Jump to content
IGNORED

Not going Saturday


CyderInACan

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, VT05763 said:

It is not the deaths !!!!

The hospitals will be full and overflowing with COVID patients, most will recover but they will clog up the system for as you say  -

cancer, pneumonia, heart attacks, kidney failure, brain tumours, car accidents, site accidents, shark attacks…

Truly astounding the amount of people who do not understand this.

Also, today it's been announced a third of London's fire engines were out of action this week due to Covid

If you continue to let this run wild, there are massive knock on effects.

Its ok to say "just live with it" but that greatly ignores the fact that letting 100k poeple a day catch covid is potentially millions of people off sick at any one time

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said:

And there we have it.

He is now both Kylie AND Robbie.

Does this mean you'll need to show vaccination status for both?

I’d likely lose the testing stick up Kylie’s wotsit, and Robbie would likely sniff it so far up his nose we won’t see the result until he excretes it in a couple of days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harry said:

I’ve reluctantly decided that I will be attending. 
I was keen to stay at home due to my moral standpoint on covid passes, but my daughter has been desperate to come to this game and she has made me cave in. 
Everything I do, I do for my kids, so now that she wants to go, I’ve had to reluctantly agree. 
Ah well, so much for my one-man protest ? Best get that NHS app open. 

What a waste of time all that harping about morals and anti vaccine passport then ?

As with most things, people have morals until it's down to them to make a difficult decision

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bcfc01 said:

I would think it would be at least 14k to cover the ST sold and any POTD sold.

How many will actually be there is another matter..

I haven’t looked it up lately but there was time when we’d get the attendance, which included every season ticket wether they were there or not. Then later on you could find out exactly how many were in the ground.

one match in particular, may have been Sheffield Wednesday, the snow in the south west was so bad myself and thousands of others couldn’t get there. The difference in the 2 attendances given was over 5k if I remember correctly.

If many more pull out I’ll be able to do a count during the game and let you know.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, VT05763 said:

It is not the deaths !!!!

The hospitals will be full and overflowing with COVID patients, most will recover but they will clog up the system for as you say  -

cancer, pneumonia, heart attacks, kidney failure, brain tumours, car accidents, site accidents, shark attacks…

Truly astounding the amount of people who do not understand this.

 

Edited by AppyDAZE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ralphindevon said:

I haven’t looked it up lately but there was time when we’d get the attendance, which included every season ticket wether they were there or not. Then later on you could find out exactly how many were in the ground.

one match in particular, may have been Sheffield Wednesday, the snow in the south west was so bad myself and thousands of others couldn’t get there. The difference in the 2 attendances given was over 5k if I remember correctly.

If many more pull out I’ll be able to do a count during the game and let you know.

Spoke to Jerry (SLO) earlier and he wonders how many will actually turn up tomorrow - we were taking about fans not the players btw ?

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harry said:

I’d likely lose the testing stick up Kylie’s wotsit, and Robbie would likely sniff it so far up his nose we won’t see the result until he excretes it in a couple of days. 

I'll go and get it back for you, if you want..?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Harry said:

I expected EXACTLY that response from certain posters. Which is exactly why I posted this. 
I could easily have just attended the game and not announced it to all of you wonderful folks on here, but I thought I’d announce it as I knew you’d all find it intriguing and react exactly as was anticipated. 
Thanks for being predictable. 

Enjoy the match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davefevs said:

Spoke to Jerry (SLO) earlier and he wonders how many will actually turn up tomorrow - we were taking about fans not the players btw ?

It’ll be annoying if less than 10,000 are there and we’ve all had to queue up to show our vaccine passport. 
I can’t see there being many more than that. Years ago this was always called black Saturday for football clubs, this is a shade or two darker than black

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MarcusX said:

What a waste of time all that harping about morals and anti vaccine passport then ?

As with most things, people have morals until it's down to them to make a difficult decision

Don’t join the nasty gang Mark. ?

There are some rather putrid posters on here, you’ve certainly not been one of them before. Don’t be swayed into their cult. ?

2 minutes ago, Colombo Robin said:

Enjoy the match

Oh, I highly doubt that. Have you seen us lately ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ralphindevon said:

It’ll be annoying if less than 10,000 are there and we’ve all had to queue up to show our vaccine passport. 
I can’t see there being many more than that. Years ago this was always called black Saturday for football clubs, this is a shade or two darker than black

Attendance will be less than 10,000 but the club won't be able to change the rules as we've got more than 10,000 season tickets.  Only exception to this could be the FA Cup game v Fulham...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Bard said:

Attendance will be less than 10,000 but the club won't be able to change the rules as we've got more than 10,000 season tickets.  Only exception to this could be the FA Cup game v Fulham...

