glynriley Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 I hope Hodgeson doesn't get the job. Poor at Liverpool and that was his big chance. Done well at Fulham and WBA, but McClaren done well at Boro, look how that turned out. Surprised Pardew hasn't been mentioned, only English manager who is managing a top 4 team!! That would be Harry Redknapp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 At last, some sense from the FA. Shame he won't be given a chance by the tabloids though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Derek has achieved nothing yet in his career. Would be a huge risk for WBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screech Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 At last, some sense from the FA. Shame he won't be given a chance by the tabloids though Exactly, you can already hear them digging around for some shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!james Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Search McInnes on twitter and already WBA fans are putting his name forward for the job... Would be a massive gamble if they did, I would be more worried if they were going down this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tins Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 That would be Harry Redknapp. My mistake, saw the league before the Spurs game. But still very impressive at Newcastle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordy62 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 My vote goes to El Tel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 I hope Hodgeson doesn't get the job. Poor at Liverpool and that was his big chance. Done well at Fulham and WBA, but McClaren done well at Boro, look how that turned out. Surprised Pardew hasn't been mentioned, only English manager who is managing a top 4 team!! Is that the same Roy hodgson who has a lot of experience at managing international teams, the same Roy hodgson that got Switzerland, yes Switzerland, ranked no 3 in the world at one point. Sorry, you cannot judge a manager on a few months at Liverpool, he had no time to do anything, outperformed king kenny who spent 70 million on players and are not even close to European qualification. Roy hodgson is a lot more than what he has achieved in England. If people cannot look past what he has done at Liverpool or Blackburn, then they must be blinkered. Roy has a excellent record if you take time to see what he has done. Far better than redknapp and co combined. I am failing to see redknapp et al manage a top top club or international side in their career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Search McInnes on twitter and already WBA fans are putting his name forward for the job... Would be a massive gamble if they did, I would be more worried if they were going down this season Well if west brom come sniffing hopefully we will tell them where to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i hate you butler Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Ahh got ya. Gotta be redknapp, he'll tear Europe a new a hole with his brand of football. Hodgson is dogdoo Ahh got ya. Gotta be redknapp, he'll tear Europe a new a hole with his brand of football. Hodgson is dogdoo imbecile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Is that the same Roy hodgson who has a lot of experience at managing international teams, the same Roy hodgson that got Switzerland, yes Switzerland, ranked no 3 in the world at one point. Sorry, you cannot judge a manager on a few months at Liverpool, he had no time to do anything, outperformed king kenny who spent 70 million on players and are not even close to European qualification. Roy hodgson is a lot more than what he has achieved in England. If people cannot look past what he has done at Liverpool or Blackburn, then they must be blinkered. Roy has a excellent record if you take time to see what he has done. Far better than redknapp and co combined. I am failing to see redknapp et al manage a top top club or international side in their career. Really?? Liverpool would of finished in the bottom half if Woy would of carried on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmissionImpossible Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 The FA didn't have many choices. Hodgon seems the sensible option. Redknapp would have been another Keegan disaster. Anyway, who gives a ****. Our players simply aren't good enough to go any distance in the Euros. Guardiola? Seriously? He has managed the best team in the world with the best players in the world in his only job ever and he needs a rest from football. I don' blame him. Realistically our/Englands aim has to be reaching the Q Finals and out of the candidates, Hodgson is the only man I can see doing that with the players available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastonboy Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 imbocile Whooooossshhhhh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 I hope Hodgeson doesn't get the job. Poor at Liverpool and that was his big chance. Done well at Fulham and WBA, but McClaren done well at Boro, look how that turned out. Surprised Pardew hasn't been mentioned, only English manager who is managing a top 4 team!! Pardew ruled himself out (sensibly) due to inexperience. Re Liverpool it's a small blot on a long and very successful career. This man took Switzerland to world cups and euros for the first time in 35 years, and has fantastic records. Very successful in the Swedish leagues, took Inter from mid table to 3rd in serie A, took Blackburn from relegation fodder to UEFA cup in first season, then there is Fulham and West Brom too. Granted some jobs turned sour (Blackburn - but there were injuries) his record is one that