Jump to content
IGNORED

Lee Trundle Or Stern John


Whites

Recommended Posts

Counting is not your strong point then Alex, interesting... :clapping:

From a quick count and a few people are a bit dodgy in admitting which they like (Radstock Red):

John has 22.

Trundle has 18.

So closer than I thought but considering John is on loan and Trundle is still contracted at City and such a nice guy (which seems to affect how effective he has been in this league?!), John isn't doing badly at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have seen it's only SJ scoring record at champ ship level that suggests he should be starting.

Trunds all the way.

To true mate and when he does start he don't stay for long, and to cap it all he gets jeered off, not that i agree with that but he is a total let down :disapointed2se:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah yes, but if we used your logic we would have no right back :noexpression:

I like hard working players with technique. Loads of them around if you understand FOOTBALL

Orr got his good sides.

But with the astronomic sums we are paying we can get far more.

Orr deserves 3/10 of his sallary, John hardly 1/10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like hard working players with technique. Loads of them around if you understand FOOTBALL

Orr got his good sides.

But with the astronomic sums we are paying we can get far more.

Orr deserves 3/10 of his sallary, John hardly 1/10.

Yes but we still need a right back. You said that rather than give him a new contract we should use the money to bring in a midfielder...... but WHO would play right back :dunno:

if you understand FOOTBALL then you would know we still need a right back :winner_third_h4h:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but we still need a right back. You said that rather than give him a new contract we should use the money to bring in a midfielder...... but WHO would play right back :dunno:

if you understand FOOTBALL then you would know we still need a right back :winner_third_h4h:

If you have read my posts I have already answered that question ; ) Don't waste money on a right back.

Most teams are playing two forwards, why the luxury of a right/left back??

Our youth teams should only be playing 1, 2 or 3 at the back anf the rest in an attacking position. 1-0 is a lost game. 6-9 is a win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have read my posts I have already answered that question ; ) Don't waste money on a right back.

Most teams are playing two forwards, why the luxury of a right/left back??

Our youth teams should only be playing 1, 2 or 3 at the back anf the rest in an attacking position. 1-0 is a lost game. 6-9 is a win.

hmm...... :noexpression:

don't think we would last very long in this division with only 2 defenders :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have read my posts I have already answered that question ; ) Don't waste money on a right back.

Most teams are playing two forwards, why the luxury of a right/left back??

Our youth teams should only be playing 1, 2 or 3 at the back anf the rest in an attacking position. 1-0 is a lost game. 6-9 is a win.

Why not an attacking academy? No defenders, jush push on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Gary Johnson says all the time - in this division you spend alot of time defending in every match. we need defenders! thats my opinion anyway

Johnson biggest problem is that he is killing talent off. He rather signs a 38 year pld than gives our pedigree a chance.

If youth got anything it's pace.

We are rock solid for goods sake!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...