Jump to content
IGNORED

SOTC - Fans Panel (live now)


Davefevs

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

Presenter: "I think you only need 3 maybe 4 players and this team could really go places" re: going to Manning style football.

However, with departures that still leaves us with a paper thin squad. And for those 3 or 4 players to turn us into a team that can dominate opponents in possession terms they need to be best in division type players and those aren't "100 games in League One" types, they cost £5m plus, each.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep hearing here not just on here or this show.."Big physical 9".

Yes and no. IMO. Does that fit "Manning ball"? Seems a bit mix and match..

3 penalties and 1 own goal in our favour under Manning..what was the comparable under NP?

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
5 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Just checked.

Under  NP- 15 goals, 14 games.

Fleming- 1 goal, 1 game.

Manning- 28 goals, 23 games BUT 3 penalties and 1 own goal.

Weighted for that 24 from 23..about the same if not proportionally worse.

Isn't goals conceded worse despite club apologists claiming Liam has tightened us up?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ian M said:

Isn't goals conceded worse despite club apologists claiming Liam has tightened us up?

Technically, but imo not meaningfully.

Pearson was on 16 in 15 this season; 1.14 p/g

Manning on 29 in 23; 1.26 p/g

It's really a very small difference considering you can't actually score part of a goal.

General shots against and shots on target against are basically the same. xG against is actually slightly better under Manning.

Edit: also, it is deteriorating under Manning. Over his first few games it did appear that we'd tightened up a little at the back, but it's gone downhill in recent games.

Edited by ExiledAjax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, ExiledAjax said:

Technically, but imo not meaningfully.

Pearson was on 16 in 15 this season; 1.14 p/g

Manning on 29 in 26; 1.26 p/g

It's really a very small difference considering you can't actually score part of a goal.

General shots against and shots on target against are basically the same. xG against is actually slightly better under Manning.

But certainly isn't "tightened us up defensively" by any metric.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

Technically, but imo not meaningfully.

Pearson was on 16 in 15 this season; 1.14 p/g

Manning on 29 in 26; 1.26 p/g

It's really a very small difference considering you can't actually score part of a goal.

General shots against and shots on target against are basically the same. xG against is actually slightly better under Manning.

Edit: also, it is deteriorating under Manning. Over his first few games it did appear that we'd tightened up a little at the back, but it's gone downhill in recent games.

It has been 23 games in the League, are we measuring in all competitions or? That was my initial.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

It has been 23 games in the League, are we measuring in all competitions or? That was my initial.

Yes it is. But it's still 1.26 p/g. I was looking at the goals for column for my 26🤦🏼‍♂️

3 minutes ago, Ian M said:

But certainly isn't "tightened us up defensively" by any metric.

Quite.

Edited by ExiledAjax
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

Dels a great guy but repeating the Tinnion claim that’s been debunked of McKenna only winning 2 in 12 is a big credibility misstep

Is it ? Do you check every stat you are told?  I think it’s fair to assume when someone in Tinnion’s position gives a stat it’s correct 

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Is it ? Do you check every stat you are told?  I think it’s fair to assume when someone in Tinnion’s position gives a stat it’s correct 

I'd agree, however it's Tinnion, so it's unlikely to be correct either innocently through his own misunderstanding or him manipulating. It's probably more likely the first, though. 

Edited by Randy Marsh II
  • Like 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Is it ? Do you check every stat you are told?  I think it’s fair to assume when someone in Tinnion’s position gives a stat it’s correct 

When people in "Tinnion's position" generally give out stats I would tend to agree but when TINNION gives out a stat I wouldn't believe a word of it without checking. I mean he told us we beat Southampton 3-0, must be right..............

  • Like 4
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Is it ? Do you check every stat you are told?  I think it’s fair to assume when someone in Tinnion’s position gives a stat it’s correct 

Well when…

- James Piercy community noted it

- It was said on here as being false

and

- It’s Tinnion who is a known bullshitter

Then I’d say yeah, you do check before repeating it as fact!

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Silvio Dante said:

Well when…

- James Piercy community noted it

- It was said on here as being false

and

- It’s Tinnion who is a known bullshitter

Then I’d say yeah, you do check before repeating it as fact!

As far as I know, Del doesn’t post on here so not sure of the relevance. Maybe he didn’t read Piercy’s bit. 
 

Agreed that Tinnion is either a bullshiter or stupid 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Just checked.

Under  NP- 15 goals, 14 games.

Fleming- 1 goal, 1 game.

Manning- 28 goals, 23 games BUT 3 penalties and 1 own goal.

Weighted for that 24 from 23..about the same if not proportionally worse.

image.thumb.png.efdbaab0480a856f3428e9f05ac3c258.png

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...