Jump to content
IGNORED

Ivan Toney


spudski

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Cannybluff said:

These markets are really small and you wouldn't likely make much from that. There are loads of markets much bigger that players can influence that do affect how they make decisions in matches. 

 

Gambling is one of those things that can draw people in. No idea how much he's made on those bets but fairly sure his finances would be secure without it. 

 

Yes, I know a couple of people who overheard, through being in the next room, that Ryan Lowe was going to be the next Plymouth manager several days before it was announced.

Initially I thought "Why didn't you put money on?", but he was the clear odds-on favourite so if you turned up to the bookies with ten grand they would have told you to go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

 

Yes, I know a couple of people who overheard, through being in the next room, that Ryan Lowe was going to be the next Plymouth manager several days before it was announced.

Initially I thought "Why didn't you put money on?", but he was the clear odds-on favourite so if you turned up to the bookies with ten grand they would have told you to go away.

Yes, because Plymouth decided Lowe would be their manager and then waited several days to appoint him. Utter BS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Yes, because Plymouth decided Lowe would be their manager and then waited several days to appoint him. Utter BS. 

 

No, entirely true, or rather true the way I said it rather than your rendering.

It wasn't "appoint" it was "announce".

There is a difference.

This was during the rebuilding of Home Park when their management and admin were in temporary offices.

There was a particular reason for the delay of several days which I don't recall; presumably to do with his previous club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Champfan45 said:

If he's found guilty and subsequently banned, would Brentford be able to sell/loan him out to a foreign league? Or would his contract be terminated 

As far as I understand it, It depends if he has broken FA rules or FIFA rules. I imagine - unless what he has allegedly done is an obscure technicality - a ban would be upheld globally. In terms of whether he had his contract terminated, that would be at Brentford’s discretion and would likely come down to the length of the ban vs the length of time on his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LondonBristolian said:

As far as I understand it, It depends if he has broken FA rules or FIFA rules. I imagine - unless what he has allegedly done is an obscure technicality - a ban would be upheld globally. In terms of whether he had his contract terminated, that would be at Brentford’s discretion and would likely come down to the length of the ban vs the length of time on his contract.

Yep. Kieran Trippier was banned under FA rules but couldn't play for Atletico Madrid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw something today which said :

During this period, Toney was scoring goals in the Championship, where 2/3rds of the teams were sponsored by betting companies. 
He then moved to the Premier league, where half the teams wear a bookies name on the front of their shirt, whilst 18 of the 20 teams have at least 1 betting ‘partner’. 
 

And we wonder why players gamble? 
 

Such hypocrisy. An industry that takes millions (nay billions) from encouraging gambling (which in turn ruins loads of lives), pretends to be all high and mighty when one of their representatives does it. 

  • Like 10
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to add to that. 
Rather than imposing bans to players who clearly have a massive gambling addiction, they should be offering support and counselling to them to get them out of the debilitation of the addiction. 
Especially given the fact that it is so openly encouraged by the receipt of billions of pounds of sponsorship and so there ought to be a responsibility from the recipients of that cash! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harry said:

And to add to that. 
Rather than imposing bans to players who clearly have a massive gambling addiction, they should be offering support and counselling to them to get them out of the debilitation of the addiction. 
Especially given the fact that it is so openly encouraged by the receipt of billions of pounds of sponsorship and so there ought to be a responsibility from the recipients of that cash! 

232 Bets in 4 years isn't really a massive gambling addiction is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Super said:

232 Bets in 4 years isn't really a massive gambling addiction is it?

One bet per week on average is not a massive gambling problem unless he’s betting a massive percentage of his salary. Could well be some fun bets on a weekend.  If it is just that then a long ban seems an overreaction. If he’s bet on brentford games then it would be deserved 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Gillies Downs Leeds said:

An ex local manager had a 3 yr ban imposed for betting on football matches involving his own team.

Was that the Frome manager? Bunyard I believe? if not, he also suffered the same fate. dozens of bets against his own team

Some would defend it by saying it's hedging your bets - win your happy, lose you've won some money back but it's not allowed even at that level. I remember start of each season we used to get a memo in the changing room reminding us we couldn't bet - but at that level it's very difficult to police unless you're betting huge amounts that gain attention (or stupid bets) or someone knows about it and whistle-blows.

I see @Harry's post and there's a certain sense of irony that you play in a league sponsored by a gambling company, with a gambling company on your shirt with gambling adverts everywhere during broadcasts and at pitchside - all done to entice people to gamble - but dont you dare get tempted.

Not saying it's right, but it's not a great look. I don't like how intrinsically linked gambling is with sport personally.

As for Toney, this clearly had a factor in his selection for England. Gareth has shown before that the team is bigger than an individual and won't include players clouded in controversy. He was the first to drop Greenwood, whether he knew about the allegations or just based on attitude and the Iceland incident who knows, but appears he's a good judge of character. He got rid of Madison after that casino trip too when he'd pulled out of England duty.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Super said:

232 Bets in 4 years isn't really a massive gambling addiction is it?

That’s the bets he’s made which are against FA rules. 
I’m sure if he’s gambling on stuff he’s not allowed to, he’s likely gambling on a heck of a lot else too. 
Bloke needs help, guidance and counselling, not banning and castigating. 
And football needs to unwed itself from the financial grip of the bookies. 

Edited by Harry
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, And Its Smith said:

One bet per week on average is not a massive gambling problem unless he’s betting a massive percentage of his salary. Could well be some fun bets on a weekend.  If it is just that then a long ban seems an overreaction. If he’s bet on brentford games then it would be deserved 

It’s not about having a gambling problem, just that it’s against the rules as Spud shows below.

1 hour ago, spudski said:

I thought anyone associated with a Club wasn't allowed to bet on football fullstop.

Players, managers, coaching staff, club staff. Refs etc.

All explained here.

https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/policies/betting-rules

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MarcusX said:

Was that the Frome manager? Bunyard I believe? if not, he also suffered the same fate. dozens of bets against his own team

Some would defend it by saying it's hedging your bets - win your happy, lose you've won some money back but it's not allowed even at that level. I remember start of each season we used to get a memo in the changing room reminding us we couldn't bet - but at that level it's very difficult to police unless you're betting huge amounts that gain attention (or stupid bets) or someone knows about it and whistle-blows.

I see @Harry's post and there's a certain sense of irony that you play in a league sponsored by a gambling company, with a gambling company on your shirt with gambling adverts everywhere during broadcasts and at pitchside - all done to entice people to gamble - but dont you dare get tempted.

Not saying it's right, but it's not a great look. I don't like how intrinsically linked gambling is with sport personally.

As for Toney, this clearly had a factor in his selection for England. Gareth has shown before that the team is bigger than an individual and won't include players clouded in controversy. He was the first to drop Greenwood, whether he knew about the allegations or just based on attitude and the Iceland incident who knows, but appears he's a good judge of character. He got rid of Madison after that casino trip too when he'd pulled out of England duty.

Yep Bunyard I was referring to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Yes, because Plymouth decided Lowe would be their manager and then waited several days to appoint him. Utter BS. 

Wasn't Lowe appointed pre season? Therefore a few days could quite easily have been possible and not announced, as the players and staff could have all been on leave?

Closer to home surely we didn't decide Holden was our man on the actual day he was appointed? I'd say that decision was made more than a few days before appointing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...