South Bristol Red Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Heaton, Foster, J.Wilson, Fontaine, Briggs, Adomah, Kilkenny, Elliott, Woolford, Taylor, Baldock. subs - Gerken, Carey, Bryan, Pearson, Anderson, Stead, Davies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Much more balanced looking team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brizzle Jordan Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Actually quite happy with that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Happy with that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newarkred Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 I like the look of that team. Feeling a little more confident now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brizzle Jordan Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Right footed and left footed CB's, 2 out and out wingers, ball player and a ball winner in the middle and a big man and little man upfront. Some good combinations there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 is it 433 or 442? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JammyOne Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 is it 433 or 442? 4-4-1-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 The best he could have picked given what he has available, but it will never prove to be a team consistent enough for us to kick on, we need at least 2 emergency loans IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elhombrecito Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Actually very happy with that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JammyOne Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Right footed and left footed CB's, 2 out and out wingers, ball player and a ball winner in the middle and a big man and little man upfront. Some good combinations there. Exactly what I was thinking. A team line up that I can agree with. Maybe I would have liked to see Anderson start in place of Wooly though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who Are Rovers? Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Why change the keeper? Deano was great tuesday, And surely he should start davies as he looks our only threat at the moment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Exactly what I was thinking. A team line up that I can agree with. Maybe I would have liked to see Anderson start in place of Wooly though. I can see Woolford tucking in if it is a 4 man midfield, leaving the onus on Briggs to get forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brizzle Jordan Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Why change the keeper? Deano was great tuesday, And surely he should start davies as he looks our only threat at the moment? Still not fit enough after his injury i'd imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Why change the keeper? Deano was great tuesday, And surely he should start davies as he looks our only threat at the moment? Because "Sometimes change is good" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Solid looking team. Wouldn't have brought Heaton back instead of Geken, and Davies should always start if 100% imo - perhaps he isn't? Anyway, you're never going to agree with everything, confident that team should give Charlton a good game. Off to the Gate now - COME ON CITY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Solid looking team. Wouldn't have brought Heaton back instead of Geken, and Davies should always start if 100% imo - perhaps he isn't? Anyway, you're never going to agree with everything, confident that team should give Charlton a good game. Off to the Gate now - COME ON CITY! If you are fit enough for the bench, you are fit enough to start IMO, if there is any doubt on fitness, there is no way you should be on the bench, and breaking down when you come on. I am surprised, if fit, he should start. That team is probably the most balanced he has put out for a while. Here is hoping for a good performance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coxy27 Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 If you are fit enough for the bench, you are fit enough to start IMO, if there is any doubt on fitness, there is no way you should be on the bench, and breaking down when you come on. I am surprised, if fit, he should start. That team is probably the most balanced he has put out for a while. Here is hoping for a good performance Another one of those things that is often said in football, when in reality, it makes no sense. He may well be fit enough to start, but would you say that because someone is fit enough to run a half marathon, then they are therefore fit enough to run a full marathon? No. If he's only able to give 100% for say, 30 minutes, then starting the player would make no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 As balanced a side as he could put out. Still looks very weak down the middle to me, but that aint the fault of McInnes to be fair. Elliott or Pearson ? Kilkenny or Morris ? Woolford or Anderson ? Wilson or Carey ? Not a lot in it really. Really?, whose fault is it then GJ, Millen?, he has failed to address a problem that has persisted for 4/5 years, so he has seen it for the past 12 months on a regular basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Another one of those things that is often said in football, when in reality, it makes no sense. He may well be fit enough to start, but would you say that because someone is fit enough to run a half marathon, then they are therefore fit enough to run a full marathon? No. If he's only able to give 100% for say, 30 minutes, then starting the player would make no sense. Makes perfect sense, if he breaks down you can sub him. If you bring him on for someone else, and he breaks down, you are screwed. If he is fit enough he is fit enough, if he isn't he should not be on the bench. simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 If you are fit enough for the bench, you are fit enough to start IMO, if there is any doubt on fitness, there is no way you should be on the bench, and breaking down when you come on. I am surprised, if fit, he should start. That team is probably the most balanced he has put out for a while. Here is hoping for a good performance Don't agree. IMO he maybe good enough for 20 mins at the end, not irritate his injury and ease his way back in to full contention. Personally I think it makes sense to ease a player back in to match fitness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Don't agree. IMO he maybe good enough for 20 mins at the end, not irritate his injury and ease his way back in to full contention. Personally I think it makes sense to ease a player back in to match fitness. see above for answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Another one of those things that is often said in football, when in reality, it makes no sense. He may well be fit enough to start, but would you say that because someone is fit enough to run a half marathon, then they are therefore fit enough to run a full marathon? No. If he's only able to give 100% for say, 30 minutes, then starting the player would make no sense. Correct. People trott this statement out whenever this situation occurs. DM had to ease SD into the team at the start of the season due to his lack of pre-season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coxy27 Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Makes perfect sense, if he breaks down you can sub him. If you bring him on for someone else, and he breaks down, you are screwed. If he is fit enough he is fit enough, if he isn't he should not be on the bench. simple as that. The point is match fitness not whether the injury will reoccur. If there was a danger of that, then I agree he should not be on the bench at all, but in terms of fitness, i.e. the ability to give 100% for 90 minutes, the point does not make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 The point is match fitness not whether the injury will reoccur. If there was a danger of that, then I agree he should not be on the bench at all, but in terms of fitness, i.e. the ability to give 100% for 90 minutes, the point does not make sense. I was not talking about match fitness. When you are coming back from a hamstring injury, you have to be 100% certain it is okay, if it isn't he should not be on the bench. It is even worse from the bench, as you can never get it warmed up sufficiently. Sorry I should have made it clear I was on about his injury, not match fitness per se Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigeon Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Great starting lineup for us today, no excuses I think. Heaton is reliable in goal The back four look balanced We've got the only creative midfielder available playing with Kilkenny, balanced with a box to box midfielder with Elliot Strong wingers with Adomah and hopefully Wooly getting his mojo back Think the combination of Taylors hold up play with Baldocks pace and off the ball movement is our best option up top. Very optimistic for today! 3-1 City COYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipdawg Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Makes perfect sense, if he breaks down you can sub him. If you bring him on for someone else, and he breaks down, you are screwed. If he is fit enough he is fit enough, if he isn't he should not be on the bench. simple as that. Normally I'd agree with you but I think we're that desperate Davies is there to throw on for the last 15 if we're desperate. If he was fit enough for even half a game I think he'd start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JammyOne Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 I don't believe the notion that if you're fit enough for the bench, you're fit enough to start. The whole reason Davies had been on the bench previously is because his fitness wasn't all there, but he was fit enough to come on. Same situation now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welcome To The Jungle Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 First game I'm missing this year as I've spent 90% of my weekend on the bog...dogey spag bol. COYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City_pete1 Posted November 11, 2012 Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 anyone know if their is an online stream??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.