REDOXO

You are hilarious when your are drunk and angry

Mate. Go to bed! You’ve had enough!

Seriously! We are developing a team of kids from our own academy supported by a few senior professionals. Which was the task he was given, while getting the huge wages off the books and changing the culture. This team doesn’t know when it’s beaten and continues to find something. It’s not just about todays game is it!?

Original post ^^^ Really you think that’s over the top?

Or who is in our under 21s that can take an opportunity to at least get on the bench!

Time since our last penalty. 45 minutes! YEAH BABY!!

I want one provided one half says BRISTOL and the other half says CITY

I haven’t seen any of the QPR game, however my mate a season ticket holder at Rangers tells me they are in free fall and there is a real fear they will be in a relegation battle if something doesn’t change quickly. Sunderland are challenging and are decent and we will have to be at it to compete no doubt. However our ability to counter attack a team that plays with the high press is decent enough particularly if Wells Bell and Sykes play. The big miss is Naismith, who makes us look so much better when in midfield, but what are you going to do!? Someone else’s chance I guess. Looking forward to it. It’s a shame about the Wigan result as I reckon quite a few more would have gone.

It’s an interesting one. Ball retention v counter attacking intent. I would go with Bell from the start with Wells, but hey who knows. What is obvious is we have a good squad and players to come back. Exciting it is!

Sunderland will not be so intent on stopping us play, they need a win as much as we would like one. Wigan were very much on the draw is a good away result side. I expect Bell Wells and Sykes to start and us to continue on the counter attack away from home against a team that will be pushing forward. The wild cards are who will start out of Weimann the boy from Wigan and dare I say it Scott. We have a very decent squad now so take your pick in several positions. However I expect the back four and goalkeeper as you were plus James and Williams.

Wigan played well. They came to stop us playing through them by winning tackles and forcing us to go long. Wigan also did well to push our defense but really only had one chance that came from a scuffed free kick that alluded everyone. That’s life For our part, the new lad from Wycombe had a decent home debut, Cornick isn’t at it yet as a starter and Andy Weimann needs games. Pearson buys players that he sees can be developed and so far has a decent track record at that. I’m not sure what he sees in Cornick that can be developed but that’s a question for Mr Pearson, but be assured he does. But for the woodwork the poddy would be completely different and a lot less critical/I would have done. But there we are Sunderland don’t fancy us either right now so let’s see how they do on Saturday.

We did hit too many long balls. This was because we were unable to play through them and lost possession in the tackle 70% of the time. Thus we kept playing the ball sideways and backwards for James or Vyner to go long. Credit to Wigan. However That is why we bought the boy from Wycombe to actually unlock these sorts of teams and to be fair to him he supplied the cross for our goal and if I’m not mistaken hit the post.

Steve Jones. Tiny penis’ finest signing!

Wigan are fighting for their lives, a new manager and set out a game plan. We were given nothing and didn’t win the ball as much as we have recently. We’re we not as good as we have been recently, obviously yes, did we play at our usual tempo, obviously no! The Ideawe were poor that some have offered is in the context of how well we have played lately. Were we really poor, then you need to look at WBA, because that was poor! in this division almost anyone can beat anyone, which is why is so tight. Lots of other clubs will have similar games and results between now and the end of May Take the point and move on to Sunderland they certainly don’t want us right now!

Was I the only one alive in the 70s? Being charged at West Ham and being hit by debris at Aldershot etc etc etc etc. This kids on the pitch stuff all seems a bit 21st and a 1/4 century.

Oh Dear. That might make your eyes water ?

The poddy was good today @headhunter@Curr Avon et al. Listened to it while watching Man U. Ian is a lot more measured than the bad old days of his Pearson out rants. I like ?? it. As for ten wins from sixteen, I agree with Mr Gay. It is possible but the odds are against it. However as was stated last week we need to continue a run. Wigan will be up for it on Wednesday, but I’m hopeful we will have too much. If we subsequently get something from Sunderland then, just ? maybe!

I like Ian (and @Curr Avon) leaving the latter to one side, Ian despite everything IMO is a supporter who wants the best for the club and isn’t afraid to say what he thinks. Yes you may not agree with some of it and he does get over the top down when we loose but that’s what the off button is for. What I typically do is not listen to the poddy for a while during wrist slashing weeks, but always go back until the next time I have to leave it alone. Incidently Not sure why anyone would block @Davefevs on any media, the bloke is a rockstar on here. I just see him as a more measured and thoughtful version of Ian with a spreadsheet!

Unfortunately it’s a fact of life that the club were a mess and that had to be dealt with. Threads being hijacked, clearly you think so, but I’m not sure it’s the case, either way it’s a measure of where we were and where we are!

Assuming Tanner never gets injured of course.

It’s not ancient history though is it! We still have players on those eye watering wages and we have to sell players to mitigate that! it’s current history.

I think Bell ? himself would be gutted if he was on the bench on Wednesday. But it may or may not be a bad thing!

Yes I nearly wrote that myself. ?

I agree! Kids Need to stay off the pitch and the adult is responsible if they don’t! However I know nothing of the incident and make no judgement on the behavior of the stewarding, nevertheless if the parent makes the steward the defacto parent due to in attendance then they should behave appropriately!