Jump to content

Dan Robin

Members
  • Posts

    3056
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dan Robin

  1. 2 hours ago, Davefevs said:

    Ref deserves credit. Very consistent and good decision making thru the 90. 

    Maybe better than usual (no penalty claims, etc.), but he still ignored many fouls - included 2 or 3 nasty ones - on our players and gave us more yellow cards despite doing less - and lighter - fouls than them.

    Anyway, the most important thing is that we got a win and favourable results in the other matches.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. Three golden points: well done, Robins! ?

    Second half IMO was quite good, except the last minutes, when we could have conceded a dangerous second goal: overall the team looked tidy and the lads didn't get nervous about the unbalanced refereeing (not a surprise, eh?).

    Many good performances, but our best players for me were Conway, Naismith (despite his part of fault in Millers goal) and O'Leary.

  3. Bentley seems to be on the transfer list like Massengo, Kalas still unavailable, question marks about Klose and Weimann (rumoured to have suffered an injury with Austria, right?), Martin out of favour, not sure about Tanner's availability (red card), so....

     

    O' Leary, Vyner, Naismith, Atkinson, Sykes, James, Williams, Pring, Scott, Wells, Conway. Subs: Bentley, Dasilva, Klose (?), King, Massengo, Semenyo, Weimannn (?) or Martin.

  4. 2 minutes ago, City_USA said:

    . How we still keep our penalty dry streak going I'll never know 

    Until the club will remain silent instead of asking questions to RA and EFL, nothing will change. But it seems that it's all OK, that many supporters are happy with referees disrespecting our players, so... ?

    Pessimistic about the second half, but hope to be proved wrong.

  5. Makes it more frustrating that we could have gained three huge points against a strong team if they weren't helped by the referee. I bet that in similar conditions (Blades playing not at their best) other teams won't have to face that "handicap" and they'll get precious points.

  6. You're wrong: we lost some games mainly because of the refs, and saying it doesn't make a supporter less objective. 

    Blades did almost nothing and had one player saved from a red, one goal saved by a foul/offside and one penalty claim ignored (soft or not it remains a crucial call). Playing badly and making mistakes can still make you win if the key decisions go against the other team; the way you play doesn't justify unbalanced refereeings.

    If we had scored in the first half and then be punished by two joke penalties for them (realistic possibility), would it be still City's fault?

    Gift us a joke penalty in the first 10 minutes against Birmingham, Reading etc. and then let's see what happens in those matches...

    You could be a rock in defence and still be punished with a joke penalty, being more clinical but seeing a goal ruled out for an offside that doesn't exist, etc  Team and manager have to try their best to beat their opponents, but can't control refereeings...and too many supporters forget this simple thing.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...