Jump to content

RedRock

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    6018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RedRock

  1. Love the thread on ‘What Improvement Next’ - the OP listing the improvements to The Swamp under Wally.

    Bewildered how they’ve overlooked Santa’s Grotto,  the (assumed) part-finished pergola structure for their disabled supporters and the porch canopy over the stand entrance door, hailed as ‘Ground Improvement  of the Year 2017’.

     

  2. 1 hour ago, myol'man said:

    Not forgetting that we have a new Metrobus system with a gurt big flyover and a Ashton Gate stop*

     

     

    *not suitable for football supporters

    ** and won’t pick football supporters up at Cumberland Basin either.

    *** next attempt will be from Long Ashton P&R itself

     

    Truly pathetic local Council(s) - almost as if they are actively trying to encourage the use of private cars. 

    • Like 1
  3. 13 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

    No they didn’t they were 30 minutes away from bankruptcy then the deal was struck that avoided it

    ‘Watertight’ Sags don’t understand the concept of factual information.

    They much prefer to be provided with lies. Lies for them are the truth. They thrive off them.

    It’s how they’ve been bought up and why they’re the 6th richest Club on Planet Zog.

  4. 1 hour ago, Coombsy said:

    Just had a chat to  banksey 

    he said sorry for painting on the door

    and was only trying to help the club raise 63000 to keep them floating for a extra week 

    Think we need to start spreading the news about it being a Banksy work. 

    Someone will then come along and cut the door and shutters out.

    That’ll mean the attendances will go back up to where they were before they stopped the free entry scam, so The Sags can once again claim to be the best supported Club in Europe. Wally will also save on demolition costs meaning a 50,000 seat UWE stadium bordered by a camel race track and a few beds of cactus  is now a viable proposition. 

     

  5. 13 minutes ago, Porto Red said:

    ... which was clearly erected out of pure spite and desperation to block the view of the pitch from the house opposite (thereby inadvertently adding thousands to its value) and force the occupants to buy tickets should they inexplicably want to see the shitfest being served up on the other side.

    I heard the local residents themselves paid for it to obscure views of the ‘stadium’.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
  6. 3 hours ago, simon uk said:

    Thats quite the design statement!

    Well, given there’s a garden shed, close boarded wooden fence and a converted shipping container in the background, I’d have to agree with you.

    Pushing design boundaries for football stadia. 

    Nothing Ragbag about that Club. 

     

     

  7. Wow! This is our ‘reward’ for the thread reaching 900 pages.

    Looking forward to the 1000th Page prize. Wonder what that could be? Here’s hoping.

     

    Thought Darrell was a decent fit for The Gas personally. Rewinding a couple of years they had a decent manager, advanced plans for a quality stadium at UWE that made good commercial sense and a new training ground - must admit to being a bit nervous then. But.... can always trust The Slags to mess things up. Happy days.

     

     

  8. 35 minutes ago, Midlands Robin said:

    If I was a betting man, I'd bet that when the squatters originally agreed their awesome new stand upgrades with the council and the sag, they agreed to apply for planning permission within 28 days of the original installation date. However, when installation was delayed due to the Tipplewell Primary School sports day still using the stands, the original date slipped and no one remembered to update the agreement. Therefore, the 28 days countdown had already started even though the structures were not up. So, when they do get the things up and open they now definitely need planning permission as they no longer qualify as temporary.

    Just a guess though.

    Good job you’re not a betting man! The 28 day rule is not relevant to this issue.

    Indeed, having made a quick check of the General Development Order I’m struggling to find any clause that would exempt them from the need to apply for planning permission. 

    Pity ?

     

    • Thanks 1
  9. 1 hour ago, Wanderingred said:

    I think the council have got this one wrong, rather than the sags. They've clearly said that they've been liasing for months with them about this but have never warned them about this? The law on temporary structures isn't rocket science  but there are some right dullards working for BCC - And I should know as I used to be one of them! So yeah, not really the sags fault here. Still funny as #### though!!!

    Now I’ve been out of the planning system for a few years. I know successive Governments have relaxed permitted development rights. 

    I’d be surprised though if you could argue the erection of structures of the scale of a stand for an undefined period - i.e. until you could afford to replace them or move to another site - would fall within the definition of ‘permittted development’.

    At the very least, I would have advised to formally ask the question of the planning department and building regs as to whether approvals would be required. Would be staggered if they didn’t do that. 

  10. Pretty sure they must have used the same ‘water tight’ consultants on this issue as Sainsbury’s. 

    Absolute classic. We’ve been liasing with Bristol City Council via SAG with a planning committee MEMBER on it. Did it not occur to The Slags that a Member often knows diddly squat about the intricacies of the Planning and Building Regs Systems?

    Using their logic, I could go up to the tea lady at The Cabbage Patch and ask her about the project plan for their training ground. Whatever she says will be gospel.

     

    • Like 1
  11. Just now, Super said:

    Do you need planning permission when wheeling in a new stand?

    That’s a good question. The need for planning permission for shepherds huts (with wheels) caused much debate in the planning profession. What you do is keep moving the structure around your landholding.

    The SAGS  could fit wheels on these tents and then tow them around Bristol for use at dog shows and the like, returning them to The Mammary every other Saturday. 

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...