Nogbad the Bad Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Not the bees knees, just significanvetted tree than anything else we have got. Proof that you talk gobbledegook when it comes to Maynard, Jordan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee63 Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Useless....can it get any worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Maynard prem class my arse, what's that, 6 goals this season and can't score against Crawley town? No argument about service, Billy Sharp scores for fun in a side worse than us, can't wait for NM to be gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoner_1990 Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 waste of money!shit travel home! city were shocking thats being nice to be fair! maynard did himself no.favours trying to earn a prem move terrible shooting! woolford is possibly one of the.worst players at the club! and kilkenny is he lee johnson in diguise?mcinnes needs more then one or two players if were gunna stay up based on that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laner Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 no surprise. Same rubbish year in year out! We might end up playing Crawley again next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Otib in lambasting individuals despite not being there shocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REBS14 Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 People blaming maynard and others saying dont blame him, poor service etc - maynard is a striker and strikers are paid to score, two chances two misses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 People blaming maynard and others saying dont blame him, poor service etc - maynard is a striker and strikers are paid to score, two chances two misses Did you see either of those chances? Maybe my memory deceives me but it was analysed as 'from a bad angle' which 'needed someone to tuck in at the far post'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve39 Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 <br />Useless....can it get any worse.<br /><br /><br /><br /> Rovers could beat villa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Otib in lambasting individuals despite not being there shocker. BB from the ground is being far more damning of our players than anyone on here. 'Quality, absolute zero'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlanta_Red Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Didnt sound like it on the radio? Were you there? Yes. Flying back to Atlanta right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 BB from the ground is being far more damning of our players than anyone on here. 'Quality, absolute zero'. Funny that he was almost defensive towards Maynards only minutes after he was sent up as a witch in this thread. Great coincidence how someone who actually watches the game has a different opinion to those who listened to a local radio reporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pederho ll Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 We just seem to have the same problems year after year and year after year we play largely the same players. This ain't rocket science, things need to change and fast because this squad of players are not up to Championship standard. The mire l think about it, we would be far better off without Maynard. At the moment there is effectively no competition for his place in Del's eyes and it has become very very unhealthy for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REBS14 Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Did you see either of those chances? Maybe my memory deceives me but it was analysed as 'from a bad angle' which 'needed someone to tuck in at the far post'. fair point - i can only comment on what i heard on radio Briz, but to me he does miss those chances you feel he should score, a quality striker makes you feel confident, IMO maynard does not give me that buzz, chances are going to be harder to put away in the permiership, he isnt good enough, again my honest opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Did you see either of those chances? Maybe my memory deceives me but it was analysed as 'from a bad angle' which 'needed someone to tuck in at the far post'. Can only go from the commentary. The first was set up on a plate by Albert, close in and he couldn't even get it on target. The second one, as you describe, sounded more difficult but no excuses for failing to score the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobby the red Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Fair result but stood behind the goal I dont remember two sitters were you watching on the radio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Can only go from the commentary. The first was set up on a plate by Albert, close in and he couldn't even get it on target. The second one, as you describe, sounded more difficult but no excuses for failing to score the first. Yup, that's what it sounded like. But the situation raises its head time and time again. "Such and such had a shit game." "Oh right, you were there then?" "Nah mate, listened on the radio." A credible argument if ever there was one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Otib in lambasting individuals despite not being there shocker. Four eyes have reported to us on line from the ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Funny that he was almost defensive towards Maynards only minutes after he was sent up as a witch in this thread. Great coincidence how someone who actually watches the game has a different opinion to those who listened to a local radio reporter. Yes, but let's all just accept that Maynard had one exceptionally good chance that he should certainly have scored and he failed to even test the keeper. I don't think BB defended that miss at all, more the fact Maynard was up front on his own and City were pumping long balls. He would have preferred Stead, or even Nyatanga up front, more chance of winning headers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Tansley Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Proof that you talk gobbledegook when it comes to Maynard, Jordan. Bloody technology! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 The 2nd chance maynard had was not a sitter for me as on weak foot under pressure from keeper. Also they had 2 on the line so it had to be special to go in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviestevieneville Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 I don't understand why Stead doesn't get a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 BRING ON BRIGHTON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchay Red Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 We are certainly missing Marv. Can't be any coincidence that the woeful performances in the last two games have occured since he went off injured. He may run around like headless chicken at times, but he fights for everything and gets stuck in, in midfield where it counts. Hope he's back soon, we need him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 He would have preferred Stead, or even Nyatanga up front, more chance of winning headers. That is, once again, our 4-5-1 falling apart when we don't play the ball on the floor and leave Maynard isolated. He's not having a great time of it, but he's being singled out when the team and others who aren't performing (Adomah was poor on Tuesday and just as bad today by the sounds of it) escape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 He's not having a great time of it, but he's being singled out when the team and others who aren't performing (Adomah was poor on Tuesday and just as bad today by the sounds of it) escape. Nevertheless Maynard is there to take chances when they come, and an exceptionally good one came his way today. Sounds like he definitely should have netted that first half sitter which would have changed the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangers Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Maynard missed a decent chance but it wasn't a sitter by any means...... Not suprised he wants to leave. He worked hard today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketh2nd Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Nevertheless Maynard is there to take chances when they come, and an exceptionally good one came his way today. Sounds like he definitely should have netted that first half sitter which would have changed the game. so damn easy to say this in hindsight and the fact that if pitman had started and missed the shame chance you would of say give him more time to give him match sharpness. As said on the maynard thread we are relying much too heavily on just the strikers scoring whether this be Maynard or pitman if he starts. As soon as I saw Skuse starting I had this bad feeling about the game as much as I like the guy and want him to do well I just don't think he's good enough for this level or with Pearson and Kilkenny as a midfield 3. It was refreshing to see Mcinnes to go with amore attacking minded midfield but without cisse playing sweeper or Elliot running at the opposition our midfield just isn't good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 so damn easy to say this in hindsight and the fact that if pitman had started and missed the shame chance you would of say give him more time to give him match sharpness. As said on the maynard thread we are relying much too heavily on just the strikers scoring whether this be Maynard or pitman if he starts. To say Maynard should definitely have scored (according to the commentary) and that a goal then would have changed the game is hardly talking in hindsight Mike. And yes, I hope fans will be patient with Pitman if he should miss similar chances - why not, when there has been so much patience and understanding towards NM through repeated, and protracted non scoring runs when good chances have been created for him and he has failed to take them so often? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beaverface Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 so damn easy to say this in hindsight and the fact that if pitman had started and missed the shame chance you would of say give him more time to give him match sharpness. As said on the maynard thread we are relying much too heavily on just the strikers scoring whether this be Maynard or pitman if he starts. As soon as I saw Skuse starting I had this bad feeling about the game as much as I like the guy and want him to do well I just don't think he's good enough for this level or with Pearson and Kilkenny as a midfield 3. It was refreshing to see Mcinnes to go with amore attacking minded midfield but without cisse playing sweeper or Elliot running at the opposition our midfield just isn't good enough. What League 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.