sh1t_ref_again Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: I'm confused, I thought the reason we took Conway off was with today in mind? It makes no sense. Perhaps picked up a knock or wanting to bring on as a lively sub Quote Link to comment
Gazred Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: I'm confused, I thought the reason we took Conway off was with today in mind? It makes no sense. Maybe you thought wrong. We've got another game in 3 days. He'll probably still get some mins today. 3 Quote Link to comment
HoldenBall Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 4 minutes ago, cidercity1987 said: Cornick has deserved a start Hope to see him do well today Has he????? 1 Quote Link to comment
extonsred Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 May just be that selections based on those recovering best from Wednesday. 3 1 Quote Link to comment
EstoniaTallinnRed Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 17 hours ago, BigTone said: Had pre op scans today ready for my second knee replacement and having trouble walking after. Other than that the wine is chilled !!! All the best with it Tone, now you have a good excuse for sitting and enjoying your red wine. Iv'e just bought a bottle of Chillian Cabernet Sauvignon, I think we will enjoy that tonight, especially if we get a good result. 1 Quote Link to comment
GrahamC Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 4 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: I'm confused, I thought the reason we took Conway off was with today in mind? It makes no sense. Wells scored our last league goal & there are 3 games this week. I’m pretty relaxed about it, it’s not like we are asking someone from the U18s to play in place of TC, is it? 4 Quote Link to comment
W-S-M Seagull Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, GrahamC said: Wells scored our last league goal & there are 3 games this week. I’m pretty relaxed about it, it’s not like we are asking someone from the U18s to play in place of TC, is it? Yea I get you but I had assumed the rationale around taking off our main penalty taker on Wednesday was to rest him for today. Quote Link to comment
redkev Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 Probably the freshest eleven we could play , like others have said lots of games , no doubt if we lose it will be mannings fault for changing it , if we keep the same team and players get injured it’s mannings fault again , pretty strong bench mind 3 Quote Link to comment
italian dave Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, W-S-M Seagull said: Yea I get you but I had assumed the rationale around taking off our main penalty taker on Wednesday was to rest him for today. Or, to win it in 120 mins…..which we very nearly did! 1 Quote Link to comment
Garland-sweden Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 Hope we can play good and score in the leauge. Time for Cornick ? Always believe COYR!!! 1 Quote Link to comment
BS3 Ark at Ee Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 Cornick needs a strong performance Quote Link to comment
W-S-M Seagull Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, italian dave said: Or, to win it in 120 mins…..which we very nearly did! I did see your other reply but I got distracted and forgot to reply. You made a very good point! I thought Wells and Cornick were excellent. They battled hard against a tired defence and like you said on another day one of them score and we'd be talking about what great subs they were. But I left the ground feeling annoyed that we lost on penalties having subbed off our best penalty taker. Quote Link to comment
Gazred Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 4 minutes ago, italian dave said: We're not short of cones are we, looks like a minefield! 1 Quote Link to comment
BigTone Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 3 minutes ago, Gazred said: We're not short of cones are we, looks like a minefield! Need my eyes tested. I thought it said BIORIO in the stand !! 2 Quote Link to comment
W-S-M Seagull Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 16 minutes ago, Gazred said: Maybe you thought wrong. We've got another game in 3 days. He'll probably still get some mins today. If I thought wrong then that makes the decision to sub him even more stupid. Our league season is done. Beating Forest would have been worth around a million quid for us. Quote Link to comment
BigTone Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 5 minutes ago, BS3 Ark at Ee said: Cornick needs a strong performance Or a transfer 3 3 Quote Link to comment
JAWS Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 6 minutes ago, BS3 Ark at Ee said: Cornick needs a strong performance He couldn't finish steak n chips! 1 Quote Link to comment
Gazred Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 Just now, W-S-M Seagull said: If I thought wrong then that makes the decision to sub him even more stupid. Our league season is done. Beating Forest would have been worth around a million quid for us. We tried and very nearly beat them in ET. Not sure why that's stupid but that's your opinion not mine. Quote Link to comment
Simple Red Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 24 minutes ago, cidercity1987 said: Cornick has deserved a start Hope to see him do well today I hope that you are right. He does put the effort in, but if he is in contention next Year, then we are not moving in the right direction. Quote Link to comment
W-S-M Seagull Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 Just now, Gazred said: We tried and very nearly beat them in ET. Not sure why that's stupid but that's your opinion not mine. We lost by missing a penalty so its valid to challenge the decision to take off our main penalty taker. Had we of lost in extra time I'd not be making this point. 1 Quote Link to comment
Davefevs Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 7 really usable outfield subs today. No excuses to not replace fatigue in-match or players not playing well. Cmon City, a game we can return home with the points. 2 Quote Link to comment
Gazred Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 Just now, W-S-M Seagull said: We lost by missing a penalty so its valid to challenge the decision to take off our main penalty taker. Had we of lost in extra time I'd not be making this point. Nah, i don't agree with that. Anyway, back to today's game. COYR Quote Link to comment
transfer reader Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 17 minutes ago, italian dave said: and people talk about our season ticket holders who dont turn up! Quote Link to comment
Tim Monaghan Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 3 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: We lost by missing a penalty so its valid to challenge the decision to take off our main penalty taker. Had we of lost in extra time I'd not be making this point. Go on, mention Pearson, you know you want to. 3 Quote Link to comment
italian dave Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 (edited) 14 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: I did see your other reply but I got distracted and forgot to reply. You made a very good point! I thought Wells and Cornick were excellent. They battled hard against a tired defence and like you said on another day one of them score and we'd be talking about what great subs they were. But I left the ground feeling annoyed that we lost on penalties having subbed off our best penalty taker. Of course. Tho’ in fairness, both Wells and Cornick scored their pens, so had we left TC on at the expense of one of them it would have made no difference. That’s how I’m managing my annoyance, anyway I take no credit for that point; I think you made it first!! Edited February 10 by italian dave Quote Link to comment
Back of the Dolman Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 7 minutes ago, JAWS said: He couldn't finish steak n chips! Surely that depends on how big the portion is 1 Quote Link to comment
mozo Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 20 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: Yea I get you but I had assumed the rationale around taking off our main penalty taker on Wednesday was to rest him for today. Yeah that's definitely what I thought so I guess there must be a medical reason. Conway's undoubtedly first choice if fit Quote Link to comment
transfer reader Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 4 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said: We lost by missing a penalty so its valid to challenge the decision to take off our main penalty taker. Had we of lost in extra time I'd not be making this point. but you'd have found something different to moan about. Quote Link to comment
BCFC31 Posted February 10 Report Share Posted February 10 2 hours ago, mozo said: That might be the one. That goal was an absolute beaut. The old cliche: there's a player in there Yeah I was at that game he's certainly a frustration is bell Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.