Sign me up. 
Hang on. £23 bloody quid!! 
?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Bard said:

Attendance will be less than 10,000 but the club won't be able to change the rules as we've got more than 10,000 season tickets.  Only exception to this could be the FA Cup game v Fulham...

Oh right, ta. Yes I was wondering about the Fulham game. But I can’t see them changing it just for that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harry said:

I’ve reluctantly decided that I will be attending. 
I was keen to stay at home due to my moral standpoint on covid passes, but my daughter has been desperate to come to this game and she has made me cave in. 
Everything I do, I do for my kids, so now that she wants to go, I’ve had to reluctantly agree. 
Ah well, so much for my one-man protest ? Best get that NHS app open. 

 

She didn't fancy the vegan pasties at the New Lawn then, H?

Welcome back. ;)  

I'll be there. Omicron seems at its highest in London and Scotland. Mainly Delta still in the West Country, and I've been facing that down for the entirety of this season to date, including when Bristol had a higher infection rate than it does now.

Judging by the likely crowd, it doesn't sound like social distancing is going to be a problem.  :whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Harry said:

Don’t join the nasty gang Mark. ?

There are some rather putrid posters on here, you’ve certainly not been one of them before. Don’t be swayed into their cult. ?

Oh, I highly doubt that. Have you seen us lately ?

I've stayed out of most of it, agreed with some of your points tbh. I even disagree with the vacinne passports as I dont think they do enough to reduce the spread anyway. Just thought the u-turn was amusing ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

She didn't fancy the vegan pasties at the New Lawn then, H?

Welcome back. ;)  

I'll be there. Omicron seems at its highest in London and Scotland. Mainly Delta still in the West Country, and I've been facing that down for the entirety of this season to date, including when Bristol had a higher infection rate than it does now.

Judging by the likely crowd, it doesn't sound like social distancing is going to be a problem.  :whistle:

Strangely enough Robbo, Forest Green have adopted a very unusual strategy. 
The capacity is less than 10k so they don’t need to enforce the pass. 
However, they have decided they fall foul of the 500 indoor setting. 
Their main stand is linked to their pub and hospitality suite and so they’ve decided that technically they are hosting over 500 persons in an indoor setting. 
So, if you’ve got a ticket for the main stand, you have to show your pass. But if you have a ticket for the terrace you don’t need it. 
 

Not like our man Mr Vince to come up with some bollox now is it ?

 

ps - I got that from the handy link to their forum which you provided the other day ?

Edited by Harry
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harry said:

Strangely enough Robbo, Forest Green have adopted a very unusual strategy. 
The capacity is less than 10k so they don’t need to enforce the pass. 
However, they have decided they fall foul of the 500 indoor setting. 
Their main stand is linked to their pub and hospitality suite and so they’ve decided that technically they are hosting over 500 persons in an indoor setting. 
So, if you’ve got a ticket for the main stand, you have to show your pass. But if you have a ticket for the terrace you don’t need it. 
 

Not like our man Mr Vince to come up with some bollox now is it ?

 

Yate Town?  Roman Glass St George?  BMF?

A whole world of non-league could await your kids. With a chance for a pint on the terraces for you and new and colourful swear words to be picked up from the pitch for them. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ChippenhamRed said:

Exactly this.

Even if it was “just the flu” (it isn’t), if flu cases were at 90k and doubling every two days, we would STILL have a massive problem coming our way with both NHS bed capacity AND staffing levels. Likewise other key workers.

Ignoring Covid does absolutely nothing to help cancer or any other illnesses - as Whitty made abundantly clear yesterday.

 

Tell me if I've misunderstood this...but this is bollox. We built at the beginning of covid temporary covid hospitals throughout the country.

They all got dismantled and never used, as we were told there wasn't enough drs and nurses ' specialised' to deal with covid.

During the height of covid this year, my father was in Southmead with Brain cancer. The hospital and wards were empty when I visited. Empty... literally.

So it's not beds that are a problem...it's staff. 

Surely we should be building more hospitals and educating staff, and paying them a decent wage. That should be the foremost action, especially as it's been two bloody years now and not expected to stop.

Two friggin years...that we've just accepted to live with and not change.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

Yate Town?  Roman Glass St George?  BMF?

A whole world of non-league could await your kids. With a chance for a pint on the terraces for you and new and colourful swear words to be picked up from the pitch for them. 

To be fair, she doesn’t really like football. Just enjoys a day out, plenty of sweets and the chance to put her iPad on after 20 minutes and play some games. 
I don’t think Lodge Road or Cossham Street would be her bag. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spudski said:

Surely we should be building more hospitals and educating staff, and paying them a decent wage. That should be the foremost action, especially as it's been two bloody years now and not expected to stop.

That is logical Spud.

Why isn’t it happening?  We know the answer don’t we!

Same with many other services too.

