Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

A couple of thoughts - why are the seats half depth at the left hand end in the drawing?

If it is a 'proper stand' why does it have pillars?

1. They ran out of Lego bricks and those are damned expensive so they've asked the Council to pay for them.

2. It's a 1950s tribute stand so as to be in keeping with everything else about the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naughty, but nice…

Subject: Objection to Memorial Stadium Planning Application (Reference Number: [Application Reference Number])

Dear [Planning Authority],

I am writing to formally object to the planning application for the proposed changes to the Memorial Stadium, as detailed in the application reference number [Application Reference Number]. I am deeply concerned about the potential impact of these developments on the surrounding area and community. I urge you to consider the following objections:

1. Loss of green space and character: The Memorial Stadium currently serves as an important green space within our community. The proposed changes would result in the loss of this valuable area, which contributes to the character and visual appeal of our neighborhood. Preserving green spaces is crucial for maintaining the quality of life and environmental well-being of our community.

2. Increased noise pollution: The proposed development could significantly increase noise levels, particularly during events or matches held at the stadium. This would have a detrimental effect on the quality of life for nearby residents, disrupting their peace and tranquility. Noise mitigation measures must be put in place to protect the surrounding community from excessive noise disturbances.

3. Traffic congestion and parking issues: The Memorial Stadium is already located in an area with limited infrastructure for handling increased traffic. The proposed changes would likely exacerbate traffic congestion during events, leading to a strain on local roads and causing inconvenience to residents and businesses. Inadequate provisions for parking and traffic management have been presented in the application, raising concerns about the impact on the surrounding area's accessibility and road safety.

4. Strain on local amenities and services: The proposed developments may put a strain on local amenities such as schools, healthcare facilities, and public transportation. The increased population density and demand for services resulting from the changes to the Memorial Stadium could overwhelm the existing infrastructure, leading to inadequate access to essential facilities for both residents and visitors.

5. Insufficient consideration of environmental impact: The planning application does not adequately address the potential environmental impact of the proposed developments. The loss of green space, potential disruption to local wildlife habitats, and increased pollution from additional traffic should be thoroughly assessed and mitigated before proceeding with any changes to the Memorial Stadium.

In light of the above concerns, I strongly urge the planning authority to carefully reconsider the proposed developments and take into account the potential negative consequences on our community. I believe that alternative plans that better address the concerns raised by residents should be explored.

I kindly request that my objections, along with any supporting documents or evidence provided, be taken into serious consideration during the review and decision-making process. I also encourage an open and transparent dialogue with the community to ensure that the long-term interests of all stakeholders are considered.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will carefully consider the objections raised and make a well-informed decision that preserves the best interests of the community.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RedRock said:

Erm…. not quite right, as much as I would love it to be in this case.

The onus is on the owner/tree surgeon to satisfy themselves that there are no nesting birds or the presence of a bat roost before commencement of tree (or hedge) operations. As you can imagine, this legal ‘obligation’ is easy to flout by disreputable owners/tree surgeons who will claim they did check and found no evidence.

Of course, if there is evidence presented by others that birds were nesting at the time of the works or a bat roost existed, the key test would be the quality/robustness of that evidence in a court of law. The bar would be set high, not just ‘say so’.

With major developments, or in instances where there are likely to be nesting birds it is regarded as good practice not to undertake works between Feb-Sept/Oct. If, for whatever reason, that is unavoidable many reputable owners/tree surgeons will employ specialist ecologists to undertake surveys to provide evidence prior to works.

Yours 
Monty Don

 

I’ve been roosting my Bats (?) in those trees for years.

Where were the they again? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Some of the supporting comments are so obviously biased and loaded. Imagine thinking that people would complain about having their view of the Gas obscured.

 

Screenshot_20230701-071938.png

The stadium was there before the houses

…but the houses were there long before Rovers came back to steal the ground.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
56 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said:

Sorry if this is formatted the wrong way, but this objection is proper #GasLogic and Gift Giving, all rolled in to one.

