Jump to content
IGNORED

Most of you wanted it....


Bar BS3

Recommended Posts

Updated to date, after I posted it on a match thread a couple of games ago.....

 

Dean Holden (Numpty who should never have been appointed)

P36, W16, L17 PPG 1.42.

Nigel Pearson (the experienced manager that everyone wanted)
P32, W7, L18, PPG 0.875

  • Like 8
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn’t want Pearson from the start but this isn’t time for “i told you so”. Point scoring etc and who to blame is pointless. Don’t want to sound like a cheerleader but we are bang in trouble and i think the fans could be huge to keeping us up. A few weeks away for internationals feels like it’s come at the perfect time. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wiltshire robin said:

Makes little difference who the manager is when the board are absolutely clueless.

Bollocks..! 

He's the man who sends us out with no shape, no game plan & doesn't have a clue about our best starting 11, after 9 months! 

  • Like 12
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GTFABM said:

I didn’t want Pearson from the start but this isn’t time for “i told you so”. Point scoring etc and who to blame is pointless. Don’t want to sound like a cheerleader but we are bang in trouble and i think the fans could be huge to keeping us up. A few weeks away for internationals feels like it’s come at the perfect time. 

Who's point scoring....? 

I've just presented some cold hard facts. 

You make your own conclusions from them. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

Updated to date, after I posted it on a match thread a couple of games ago.....

 

Dean Holden (Numpty who should never have been appointed)

P36, W16, L17 PPG 1.42.

Nigel Pearson (the experienced manager that everyone wanted)
P32, W7, L18, PPG 0.875

Holden wasn’t the answer. I wouldn’t swap Pearson for Holden. That’s a weird comparison.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bar BS3 said:

Bollocks..! 

He's the man who sends us out with no shape, no game plan & doesn't have a clue about our best starting 11, after 9 months! 

:laugh: yes Pearson is underachieving and I’ve backed him from the start but now think we need a change. The main cause of the problems at this club is the lansdowns being totally out of there depth running a football club . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wiltshire robin said:

Makes little difference who the manager is when the board are absolutely clueless.

Rubbish nobody wanted Holden because everyone thought he was part of the problem- everyone wanted Pearson because he was a name and I think up until today everyone was still clinging to the hope he would recreate his past glories.

The numbers speak for themselves he is dreadful up against holdens stats.

If we lose at home to Blackburn next up he has to go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MC RISK77 said:

Rubbish nobody wanted Holden because everyone thought he was part of the problem- everyone wanted Pearson because he was a name and I think up until today everyone was still clinging to the hope he would recreate his past glories.

The numbers speak for themselves he is dreadful up against holdens stats.

If we lose at home to Blackburn next up he has to go

Agreed but lansdowns been in charge for 20+ years now and spent more than most but we are still heading back to league one .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wiltshire robin said:

:laugh: yes Pearson is underachieving and I’ve backed him from the start but now think we need a change. The main cause of the problems at this club is the lansdowns being totally out of there depth running a football club . 

I disagree, but respect your opinion. 

Without the Lansdowns, we'd be.... No better than Rovers...!

They've built the club amazingly. But we need someone to take control of the footballing decisions & appointments. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wiltshire robin said:

Your right but all this started with king Steve being totally oblivious to what is going on at the club and letting his mates just get on with it 

Ashton appointed Pearson for example, is that what you mean ?

Just now, Bar BS3 said:

I disagree, but respect your opinion. 

Without the Lansdowns, we'd be.... No better than Rovers...!

They've built the club amazingly. But we need someone to take control of the footballing decisions & appointments. 

Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

Updated to date, after I posted it on a match thread a couple of games ago.....

 

Dean Holden (Numpty who should never have been appointed)

P36, W16, L17 PPG 1.42.

Nigel Pearson (the experienced manager that everyone wanted)
P32, W7, L18, PPG 0.875

Just out of interest, do you know what Johnson’s was? COYR 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

Who's point scoring....? 

I've just presented some cold hard facts. 

You make your own conclusions from them. 

How does it look after both were in charge after pre season etc? 

I ignore Pearson’s record completely from last season cause in my opinion he was shafted with the injuries & contract situation of many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wiltshire robin said:

:laugh: yes Pearson is underachieving and I’ve backed him from the start but now think we need a change. The main cause of the problems at this club is the lansdowns being totally out of there depth running a football club . 

SL is not picking the team or tactics, he has employed an experience manager to do that

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carey 6 said:

How does it look after both were in charge after pre season etc? 

I ignore Pearson’s record completely from last season cause in my opinion he was shafted with the injuries & contract situation of many.

Well you just need to look at the league table, surely..?! 

Just now, Sturny said:

I don’t know why but I read the starting post as a jab at people who wanted him? It made logical sense for us to go for NP, he’s just fudged it 

Just a factual comparison between our last 2 managers. 

Sorry if the facts feel like a dig..! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

SL is not picking the team or tactics, he has employed an experience manager to do that

I agree that it’s probably time for Pearson to go (I’m somebody who really wanted him and backed until today) . It’s the decisions the board have made over the last few years that have us in this mess .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

Updated to date, after I posted it on a match thread a couple of games ago.....

 

Dean Holden (Numpty who should never have been appointed)

P36, W16, L17 PPG 1.42.

Nigel Pearson (the experienced manager that everyone wanted)
P32, W7, L18, PPG 0.875

You can’t blame anyone for wanting Pearson though can you, on paper it is/was the perfect appointment. Isn’t working out for whatever reason but i still stand by wanting him at the time.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...