Let’s make it look shit so that when we put a spin on selling it off, the public aren’t aghast at the proposals, and will believe arguments like “they” just waste lots of money too, it’s better in private hands.  There are probably parts of the NHS that could be more efficiently run privately, but the main healthcare part is just a ruse for an insurance backed health service with the likes of Aaron manually manipulates (no I spelt it right) providing the insurance “vehicle”.  

 

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lew-T said:

It’s a valid point which I understand (makes a change from memes eh!).

But there are talks on here, out there etc of shutting things down again. How far do you go with it? Are we going to have the same discussions every winter?

 

It will go on until the UK and other countries of similar wealth and privilege accept the fact that the whole world has to be vaccinated for "herd immunity" to have any chance of success.

Our current "master plan" of raising the draw bridge and sodding the rest, will lead to a possible never ending supply of different variants from around the world.

and yes lockdowns and restrictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Davefevs said:

That is logical Spud.

Why isn’t it happening?  We know the answer don’t we!

Same with many other services too.

Let’s make it look shit so that when we put a spin on selling it off, the public aren’t aghast at the proposals, and will believe arguments like “they” just waste lots of money too, it’s better in private hands.  There are probably parts of the NHS that could be more efficiently run privately, but the main healthcare part is just a ruse for an insurance backed health service with the likes of Aaron manually manipulates (no I spelt it right) providing the insurance “vehicle”.  

 

There is definitely talk that maybe the reason. 

There are too many hypocritical things in place that give me reason to think this is not about our health perse anymore. Too much of it doesn't make any sense.

The fact we are two years down the line, with no change, same old excuses...and yet people fall for this shit every day. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

We know the answer don’t we!

Same with many other services too.

Let’s make it look shit so that when we put a spin on selling it off, the public aren’t aghast at the proposals, and will believe arguments like “they” just waste lots of money too, it’s better in private hands.  There are probably parts of the NHS that could be more efficiently run privately, but the main healthcare part is just a ruse for an insurance backed health service with the likes of Aaron manually manipulates (no I spelt it right) providing the insurance “vehicle”.  

 

Sadly you're spot on Dave.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, spudski said:

Tell me if I've misunderstood this...but this is bollox. We built at the beginning of covid temporary covid hospitals throughout the country.

They all got dismantled and never used, as we were told there wasn't enough drs and nurses ' specialised' to deal with covid.

During the height of covid this year, my father was in Southmead with Brain cancer. The hospital and wards were empty when I visited. Empty... literally.

So it's not beds that are a problem...it's staff. 

Surely we should be building more hospitals and educating staff, and paying them a decent wage. That should be the foremost action, especially as it's been two bloody years now and not expected to stop.

Two friggin years...that we've just accepted to live with and not change.

Sadly those Nighting Gale hospitals were just for show and positive publicity. Even this disaster of a Government would have been well aware there were no staff to run them.

COVID patients need intensive care beds (on the whole) with specialist nursing care and ventilators.

General wards may well not seem full in this scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

That is logical Spud.

Why isn’t it happening?  We know the answer don’t we!

Same with many other services too.

Let’s make it look shit so that when we put a spin on selling it off, the public aren’t aghast at the proposals, and will believe arguments like “they” just waste lots of money too, it’s better in private hands.  There are probably parts of the NHS that could be more efficiently run privately, but the main healthcare part is just a ruse for an insurance backed health service with the likes of Aaron manually manipulates (no I spelt it right) providing the insurance “vehicle”.  

 

The railways were privatised with the promise of cheaper fares, improved punctuality and constantly upgraded rolling stock.

In the last 10 years rail fares have gone up 46%, punctuality and reliability have got worse and some of the trains are 40 years old.

Never hand essential public services over to Spivs who are beholden to share holders

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, VT05763 said:

Sadly those Nighting Gale hospitals were just for show and positive publicity. Even this disaster of a Government would have been well aware there were no staff to run them.

COVID patients need intensive care beds (on the whole) with specialist nursing care and ventilators.

General wards may well not seem full in this scenario.

So it's all bollox as I said.

Ask the general public and the way it's been reported and the majority will think the hospitals are bursting. It's simply not true.

Certain wards may get to capacity...and we have a shortage of specialised staff. We've had two years to rectify this.

How everything is reported to the public is complete and utter nonesence. But as I say...the majority haven't a clue as they rely on mainstream media for their info, and believe every the scientists and Government say...all for the greater good. It's a compete joke and incompetent.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spudski said:

So it's all bollox as I said.

Ask the general public and the way it's been reported and the majority will think the hospitals are bursting. It's simply not true.

Certain wards may get to capacity...and we have a shortage of specialised staff. We've had two years to rectify this.

