ORANGE500

I think city will score 3 today hopefully a couple from Conway as apert from the Rotherham game he hasn't really shown much this seson so far.

Then why keep going over it again and again. Who really cares in fact one person I highly doubt gives a stuff whether his photo is included or not and that's Nigel Pearson he's probably moved on like some on this forum should.

Doesn't play for city anymore so don't really care

Wow there is somebody else who has noticed thet City are playing some decent stuff but sadly are constantly missing chances which are being created far more than previously, every game the shots on goal are in double figures if we had taken just half of those chances Southampton Norwich and Blackburn would not have been losses. Things are not remotely as grim as some would like to suggest or dare I say want them to be.

Needs to have the other 2/3's cut and let it sink. Going to ASDA later but happy to pay Tesco and Sainsbury's etc as well because i'm using the services of a grocery store so must pay for them as well completely fair and just.Trying to think of anything else you don't use but still have to pay for or more accurately forced to pay for.

It maybe difficult for you I understand but stop being an idiut if at all possible

They are the most fickle and negative fans anywhere. One person has just posted( and there are many more similat posts as you've probably seen)we've got no attack so the defence will have to keep us from avoiding relegation. That's after 1 game under a new manager and about a month ago after Rotherham they were regarding Tommy Conway as the next Alan Shearer. As I said the worst sometimes wonder why they bother.

I've always believed it and nothing they say or do suggest othersise, they are the worst fans anywhere.

It's 1 game under a coach who arrived 4 days ago and has taken 2 or 3 training sessions that's what a sensible person without an agenda would conclude.sadly this forum is lacking that type so it's no surprise to see the ridiculous comments posted on here.

Just liike your negativity can always guarantee it

Why?

Give it a rest and move on they obviously didn't have confidence in Nigel Pearson to progress the team beyond mid-table and given the performances and results over the last 3 years that's not an outlandish conclusion.

I think he had a budget higher than a lot of teams in the division

Nigel took us to middle of the road

The performance against Leicester this season was shocking like frightened little boys. The facts are City finished 17th & 14th under Nigel Pearson the football was mediocre most of the time and given the way the team have played agaiin so far(even without the injuries) this seaon the likelihood would have been a similiar league finish.I wish him well but the e reaction over the last week is simply ridiculous and is not IMO about Nigel Pearson particularly as the reality does not suggest the last 3 years was anything but mediocre the perfect word to describe Nigel's tenure.

The home form has been pretty dreadful and we seldom compete against the teams at the top be it Leicester this season or Burnley last season the tactic is park the bus and keep the score down.We do not and haven't looked like a team that are genuinely going to be in and around the top 6 during the last 3 years.

Progression? The performances by and large and certainly the results have been mediocre for 3 years.

So they couldn't have been all that enamoured with what they were watching during his tenure. Absolutely bizarre reaction over the last week.

Did they ever sing his name when he was manager?

Get over it Pearson's gone; today is just about on average what we've seen over the last almost 3 years. Wasn't great was it

Alex Scott was in the team for the last two seasons finished 17th and 14th currently 15th not too much difference.

From many of the comments on here over the last 48 Hrs you would think the club were replacing Sir Alex Ferguson let's get real it wasn't a catastrophe under Nigel Pearson but it was far from great mediocre would best describe the last almost 3 years.

In 20/21 you may recall the stadium was closed to the public therefore any revenue was severely reduced but the salaries which you would estimate run into £millions each month and the operating costs still have to be paid that may explain why the loses have ben so high quite logical really

In fact it was around £500,000 a week in 20/21 and who is it that funds that loss?

I've been following Bristol City since 1990 but unlike you I have no agenda I just support the club but I can acknowledge that the positive things the current ownership have done far outweigh the negative like bankrolling a business than loses £300,000 a week.