 

Screenshot_20230701_085912_Drive.jpg

There are a few like that 

I guess it was a trick question 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve only had a quick glance at the BCC site and, what I assume to be, the relevant application.

Struth, with the (big) caveat that if what I have seen is the ‘full’ submission and if I was engaged to oppose that development the application could be literally torn apart even before considering the merits or otherwise of the proposal.

I can see the Planning Department asking for loads more information before they can even start considering it. They may also be asking for ‘clarification’ of certain responses on the form, assuming the objectors claims about the presence of trees on site is correct.

‘Back of fag packet, but it didn’t even manage that’ quote springs to mind from an old Inquiry. 
 

Of course, the Sags will claim the delays are all BCCs fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, petehinton said:

oh no it’s happening again….

It's ok he says he doesn't always agree with Tucker Carlson a man sacked for lying and who's defence for faking news on a news channel was that he isn't really a news person.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, petehinton said:

oh no it’s happening again….

Sad really.

Barton is an idiot who is really desperate to pretend he’s smart.

Robert Kennedy jr has some seriously out there conspiracy theory views, COVID was a hoax for one, all a Government experiment, best stick to colouring in, Joey.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To confirm how old George Friend is, we were linked with him when Gary Johnson was in charge - he responded “I haven’t phoned a friend” when asked about the link. They are genuinely looking at players we may have considered 15 years ago. That’s how tinpot they are.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

To confirm how old George Friend is, we were linked with him when Gary Johnson was in charge - he responded “I haven’t phoned a friend” when asked about the link. They are genuinely looking at players we may have considered 15 years ago. That’s how tinpot they are.

Just like James Wilson he looks like another player who wants to get back a bit closer to home (Barnstaple boy) at the end of his career and the s*gs are paying for it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Just like James Wilson he looks like another player who wants to get back a bit closer to home (Barnstaple boy) at the end of his career and the s*gs are paying for it.

Fair play to him he’s had a decent career, can’t think of any other players who have made it coming from north Devon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Glen hump said:

Fair play to him he’s had a decent career, can’t think of any other players who have made it coming from north Devon.

There must be a few but I can`t think of too many off the top of my head - Andy King was born there of course.

Fun fact: Gaye Advert of the eponymous punk band is from Bideford.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

There must be a few but I can`t think of too many off the top of my head - Andy King was born there of course.

Fun fact: Gaye Advert of the eponymous punk band is from Bideford.

Pretty sure king never actually lived there 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

No, I think his folks were on holiday at the time. The family are from Maidenhead which makes it all the more strange that he supports us!

If you saw the interview when he signed his late grandfather was from Sodbury & was a ST holder, think he took him to games when he was younger.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anus Breath using a preseason win over Melksham as evidence that they are making progress (drew with them a couple of summers ago). ?

Did you notice the attendance? 2014 - that was a good year for the Rent Boys. ;)

Must have been nice for their syphilis-riddled fans to see a decent ground for once.

  • Haha 2
  • Hmmm 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, phantom said:

Screenshot_20230701_095349_Drive.jpg

Screenshot_20230701_095359_Drive.jpg

Screenshot_20230701_095406_Drive.jpg

Screenshot_20230701_095414_Drive.jpg

The very definition of tinpot. Already building it without any proper consultation with the local residents and without any planning permission. It shows a TOTAL disregard for anything and anyone else that presumes to get in their way. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WessexPest said:

Anus Breath using a preseason win over Melksham as evidence that they are making progress (drew with them a couple of summers ago). ?

Did you notice the attendance? 2014 - that was a good year for the Rent Boys. ;)

Must have been nice for their syphilis-riddled fans to see a decent ground for once.

Attendance was as you say 2014 , so Barton tweets thanks to our fantastic supporters 2000 + here tonight ! So where did Melksham ‘s 12 supporters sit ? 

Such  a dick ?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TomF said:

I’m waiting for them to be outraged at city fans making comments on the application.

We remember your objections about Ashton Vale

We remember you being the only club in south west who didn’t support the World Cup bid

We remember you laughing at the village green

We remember your objections to Ashton Gate redevelopment. 
 