How everything is reported to the public is complete and utter nonesence. But as I say...the majority haven't a clue as they rely on mainstream media for their info, and believe every the scientists and Government say...all for the greater good. It's a compete joke and incompetent.

Yes the greater problem is the finite number of qualified medical personal rather than "beds".

Each COVID patient on a ventilator needs a "team" of staff to monitor and treat them.

Once we start losing those staff in large numbers to COVID themselves then ..................

It would be better to specify the numbers of intensive care beds available (or not) as a gauge.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, spudski said:

So it's all bollox as I said.

Ask the general public and the way it's been reported and the majority will think the hospitals are bursting. It's simply not true.

Certain wards may get to capacity...and we have a shortage of specialised staff. We've had two years to rectify this.

How everything is reported to the public is complete and utter nonesence. But as I say...the majority haven't a clue as they rely on mainstream media for their info, and believe every the scientists and Government say...all for the greater good. It's a compete joke and incompetent.

Considering the media and opposition fall over themselves to try and attack the government at any oppurtunity that does not stack up

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VT05763 said:

Yes the greater problem is the finite number of qualified medical personal rather than "beds".

Each COVID patient on a ventilator needs a "team" of staff to monitor and treat them.

Once we start losing those staff in large numbers to COVID themselves then ..................

It would be better to specify the numbers of intensive care beds available (or not) as a gauge.

 

Yep.  When you’re trying to spin a message, giving the public sensible, consistent, easy to understand metrics is gonna give the game away. Little things like changing the colour scale on a heatmap of the country back last year should warn you that this government is more interested in PR than PH, and are trying to hide the real message.  Measuring gloves in ones rather than pairs.  I know the box says individual gloves, but if you know that, initially set the targets as individual gloves, and explain to people why you did that…don’t move the goalposts when you fail to set a target.  Why do targets always have to be a round number?  I’d have more faith in the methodology of a target if they said 84,350 tests per week, rather than be bullish 100k that then requires spin to say it’s been hit.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

Considering the media and opposition fall over themselves to try and attack the government at any oppurtunity that does not stack up

Really! Obviously you don’t listen to the political programs. Boris and his cronies are liars. Boris is a proven lair by the law lords. He constantly lies and you buy into his rhetorics. So what part of truth do you accept the little lies, or big lies or the truth within the lies?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, VT05763 said:

Yes the greater problem is the finite number of qualified medical personal rather than "beds".

Each COVID patient on a ventilator needs a "team" of staff to monitor and treat them.

Once we start losing those staff in large numbers to COVID themselves then ..................

It would be better to specify the numbers of intensive care beds available (or not) as a gauge.

 

Exactly...but the general public didn't even question this. Most just presume it's beds and staff...anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

Considering the media and opposition fall over themselves to try and attack the government at any oppurtunity that does not stack up

You are aware that 90% of the media is owned/controlled by fanatical right wing zealots ?

If they are "attacking" the Government you can be sure they have a very good reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spudski said:

Tell me if I've misunderstood this...but this is bollox. We built at the beginning of covid temporary covid hospitals throughout the country.

They all got dismantled and never used, as we were told there wasn't enough drs and nurses ' specialised' to deal with covid.

During the height of covid this year, my father was in Southmead with Brain cancer. The hospital and wards were empty when I visited. Empty... literally.

So it's not beds that are a problem...it's staff. 

Surely we should be building more hospitals and educating staff, and paying them a decent wage. That should be the foremost action, especially as it's been two bloody years now and not expected to stop.

Two friggin years...that we've just accepted to live with and not change.

Should we be building more hospitals and investing in a better healthcare infrastructure? Quite possibly yes.

Does that make it “bollocks” to say that the NHS has a finite capacity and, as things stand, a rapid rise in Covid admissions threatens to overstretch capacity both in terms of beds and availability of staff? And if allowed to completely unravel, threatens treatment for emergencies (of any kind) and other illnesses? Absolutely not.

Certainly our beds-per-citizen ratio is well down on other comparable Western countries, so there’s a strong argument to say we should be investing further (and I would agree).

But the NHS will always have a finite capacity. And it wouldn’t be remotely economically viable to ever have enough redundancy built into the system to cope with a huge spike in demand at any given moment. There will always be a threshold where society has to do it’s bit to stop it bursting at the seams. Rightly or wrongly, Omicron may well require us to do our bit.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChippenhamRed said:

Should we be building more hospitals and investing in a better healthcare infrastructure? Quite possibly yes.

Does that make it “bollocks” to say that the NHS has a finite capacity and, as things stand, a rapid rise in Covid admissions threatens to overstretch capacity both in terms of beds and availability of staff? And if allowed to completely unravel, threatens treatment for emergencies (of any kind) and other illnesses? Absolutely not.

Certainly our beds-per-citizen ratio is well down on other comparable Western countries, so there’s a strong argument to say we should be investing further (and I would agree).

