Jump to content
IGNORED

Scott Twine - Loan Confirmed - No option to buy


Shauntaylor85

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Apart from one being largely about technical skill, the other much more about distance covered, stamina, work rate & press.

Twine being a 10, or wide midfielder, Brownhill best centrally in midfield.

That’s just for starters.

Thanks Graham, useful info. I’ve just watched a 3 minute clip of “highlights” so I couldn’t get much from it as you can tell. I’d normally sit and do some research, but I’ve just had a newborn so as you can imagine I’m elbows deep in crying and nappies (and that’s just @W-S-M Seagull posts 😉)

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Major Isewater said:

What are the Hull fans saying ? 
 

https://www.not606.com/threads/january-transfer-thread.409767/page-165

Twine had some good moments. But it took him a while to get going here and whilst he looked to be getting it right I don't think its a bad move for us....Frees up a space to bring in a new body. Just where that will be is anyone's guess. Watch this space. Good luck to Bristol, Scott.

2 of Twines goal involvements were superb solo efforts by Philogene and Connolly that Twine just happened to be the one to lay it off to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ChrisJ said:

It probably is one of the best in the champ - why wouldn’t it be, miles ahead of most in this league.

Leicester, Southampton, Middlesborough, Sunderland, Leeds, Coventry all better imo. At least another 5 that are on a par with ours. Certainly anything but miles ahead of most in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sir Geoff said:

Leicester, Southampton, Middlesborough, Sunderland, Leeds, Coventry all better imo. At least another 5 that are on a par with ours. Certainly anything but miles ahead of most in the league.

I've not been to Leicesters ground, but the others, in terms of facilites, are nowhere near as good as Ashton Gate imo. Leeds facilities are disgraceful, like going back to the 70s and the ground is falling apart.

Boro located in an an industrial area, nothing there, Coventry in the middle of nowhere, nothing there.

Anyway, wrong thread for this...........

Edited by bcfc01
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sir Geoff said:

Leicester, Southampton, Middlesborough, Sunderland, Leeds, Coventry all better imo. At least another 5 that are on a par with ours. Certainly anything but miles ahead of most in the league.

Funny cos Leeds fans will openly say their ground is a dive, falling apart and hasn’t been touched in decades. But of course you know more than they do 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RedRaw said:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="qme" dir="ltr">👀 <a href="https://t.co/cq8Q6RlkiM">pic.twitter.com/cq8Q6RlkiM</a></p>&mdash; Bristol City FC (@BristolCity) <a href="https://twitter.com/BristolCity/status/1746943344599589197?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 15, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yep, exactly what I was going to post.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...