Jump to content
IGNORED

Everton FFP- yes


Mr Popodopolous

Recommended Posts

It's a really lenient punishment for extreme losses, the punishment happens at a time where Everton can overcome the deduction in probably the weakest premiership league in recent years. It's frustrating that the punishment will not have the impact of warrants.

Edited by Fammyfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

This should have happened last season. The premier league dragged it out. They'd have been relegated last season if this didn't take so long. Can see the relegated clubs taking legal action against the premier league and or Everton now. 

 

 

They did more than drag it out, they told Burnley, Leeds and Leicester that Everton had not breached FFP.

This late action is simply in support of the Premier League's continued lobbying to water down the powers of the Independent Regulator.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Screenshot_20231117-125133_OneDrive.thumb.jpg.e3a3cf0bf8256fd009f9557384afec40.jpg

Seems the PL reject the concept of player trading related P&S exclusions.

Over to you EFL?

I’m not sure it does.

The difference (£32.7m) between Everton’s £87.1m and PL’s view that it should be £120.8m suggests it could be anything.  The transfer trading was £61m, so it’s not that, although it could be partly of that I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, pillred said:

Yes I see now of course everyone moves up one place (face palms himself :laugh:)

To be fair to you, until they updated their article a few minutes ago, the BBC were also reporting that they were 5 points from safety so you were in good company! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, chinapig said:

They did more than drag it out, they told Burnley, Leeds and Leicester that Everton had not breached FFP.

This late action is simply in support of the Premier League's continued lobbying to water down the powers of the Independent Regulator.

Aha I remember that now! 

There is going to be some lawyers rubbing their hands together right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I’m not sure it does.

The difference (£32.7m) between Everton’s £87.1m and PL’s view that it should be £120.8m suggests it could be anything.  The transfer trading was £61m, so it’s not that, although it could be partly of that I guess. 

I'll have to go back and re-read everything again later. On that particular issue though, it seemed to be Everton argued for it and PL against.

There was multiple issues, the claim that was in some media back in June that it was just a minor tax issue seems to have been completely incorrect or false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...