But the NHS will always have a finite capacity. And it wouldn’t be remotely economically viable to ever have enough redundancy built into the system to cope with a huge spike in demand at any given moment. There will always be a threshold where society has to do it’s bit to stop it bursting at the seams. Rightly or wrongly, Omicron may well require us to do our bit.

Agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spudski said:

Tell me if I've misunderstood this...but this is bollox. We built at the beginning of covid temporary covid hospitals throughout the country.

They all got dismantled and never used, as we were told there wasn't enough drs and nurses ' specialised' to deal with covid.

During the height of covid this year, my father was in Southmead with Brain cancer. The hospital and wards were empty when I visited. Empty... literally.

So it's not beds that are a problem...it's staff. 

Surely we should be building more hospitals and educating staff, and paying them a decent wage. That should be the foremost action, especially as it's been two bloody years now and not expected to stop.

Two friggin years...that we've just accepted to live with and not change.

How's your dad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ChippenhamRed said:

Should we be building more hospitals and investing in a better healthcare infrastructure? Quite possibly yes.

Does that make it “bollocks” to say that the NHS has a finite capacity and, as things stand, a rapid rise in Covid admissions threatens to overstretch capacity both in terms of beds and availability of staff? And if allowed to completely unravel, threatens treatment for emergencies (of any kind) and other illnesses? Absolutely not.

Certainly our beds-per-citizen ratio is well down on other comparable Western countries, so there’s a strong argument to say we should be investing further (and I would agree).

But the NHS will always have a finite capacity. And it wouldn’t be remotely economically viable to ever have enough redundancy built into the system to cope with a huge spike in demand at any given moment. There will always be a threshold where society has to do it’s bit to stop it bursting at the seams. Rightly or wrongly, Omicron may well require us to do our bit.

We are as a population all getting older and living with illnesses, kept alive by medication.

Many have underlying health issues.

If we are to continue with this, then yes, we need to invest in more hospitals, more staff, that are paid well and not taken for granted and overworked.

One of the biggest investments is the pharmaceutical industry. An an industry that makes billions.

Keeping people alive that that kept other industries going...fast food, smoking, alcohol.

Then you get a virus come along and we are supposedly all screwed. How anyone can't see this is beyond me...it's totally about money.

If this was about health...the mandate would be clean eating, keeping fit and healthy, building our immune system up and looking after ourselves. 

But there is no money in that. The system makes you I'll, then trys to keep you alive with drugs ??

6 minutes ago, Moments of Pleasure said:

How's your dad?

He past away in the summer.

  • Like 2
  • Flames 1
  • Robin 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harry said:

To be fair, she doesn’t really like football. Just enjoys a day out, plenty of sweets and the chance to put her iPad on after 20 minutes and play some games. 
I don’t think Lodge Road or Cossham Street would be her bag. 

What more would they want on a sat afternoon  than listening to me moaning on about Bentley, Massengo, Baker, Kalas, Martin and Weiman for 90 mins ??

Ps - i see a lot of people have never done a U. Turn to please the kids 

Edited by Rob k
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ChippenhamRed said:

Should we be building more hospitals and investing in a better healthcare infrastructure? Quite possibly yes.

Does that make it “bollocks” to say that the NHS has a finite capacity and, as things stand, a rapid rise in Covid admissions threatens to overstretch capacity both in terms of beds and availability of staff? And if allowed to completely unravel, threatens treatment for emergencies (of any kind) and other illnesses? Absolutely not.

Certainly our beds-per-citizen ratio is well down on other comparable Western countries, so there’s a strong argument to say we should be investing further (and I would agree).

But the NHS will always have a finite capacity. And it wouldn’t be remotely economically viable to ever have enough redundancy built into the system to cope with a huge spike in demand at any given moment. There will always be a threshold where society has to do it’s bit to stop it bursting at the seams. Rightly or wrongly, Omicron may well require us to do our bit.

Investment is in fact going on at this very moment, certainly in Gloucester and no doubt in many other places. It is bed availabilty in some cases but we could have a million empty beds without enough nurses/docs they are useless.

So we train up more docs/nurses then what, we have to be one of the highest pay`ers in the world to keep them here.

Then who pays? we do in the end, so maybe best investing in our own Med Care via private health insurance is the way to go? no idea on cost, prob a packet of fags a week?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've decided not to go tomorrow as well.

I've been pretty ill this week with some (non covid) cold/flu thing which people wouldn't appreciate anyway, it's a lot of hassle, and I don't want to risk catching it right before Christmas - especially as it's my first decent stretch of time off work with my partner and kid in months and months.

I'll still watch it though (and probably clip the goals!) which is a nice backup.

  • Like 7
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spudski said:

We are as a population all getting older and living with illnesses, kept alive by medication.

