Jump to content

Steve Watts

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    4372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Steve Watts

  1. Bury are gone. Takeover has fallen through. Sad times
  2. That ground doesn't have a lot of football in 2019 either!
  3. But completely understandable.... I mean, no other team is wearing da faymuss quarterzzzzz mind!
  4. They'll be telling everyone that they've gone from being 60 % full to 65% and point to it as progress....rather than because of them reducing the amount of inbreds they can get in there. Because they're loyal and prowed.
  5. To improve the percentage of capacity figures.....
  6. No need.... as it's such a common mistake, we'll just mark 'ee down as an honest error........
  7. Don't sweat it.... For all in tents and purposes it's an easy mistake to make.......
  8. No, but the can fill something with five fingers....usually their sisters.
  9. I'm in a betting group on WhatsApp with people all over the world. This was just posted in the group....
  10. Obviously regardless of who is on board, let's hope they're found safe and sound. From a selfish point of view....where does Steve live? Can never remember which Channel Island it is....
  11. And of course his well utilised Chelsea connection!
  12. This guy ain't wrong, mind...(well...besides his spelling! "My memory of cotterall, are the shocking interviews near the end of his reign at City. Blaming everybody but himself, extremely rude and uncomfortable even for a Rovers fan who should have been amused. May well be a good choice to avoid relegation, but that would mean an extension to his contract before abusing all and sundry. Don't want him near the club Read more: http://gasheads.org/thread/7920/steve-cotterill-rag-bag-rovers#ixzz5a2D4H2ZO" And this just sums Rovers up: Cotterill did a great job and cheltenham,he also kept a relegation threatened city in league one and the next season won league one at a canter. He also likes direct football which wouldn't bother me at all as it beats tapping it around at the back any day of the week. Hes not articulate in interviews but who gives a stuff about that? Read more: http://gasheads.org/thread/7920/steve-cotterill-rag-bag-rovers#ixzz5a2EikWlR
  13. If you want a Gasheads comeback you'll need to scrape it off their sisters teeth.......
  14. In which case, the club is theirs for £300k!
  15. Whereas I read "33 seater" and thought he was hiring a new stand for the club!
  16. Similarly, aren't all Bristol Rovers account holders related? Hey, Uncle Dad, high six!
  17. The irony is truly astounding! "I see they're also getting some flack over their treatment of disabled fans, although to be fair to the retards who frequent One Turd they are unhappy about that. Kind of brings to mind the disabled fan who was ill treated at Trashton that Henners rehabilitated to The Gas. But that's somehing else the 6 digited Mongs don't like to talk about."
  18. What a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation some of them have.... The Pakistani Pirates! Never mind the other BAME people currently not interested in going into their hell hole.
  19. And those parking spaces don't paint themselves you know!
  20. I've not been able to find anything about it at all....however it appears as though they have a level 3 academy, so I wonder if that is what all development teams became perhaps when Academies were first introduced and applications were required to promote to higher academy status. Their ultimate aim is to be a cat 2 academy....you know.... the level we're aiming to leave trailing behind us!
  21. "We shouldn't think that this will always be the case. If AFC Bournemouth, or Swansea or even Huddersfield Town wanted one of 82's best players they would be able to get them. If not now at the end of the season when and if they stay up and the sh** don't go up. Bristol Rovers have a bigger fan base than all of those clubs and have the potential to do equally as well provided that one day we have owners capable and willing to invest."
  22. Thing is though, the way I read the post, it's not the kid that nicked it, but the older "gent" in the background. He keeps referring to "the guy", not the kid, and did mention that it was "the guy on the right of this picture.... They may have completely the wrong person that they're naming in any case!
  23. You know that's rubbish.... their sisters always put out!
×
×
  • Create New...