Jump to content
IGNORED

Wallys latest tweet


Red Homer

Recommended Posts

http://gaschat.co.uk/thread/9186/waels-tweet

They seem to think their billionaire owner is cool and are all patting themselves on the back that we had to pay £330 k more than we had to (Having not signed him whilst OOC) :facepalm:

1 Well first of all MT could have demanded a higher signing on fee himself if OOC

2 You've still lost your top goal scorer for peanuts

3 SL didn't actually pay £300k for MT , he used some of his Nectar Points :thumbsup:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Port Said Red said:

Sorry I don't do twitter and at the risk of sounding like an old fogey, what is happening here? Is Wael trying to take the piss because we paid £300k for his only proven goalscorer?

Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BobBobSuperBob said:

http://gaschat.co.uk/thread/9186/waels-tweet

They seem to think their billionaire owner is cool and are all patting themselves on the back that we had to pay £330 k more than we had to (Having not signed him whilst OOC) :facepalm:

1 Well first of all MT could have demanded a higher signing on fee himself if OOC

2 You've still lost your top goal scorer for peanuts

3 SL didn't actually pay £300k for MT , he used some of his Nectar Points :thumbsup:

 

 

Haven't spent a penny since becoming 3rd richest club in the country but it's all well and good because their owner made a joke about selling their star player directly to their rivals for £300k. :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Port Said Red said:

Sorry I don't do twitter and at the risk of sounding like an old fogey, what is happening here? Is Wael trying to take the piss because we paid £300k for his only proven goalscorer?

Yes. That legendary Jordanian sense of humour. :facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

Sorry I don't do twitter and at the risk of sounding like an old fogey, what is happening here? Is Wael trying to take the piss because we paid £300k for his only proven goalscorer?

He is indeed . And looking at the replies he will soon regret it :rofl2br:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Yes.

 

3 minutes ago, Doozerchris said:

He is indeed . And looking at the replies he will soon regret it :rofl2br:

 

4 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

Yes. That legendary Jordanian sense of humour. :facepalm:

Thank you, not as stupid as I look then :) . So we could have had a player who hadn't proved himself above League 2 level for nothing in July, but chose to wait until January to pay £300k, when he had proved himself at League 1 level? Seems like good business to me, especially as we had our loanee teenager banging in more goals than him in the meantime. 
Does that still seem funny to you Mr Wael?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said:

http://gaschat.co.uk/thread/9186/waels-tweet

They seem to think their billionaire owner is cool and are all patting themselves on the back that we had to pay £330 k more than we had to (Having not signed him whilst OOC) :facepalm:

1 Well first of all MT could have demanded a higher signing on fee himself if OOC

2 You've still lost your top goal scorer for peanuts

3 SL didn't actually pay £300k for MT , he used some of his Nectar Points :thumbsup:

 

We have saved 7 months wages so 30 weeks at say £10k per week is...hmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tinpot tweet from the tinpot owner of a tinpot club. Unbelievably unprofessional. And a desperate attempt to find an angle that somehow makes losing your best player for £300k a great deal for the club.

They may wish to consider the fact that £300k is nothing for a Championship club with a billionaire owner, and paying this modest fee has given us time to see him continue to score goals at a higher level than last season, thus making him more valuable anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said:

http://gaschat.co.uk/thread/9186/waels-tweet

They seem to think their billionaire owner is cool and are all patting themselves on the back that we had to pay £330 k more than we had to (Having not signed him whilst OOC) :facepalm:

1 Well first of all MT could have demanded a higher signing on fee himself if OOC

2 You've still lost your top goal scorer for peanuts

3 SL didn't actually pay £300k for MT , he used some of his Nectar Points :thumbsup:

 

Remarkable how none of them came up with this justification until now isn't it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...