Many have underlying health issues.

If we are to continue with this, then yes, we need to invest in more hospitals, more staff, that are paid well and not taken for granted and overworked.

One of the biggest investments is the pharmaceutical industry. An an industry that makes billions.

Keeping people alive that that kept other industries going...fast food, smoking, alcohol.

Then you get a virus come along and we are supposedly all screwed. How anyone can't see this is beyond me...it's totally about money.

If this was about health...the mandate would be clean eating, keeping fit and healthy, building our immune system up and looking after ourselves. 

But there is no money in that. The system makes you I'll, then trys to keep you alive with drugs ??

He past away in the summer.

Sorry for your loss Spudski and i agree entirely with your previous post.

We have become obsessed with trying to extend life via an array of medication but the answer is healthy eating and exercise etc. The life we live has to be about quality and not necessarily longevity.  My Dad developed Parkinsons and Dementia in his early 60's and (this is awful to say) the last 5 years of his life were prolonged for no great benefit.

I haven't got involved in the Covid debate on this forum but i believe the average age of death from it to date, is approximately 83. Now whilst all lives are precious we have to put that in context and realise that none of us are immortal. If i reach the age of 83 having lived a decent quality of life (without cancer, dementia, heart disease) then i'd be pretty content.

Anyway, i don't want to spark any kind of Covid confrontation because this forum has been overflowing with it recently. I am double jabbed, with my booster booked shortly but as Spudski intimated in his post, i do feel that we need to look at the bigger picture.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, gl2 said:

Investment is in fact going on at this very moment, certainly in Gloucester and no doubt in many other places. It is bed availabilty in some cases but we could have a million empty beds without enough nurses/docs they are useless.

So we train up more docs/nurses then what, we have to be one of the highest pay`ers in the world to keep them here.

Then who pays? we do in the end, so maybe best investing in our own Med Care via private health insurance is the way to go? no idea on cost, prob a packet of fags a week?

 

 

obviously each country’s system is different but my medication that I’ll be on for life costs me the prescription fee here, in the USA it costs my friends $300ish per prescription and they have medical insurance, I’m not sure I could ever back that, worth noting the USA also spends about double per capita on health care than us, France, Netherlands etc (all who have different systems).
We don’t have to be the highest payers in the world if we can provide quality of life, work life balance etc that you get when you have more doctors & nurses, of course it’s very difficult to train as either of those especially a doctor so it’s much easier said than done, but making it harder for people to come over and be a nurse (it doesn’t really apply to doctors the visa rules makes that easier) probably isn’t going to help, mind you I’m aware that’s flying a bit close to the line on politics which I don’t really want to spend my evening whinging about so I’ll shut up now! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/12/2021 at 22:17, CyderInACan said:

I’ve decided that it’s too close to Christmas to  risk going on Saturday and potentially ruin our normal family Christmas. Having had Covid in late September/early October I’m not really prepared to take the risk of a double whammy on my body in such a short period of time. 

Will watch on RobinsTV and certainly hope for a home win. 
 

I can’t be the only one thinking that attending on Saturday is a potential fool’s errand?
 

 

Same, positive PCR 17/11 so I'm not taking any risks either. I'll find it on IPTV instead.

  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Edgy Red said:

Sorry for your loss Spudski and i agree entirely with your previous post.

We have become obsessed with trying to extend life via an array of medication but the answer is healthy eating and exercise etc. The life we live has to be about quality and not necessarily longevity.  My Dad developed Parkinsons and Dementia in his early 60's and (this is awful to say) the last 5 years of his life were prolonged for no great benefit.

I haven't got involved in the Covid debate on this forum but i believe the average age of death from it to date, is approximately 83. Now whilst all lives are precious we have to put that in context and realise that none of us are immortal. If i reach the age of 83 having lived a decent quality of life (without cancer, dementia, heart disease) then i'd be pretty content.

Anyway, i don't want to spark any kind of Covid confrontation because this forum has been overflowing with it recently. I am double jabbed, with my booster booked shortly but as Spudski intimated in his post, i do feel that we need to look at the bigger picture.

I totally agree with your sentiments. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spudski said:

Tell me if I've misunderstood this...but this is bollox. We built at the beginning of covid temporary covid hospitals throughout the country.

They all got dismantled and never used, as we were told there wasn't enough drs and nurses ' specialised' to deal with covid.

During the height of covid this year, my father was in Southmead with Brain cancer. The hospital and wards were empty when I visited. Empty... literally.

So it's not beds that are a problem...it's staff. 

Surely we should be building more hospitals and educating staff, and paying them a decent wage. That should be the foremost action, especially as it's been two bloody years now and not expected to stop.

Two friggin years...that we've just accepted to live with and not change.

