Ian M

23 minutes ago, Stockwood gate said:

Yes you can but only by telephone I did it this afternoon no problem at all, moved a block over 

Yay, common sense exists in Supporter Services!

Just now, BCFC1512 said:

So I can’t move seats in the south stand?? Showing as nothing available, surely it’s not sold out!!

No new sales are allowed. If you're already in the SS, you might get some success if you directly contact Supporter Services as common sense dictates you'd just be moving from one part to another. But do they have common sense?

14 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

I’d be surprised if we didn’t hit 10k - the 8k mentioned by Marshall was as at Thursday, and many left it late to renew as we know.

But I’d be equally surprised if there was a large number of seat moves. People will be reticent to move from the South Stand as they can’t get back there now. Possibly a few hundred overall.

The number of 15000 mentioned as this seasons figure on the pod and ambition to grow it do feel unlikely for a number of reasons. Ultimately ST holders miss odd games but the volume missing from several recent games does suggest a degree of disillusion.

My guess is we hit around 12-13k sales overall. Down on last year due to several reasons:

- Disillusion and dissatisfaction with club hierarchy (think that’s #1)

- Cost of living crisis remains ongoing and it becomes a necessary or reasonable sacrifice

- Unhappiness with management/style in some quarters 

- The new TV deal (I think that’s a tiny factor - the club haven’t publicised and it won’t be known unless you look)

It’s still a decent number and bigger than our neighbours capacity. Won’t be any joy from me if the number is down but if the hierarchy think the main reason is anything but them then I think they’re probably not reading the room

I also think a small factor to add to your point about the Cost of Living crisis, there may be non-season ticket holders who fancy picking one up but because the club are saving the freed spots in the South Stand for individual matchday sales, are priced out of it.

2 hours ago, Puckle_red said:

A midfield player who rarely scores, doesn't run with the ball, isn't strong in the air, rarely passes forward and is injury prone. But he tries really hard and makes rash tackles - seems a perfect fit for a Bristol City midfielder at this level.

I wonder if this part is accurate as, in my mind, Joe is our CM most likely to look to play incisive forward passes this season. But he does have the odd game where his passing is atrocious. Fortunately those have been fewer of late imo.

Just now, Davefevs said:

I still think we need a no10, just think there are better fits and better value options than Twine.

Oh 100%, that's why I said still sign one....just not at Twine's price.
If LM wants to play 2 AMCs then we need more than Mehmeti, Sykes and Stokes as the options because we must never play Knight there, he's too important / better further back.

4 minutes ago, Leabrook said:

Those of us that said sack him have to start admitting soon that we got it wrong. He’s making progress. Seagulls might not like it but that’s what’s happening 

Of all Manning's games, I think today was actually my favourite despite not winning. I believe Norwich had won something like 8 straight home games and we went there and with different officials might have won that game 2-0. But I was more pleased that after a pretty decent 1st half, we didn't follow it up with a turgid 2nd and actually played better in the second period imo. I feel like the players looked more confident in their touches and passing too which gives me more confidence that Liam could have us on the right path at last.

34 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Indeed.

Sat here tonight, not that it really matters, I think he’s earned the chance to take us into the summer.  How big of me!

To explain (all imho), I think there’s been enough from the turn in performances since Easter to think we aren’t gonna revert to the turgid stuff that for me was more the norm than the Southampton / FA Cup games / performances.

There are still some concerns, but if we carry on with the bit more intent shown, taking opportunities to win the ball high-up for example then I think Leicester, Blackburn and today are more representative of how we will play than Sunderland on reflection.  I think playing Knight deeper is more the causation than Twine which is correlation.  I felt Knight did an admirable job playing the role he did, but he’s much more effective for the team playing from a deeper role.

So, I’m out of “sack Manning” territory.

I feel like Mehmeti has potentially shown enough promise there to make Twine too expensive (as if he wasn't already) and we may do well to look at bringing in another project to develop into that role (alongside Stokes) as you could view the initial Mehmeti signing.

Aside from his goal I think having someone as comfortable on the ball as Roberts as one of the 3 CBs (along with Dickie) stops this system being as negative as some variants are.

Norwich gave MotM to their goalie.

1 minute ago, old_eastender said:

just saw the reply, Cornick made a right mess of that, should have scored.

He did though

Was just waiting expectantly for the offside flag. I await Nick’s replay with interest.

Norwich TV commentary pair love us.

On 15/04/2024 at 09:34, Davefevs said:

EFL Teams of the season:

 

An ex-City player in each one!

I don't know a great deal about L2 but I found it surprising that only 1 player from the champions features in their team.

So Robins TV will remain an option for those who are more able to take a quick flight to the continent than travel to AG. Or those who already live abroad.

1 hour ago, BCFC1512 said:

Where’s Murphy 

Doing a third pre-season?

1 hour ago, mozo said:

Here's a question... How many hat-tricks does that front 6 have this season? Maybe as many as 8?!!

Kane 4
Palmer 2
Foden 2

None for the other three.

Just now, ExiledAjax said:

Haha. Probably because he's been in charge for 2/3 of the season!

But noteworthy that the two clubs in the bottom 2 who we played after making the change, also changed their managers to considerable upside.

Equally we can all laugh at Sunderland and Birmingham

7 hours ago, Andy082005 said:

Show us the league table of how it would look after all the games Manning has been in charge of?

that would be more reflective 

Pretty similar to the overall league table.

Just now, Wanderingred said:

Idiot 

Spoiler alert:

20 mins later the same poster types “Manning In”

Toby: of course good teams rescue points from bad situations so I guess that shows how good we are.

Carey: yeah it was great coaching and management from City!

No shots on or off target for us. Fun.

2 minutes ago, cidercity1987 said:

Never seen us line up without a CB before 

Depending on your opinion of Naismith’s primary position, Pearson was forced to for successive matches leading into that West Brom game.

If he wants to maintain the same shape hasn’t Williams filled in at CB for us before?

25 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Yep, that’s partly down to us not doing many transfers, but not succumbing eith, I guess.

But seems a little strange for a club with a "top 10 budget".

Won't it largely be an extension of the red button service currently on offer rather than moving more kick off times?