Jump to content

joe jordans teeth

Members
  • Posts

    11436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by joe jordans teeth

  1. 1 hour ago, Gaseater said:

    His agreement to spend the **** all money we had on dross like Mehmeti, crap spells time and time again, calling players out in public. Did his job, replaced with the wrong man from the look of things.

    This is brilliant,do you think he wanted him or someone above him wanted him,the same man who said we have a top 6 squad 

  2. 1 minute ago, LondonBristolian said:

    Ultimately the buck still stops with Manning though. If your players can’t execute the game plan then it is the wrong game plan - no matter how it looks on paper.

    Unlike some points in the last few years, believe that the vast majority  - and perhaps all - of our players give 100% and want to succeed for themselves and for each other. If they are giving their all and not delivering the game plan then the question has to be whether it is the right game plan for the players.

    Simple closing down is a must for any player,I’m not having Manning has told them not to because we saw it against Southampton so something isn’t right 

  3. 3 minutes ago, petehinton said:

    Yet conveniently, when saying how important training time was, said the first goal against Southampton was down to them having more time “on the grass” to practise throw ins. 

    He is making it up on the hop clearly,don’t think the players are helping him mind to be honest with not doing the basics so it’s not a one way street 

  4. 2 minutes ago, Sheltons Army said:

    A lot to answer

     

    But , I’d strongly suggest that both loan signings are %100 Liam Manning ‘signings’

    What about the permanent signings,tinnion has all his fingers over them 

    • Like 1
    • Flames 1
  5. Just now, Capman said:

    Think you should change the title to the board. Problem is in the boardroom not the just the dugout. 

    We know they read this site,until there is constant pressure on certain people they will continue to have the ear of the people in charge,stop blaming managers and go for the person who actually needs the boot 

    • Flames 1
  6. 2 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

    If Chair can still play pending/during Appeal, should that be allowed?

    Some reports suggest he could be.

    If he is a free man then of course,I would hope the club would say nah you’re not playing but I guess they will still be paying him so they are in between a rock and a hard place,fully intended 

    • Like 1
  7. 11 minutes ago, RoystonFoote'snephew said:

    I certainly agree that people need to take responsibility for their own actions but I'm not sure where 'do gooders', come into it. I would like to think that we would all 'do good' in the correct circumstances. 

    By do gooders I mean the people saying if they had boys clubs and education they could be turned around,give it a rest 

  8. 30 minutes ago, spudski said:

    I'm not trying to justify his actions, just pointing out how easy it is to go to prison from injuring someone. If he had a bump on his head, the sentence would have been less. Like I said fine margins. 

    The Mirror called it a rock...then quoted this...

    In January, Antwerp's public prosecutor told a hearing: "According to many people involved, Ilias Chair lashed out at Niels T with a stone and knocked him unconscious. The consequences were dramatic for Niels T.

    That’s fine,just seemed like you were and I’m fed up on the stabbing cases recently where it’s not the killer’s fault or the parents it’s the governments,until those closer to home start talking the blame and do gooders stop looking for excuses the better the world will be 

    • Like 9
  9. 13 minutes ago, spudski said:

    You're guessing and presuming...it might have been right where he was stood. And we don't even know whether the guy who was injured did the same thing. Like I said, you only hear one side when they are seriously injured. 

    You do know the difference between a rock and stone as you keep calling it 

    • Like 1
  10. 2 minutes ago, spudski said:

    You're guessing and presuming...it might have been right where he was stood. And we don't even know whether the guy who was injured did the same thing. Like I said, you only hear one side when they are seriously injured. 

    Exactly as you are guessing and presuming,from reading the report the bloke was on his own while the pebble smasher was with his mates 

  11. 5 minutes ago, spudski said:

    It's not a ridiculous comment...you've just misunderstood the post. 

    You'd go to prison if you punched someone and broke their skull, or they fell and broke their skull. Or even worse died from their injuries.

    The fine margin is the outcome. 

    Blimey...I remember being pelted with stones at the Ninian Park car park, both sets lobbing em. 

    But that was considered high jinx back then. 

     

    You are correct but red mist is throwing a punch off the cuff,I’m guessing he went looking for a brick/stone unless he carries them Willy nilly in his back pocket,if the incident happened in a quarry of course 

  12. 2 hours ago, spudski said:

    Just goes to show how lucky or unlucky you can be in an altercation.

    He's hit him with a stone...I bet he wouldn't have intended to break his skull.

    Yet you can punch an opposition fan and push him down the Dolman steps...and he survives any damage...yet could end so differently. 

    Small margins in heated red mist. 

    A fist fight is totally different than using a knife or in this case brick/stone,what a ridiculous comment 

  13. 7 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

    A timing thing too, this predated Bristol Sport by some way.

    Bloom and his team pushed them on incredibly. The Ashton Vale debacle did perhaps stall our development.

    Very much true but regarding the football side we would have still not have got the right people in I fear 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...