No, what we clearly should be doing is forming some kind of union with our fellow European nations, enabling free movement so that we have a chance of recruiting enough skilled and qualified staff to the NHS. And while we're at it, maybe we could have a go at frictionless trade?!

  • Like 5
  • Flames 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, City Rocker said:

No, what we clearly should be doing is forming some kind of union with our fellow European nations, enabling free movement so that we have a chance of recruiting enough skilled and qualified staff to the NHS. And while we're at it, maybe we could have a go at frictionless trade?!

Stop talking sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ska Junkie said:

Same, positive PCR 17/11 so I'm not taking any risks either. I'll find it on IPTV instead.

Forgive me for asking, and I totally appreciate your decision, but. If you had Covid on 17th November, ie a month ago, I can’t see how you would be at any risk whatsoever of catching it again. I’m therefore incredibly intrigued as to how you reach your decision. 
As I say, this is a genuine question and I appreciate your decision, so I’m not trying to be awkward or anything, just interested as to how the conclusion has been drawn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it worth mentioning that,  whilst I renewed my season ticket in the summer, I haven't yet been to a single City game this season. Reason being I fear infecting seriously ill elderly relatives.

So to be clear, I haven't attended a single football match since March 2020. Anyone else spunking away £350+ this year, or is it just me? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, City Rocker said:

I think it worth mentioning that,  whilst I renewed my season ticket in the summer, I haven't yet been to a single City game this season. Reason being I fear infecting seriously ill elderly relatives.

So to be clear, I haven't attended a single football match since March 2020. Anyone else spunking away £350+ this year, or is it just me? 

Unfortunately, Fear is the key. Live your life as normal as you can, this may go on for awhile yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Harry said:

Forgive me for asking, and I totally appreciate your decision, but. If you had Covid on 17th November, ie a month ago, I can’t see how you would be at any risk whatsoever of catching it again. I’m therefore incredibly intrigued as to how you reach your decision. 
As I say, this is a genuine question and I appreciate your decision, so I’m not trying to be awkward or anything, just interested as to how the conclusion has been drawn. 

A fair question Harry.

I've been left with breathlessness, which is relatively common. even though I've been told I am less susceptible than others due to having it recently, I still feel pretty weak so just don't want to take the risk of getting it again, or anything else, while not being myself.

One of my work colleagues, caught it again just 28 days after his first positive PCR. Given we work in NHS wards (covid included) we know the risks we have to take but him getting it again so quickly has made me understandably sceptical.

A personal choice I totally admit and against all the advice I have been given but not wanting to be poorly again while feeling under the weather is my main concern, particularly at this time of the year.

The club don't miss out as my SC is paid for BTW. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, IAmNick said:

I've decided not to go tomorrow as well.

I've been pretty ill this week with some (non covid) cold/flu thing which people wouldn't appreciate anyway, it's a lot of hassle, and I don't want to risk catching it right before Christmas - especially as it's my first decent stretch of time off work with my partner and kid in months and months.

I'll still watch it though (and probably clip the goals!) which is a nice backup.

I hate the fact people now feel the need to state it’s “not/non covid” when they announce they don’t feel well - this is getting ridiculous ... the stats just don’t support this need for hysteria ... 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

I hate the fact people now feel the need to state it’s “not/non covid” when they announce they don’t feel well - this is getting ridiculous ... the stats just don’t support this need for hysteria ... 

An excess death count of circa 148k people in a little over 18 months. Is that the "hysteria" that you are referring to? 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kid in the Riot said:

An excess death count of circa 148k people in a little over 18 months. Is that the "hysteria" that you are referring to? 

That figure has been debated long and hard elsewhere - so I’d refer you to that discussion, although I’d highlight once again that someone I know died from being electrocuted at work and his death was put down as a Covid death because he’d tested positive a month before his untimely death.

Don’t you think there is now hysteria over this omicron variant? Do you think it is warranted? Reports today suggested there were 16 people in hospital in the UK with omicron and there has been one death - a guy in his seventies who was unvaccinated and died ‘with’ not ‘from’ omicron - South Africa (from where the omicron variant apparently originated) has now reported they are ‘over the peak’ and the number of deaths from omicron over there? Zero ... 

A guy I work with, and his wife, are both isolating at home with omicron right now - they both have underlying health issues, however, he sent me a text saying he ‘feels a bit under the weather but he’s had worse colds’ - I would never underestimate or belittle anyone’s experiences during this pandemic, but I can only draw my own conclusions from the personal experiences I go through and to which I am exposed ... and in many ways, ‘hysteria’ is an appropriate word to sum up some things right now ... I totally get, and respect, that you may feel different and that’s obviously perfectly fine - have a great weekend ?

