Jump to content

ChippenhamRed

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    11305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

Posts posted by ChippenhamRed

  1. Cracking news,never fancied watching us in a stadium that was over half empty every other week anyway

    This argument represents a very short term view.  Ultimately the new stadium would give the club a chance to be more financially sustainable, be able to attract better players, and ultimately be more successful.  This would then bring in the bigger crowds.  I just don't think the redeveloped AG could do this to the same extent.

  2. Not for me. A shiny new Stadium with all the added benefits would have been great and my preference but this is a very good "next best thing" IMO.

     

    I won't be at all disappointed if/when we re-develop Ashton Gate.

    Disagree.  Compared to a brand new stadium this is a very poor alternative.  That's why it was only proposed once it became apparent the new stadium may never happen. 

     

    A revamped AG will never be able to generate the revenue a new stadium would have.  On top of that, the new stadium was achitecturally different whereas the redeveloped ground is much more the like the 'souless bowl' we all fear.  If we are forced to choose this distinctly second-best option it will be to the deteriment of the club and the city and, for me, will forever be a symbol of Bristol's antipathy towards sport and progress in general.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...