's not already got his man to throw under the bus in place. Manning will go out and it'll all be about how we have a top 6 team and Manning didn't get them playing how he should yadda yadda yadda, meanwhile Nige is probably sat at home watching out of curiosity, wondering how he managed to clean up such a mess only for the board to come and **** it all up again.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 2
    • Flames 2
  12. 1 minute ago, INCRED said:

    Marking non existent, strolled into space, no one within 5 yards and slots in 

    I keep saying it and keep getting accused of being unfair on Vyner but, his positioning left him off the pace there again. I just don't think Vyner can keep up with this higher pace style of defending that we're trying to play, his reading of the game isn't good enough. He almost got caught out with a long ball earlier on again for the same reason.

×
×
  • Create New...