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

An excess death count of circa 148k people in a little over 18 months. Is that the "hysteria" that you are referring to? 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-1-july-2021/freedom-of-information-request-on-reg-174-for-pfizer-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-foi-21-611?fbclid=IwAR18-qlT1m46b3_pxh-kerCtsfetVdOoQS_Iq_BKlu4hZqt_cyXyX7YR8e0
 

this added to early deaths, and will make you think twice (three) times about having the jab

  • Like 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ska Junkie said:

A fair question Harry.

I've been left with breathlessness, which is relatively common. even though I've been told I am less susceptible than others due to having it recently, I still feel pretty weak so just don't want to take the risk of getting it again, or anything else, while not being myself.

One of my work colleagues, caught it again just 28 days after his first positive PCR. Given we work in NHS wards (covid included) we know the risks we have to take but him getting it again so quickly has made me understandably sceptical.

A personal choice I totally admit and against all the advice I have been given but not wanting to be poorly again while feeling under the weather is my main concern, particularly at this time of the year.

The club don't miss out as my SC is paid for BTW. 

A fair answer. Thank you. 
And I hope you feel better soon. ?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, City Rocker said:

I think it worth mentioning that,  whilst I renewed my season ticket in the summer, I haven't yet been to a single City game this season. Reason being I fear infecting seriously ill elderly relatives.

So to be clear, I haven't attended a single football match since March 2020. Anyone else spunking away £350+ this year, or is it just me? 

Ditto mate, last home game in March 2020 for me too. Last away game Millwall a week or so earlier. Renewed SC with the belief that we might somehow be out of this but I can't risk infecting loved ones.....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose this might help to explain why they are so jumpy about Omicron- let alone NHS staff self-isolating which would only add to the stretched resources.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/dec/16/nhs-hospitals-in-england-94-full-before-start-of-omicron-surge

However we did a generation ago have a lot more NHS beds. Fact. I posted it elsewhere but anyway about 299,000 in late 1980s, early 1990s. Now we don't- we have about 131,000. I'll try to get the exact figures but it's more than halved.

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs-hospital-bed-numbers

Clearly there are many factors to balance but within reason, the more beds you have the more headroom you have. Although Germany with 25k reportedly anyway ICU beds seem to have trouble staffing them- can't win! A report about a nursing shortage there, which reduces the use of that high bed supply. Back to NHS.

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/hospital-beds

Then you have to factor in the population to bed ratio- as our population grew, our beds fell- which leaves yet less margin for error in the event of a major medical emergency.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spudski said:

We are as a population all getting older and living with illnesses, kept alive by medication.

Many have underlying health issues.

If we are to continue with this, then yes, we need to invest in more hospitals, more staff, that are paid well and not taken for granted and overworked.

One of the biggest investments is the pharmaceutical industry. An an industry that makes billions.

Keeping people alive that that kept other industries going...fast food, smoking, alcohol.

Then you get a virus come along and we are supposedly all screwed. How anyone can't see this is beyond me...it's totally about money.

If this was about health...the mandate would be clean eating, keeping fit and healthy, building our immune system up and looking after ourselves. 

But there is no money in that. The system makes you I'll, then trys to keep you alive with drugs ??

He past away in the summer.

Spudski, condolences to you about your dad.

With regards to the virus, my decision to originally be double-jabbed and then have a booster has been based on 2 things. Firstly, the mortality rate since people have received a vaccine has dropped dramatically in comparison to the first and second wave of infections, prior to the vaccine rollout. Even now, with record infections, this is still the case. To me, the vaccines are working.

Secondly, I want to be able to look at myself in the mirror every day and know that I did everything possible to try and stop me spreading it to some poor soul who may die from it. 

  • Like 13
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, City Rocker said:

No, what we clearly should be doing is forming some kind of union with our fellow European nations, enabling free movement so that we have a chance of recruiting enough skilled and qualified staff to the NHS. And while we're at it, maybe we could have a go at frictionless trade?!

That is a very interesting proposition.

Just think, if we were to enable trained medical staff from Europe to come and work in the UK with no restrictions, it would surely help the current labour shortage in the NHS.

Perhaps we could even extend this offer to HGV drivers and other areas in which we are suffering a labour shortage; fruit and vegetable workers, nursing auxiliary staff, for instance.

I wonder if anybody in Government has actually thought of that and, if so, what the response of our European friends might be.

I wonder what the response of the anglophone, pro-Brexit French President might be were we to propose a simple, no tariff trade and labour agreement.

Finally, I wonder how many of the tens of thousands of people who crossed the Channel in flimsy dinghies this year are suitably trained and qualified to assist our understaffed NHS, and would be more than willing to do so, but are not allowed to work (legally) so ‘disappear’ and end up working ( clandestinely, thus illegally) on building sites, in sweat shops, nail bars or, shamefully, in underground brothels.

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...