SUCK IT UP. 

Tbh i had hoped we would have flooded the portal with objections!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

That concourse is going to be spectacular - provided you’re four feet tall. 

Surely that is the old "no row M" bus shelter being torn down?

If it is that is the new stand it is utterly laughable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, cityal said:

Surely that is the old "no row M" bus shelter being torn down?

If it is that is the new stand it is utterly laughable

It's not the new stand.

That's the one they build a couple of Seasons ago that didn't have a row M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Silvio Dante said:

To confirm how old George Friend is, we were linked with him when Gary Johnson was in charge - he responded “I haven’t phoned a friend” when asked about the link. They are genuinely looking at players we may have considered 15 years ago. That’s how tinpot they are.

They still shopping at Tilson's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

It's not the new stand.

That's the one they build a couple of Seasons ago that didn't have a row M.

Back then those a55holes sold tickets for the mirage that is Row M. Now they're selling tickets for an imaginary new stand and the fucktards are once again falling for it. Pure Comedy Gold.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Swede said:

The very definition of tinpot. Already building it without any proper consultation with the local residents and without any planning permission. It shows a TOTAL disregard for anything and anyone else that presumes to get in their way. 

That could / should come back to bite them in the arse, extremely arrogant.

Edited by Ska Junkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Any Bemny/Southville blokes of a similar age may remember the Glaswegian barmaid in the Hen and Chicken, I would say around 85-87- her name may have been Ang, but I wouldn’t bet my house on it.

Her favourite phrase was “Why don’t you f**k off and die” whenever I think of the Gas she comes back to me and I think how appropriate her phrase is to my feelings for the gas.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Ska Junkie said:

That could / should come back to bite them in the arse, extremely arrogant.

It won't , I'm sure our wonderful Mayor will see it's all ok. 

I would guess that any normal person seeking Planning Permission would have to wait around 6 weeks , that would take them up to about the 10th of August and the first game is the 5th. The website says within 8 weeks.
They have to get plans passed and the stand built and tested in under 5 weeks.

I'm no expert, but that seems really tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 1960maaan said:

It won't , I'm sure our wonderful Mayor will see it's all ok. 

I would guess that any normal person seeking Planning Permission would have to wait around 6 weeks , that would take them up to about the 10th of August and the first game is the 5th. The website says within 8 weeks.
They have to get plans passed and the stand built and tested in under 5 weeks.

I'm no expert, but that seems really tight.

You remember all those occasions where Wally has said `These things take time`? Well, all the time he`s saved up is now being put to good use.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a pair of Great tits nesting, but they've now had to move on. Every morning I'd admire the pair of Great tits in my garden, and being on my own it was nice to have nature to appreciate. I
had hoped that more tits would be on view, but that's unlikely with the bushes gone. Do we really want to be a city that values temporary structures over nature? It's too late for my tits.
but we should set a precedent of say 'no" to this happening in future.

 

 

 

Never mind pal, come every other Saturday there will be at least 11 tits on display. 

Edited by stortfordred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, 1960maaan said:

It won't , I'm sure our wonderful Mayor will see it's all ok. 

I would guess that any normal person seeking Planning Permission would have to wait around 6 weeks , that would take them up to about the 10th of August and the first game is the 5th. The website says within 8 weeks.
They have to get plans passed and the stand built and tested in under 5 weeks.

I'm no expert, but that seems really tight.

The mayor has no power over planning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monkeh said:

The mayor has no power over planning

?he absolutely does.  2 examples-
1) Millions wasted on the arena site, moved for his YTL chums to the benefit and strangely, South Glos.

2) Bris Meadows. Persuaded a government department to spend millions of tax payers cash on the site, only to u-turn when it was more politically expedient.

What I think you mean, is he doesn’t in theory have control over the planning committee. Which is true, but to claim the Labour Lead wouldn’t have influence over Labour councillors is a stretch.

 

Ive hinted at this before, but if someone was that invested, they’d do an FOI request for details of interaction between the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor and representatives of Bristol Rovers.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...