befits a top manager. I certainly would pick him over any of the other realistic candidates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordy62 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Is that the same Roy hodgson who has a lot of experience at managing international teams, the same Roy hodgson that got Switzerland, yes Switzerland, ranked no 3 in the world at one point. Really? Really? I'm not saying I don't believe you, but I find this very hard to believe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 imbecile ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Tansley Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Is that the same Roy hodgson who has a lot of experience at managing international teams, the same Roy hodgson that got Switzerland, yes Switzerland, ranked no 3 in the world at one point. Sorry, you cannot judge a manager on a few months at Liverpool, he had no time to do anything, outperformed king kenny who spent 70 million on players and are not even close to European qualification. Roy hodgson is a lot more than what he has achieved in England. If people cannot look past what he has done at Liverpool or Blackburn, then they must be blinkered. Roy has a excellent record if you take time to see what he has done. Far better than redknapp and co combined. I am failing to see redknapp et al manage a top top club or international side in their career. With respect, liverpool are in Europe next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Surely its got to be Redknapp? All the players want Rednapp, the media want him... I'll give up if Woy is in charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Really?? Liverpool would of finished in the bottom half if Woy would of carried on. well I am dealing with fact, you have just put a guess across. You have no idea where Liverpool would have finished if Roy had stayed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tins Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Is that the same Roy hodgson who has a lot of experience at managing international teams, the same Roy hodgson that got Switzerland, yes Switzerland, ranked no 3 in the world at one point. Sorry, you cannot judge a manager on a few months at Liverpool, he had no time to do anything, outperformed king kenny who spent 70 million on players and are not even close to European qualification. Roy hodgson is a lot more than what he has achieved in England. If people cannot look past what he has done at Liverpool or Blackburn, then they must be blinkered. Roy has a excellent record if you take time to see what he has done. Far better than redknapp and co combined. I am failing to see redknapp et al manage a top top club or international side in their career. Yes he done well at Switzerland, but he also left them just before Euro 96, and that was over 16 years ago now!!!!! Wasn't liked at Inter (a big team), failed at Blackburn (another big team at that time) and most recently failed at Liverpool! Yes he didn't spend as much as King Kenny, but Kenny has been awful!!!! The point is he still failed, and brought in many of his own players who flopped there. He also managed Finland and had a 27.3% win ratio, one of the worst in Finnish manager history. He has failed in most of his big jobs, however is great at managing teams with low expectations, unlike England who have massive expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 If i had my way it would be Hoddle But got no problem with Hodgeson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Surely its got to be Redknapp? All the players want Rednapp, the media want him... I'll give up if Woy is in charge. The media want him, so will cloud every other option. Why will you give up, he's actually managed international teams and done well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pewsham Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Really?? Liverpool would of finished in the bottom half if Woy would of carried on. Liverpool were in a bad spin at the time. The new owners still owners still hadn't arrived, and the old ones weren't gonna spend any money and seemed content to hang on to what they had. I can't really blame Liverpool's poor position on Roy - he didn't have Millions to spend - Dalglish did and Liverpool are still currently only 3 points better off than Roy's West Brom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 With respect, liverpool are in Europe next season. my bad I should have stipulated champions league. The way the Europa league is treated by the English, I doubt they want to be in it anyway. Apart from not stipulating champions league, is there anything else I have stated you want to take apart. Ps you may have upset someone, you used "with greatest respect" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Liverpool were in a bad spin at the time. The new owners still owners still hadn't arrived, and the old ones weren't gonna spend any money and seemed content to hang on to what they had. I can't really blame Liverpool's poor position on Roy - he didn't have Millions to spend - Dalglish did and Liverpool are still currently only 3 points better off than Roy's West Brom He brought in Konchesky and Poulsen without doubt two of the worst players ever to play for Liverpool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Yes he done well at Switzerland, but he also left them just before Euro 96, and that was over 16 years ago now!!!!! Wasn't liked at Inter (a big team), failed at Blackburn (another big team at that time) and most recently failed at Liverpool! Yes he didn't spend as much as King Kenny, but Kenny has been awful!!!! The point is he still failed, and brought in many of his own players who flopped there. He also managed Finland and had a 27.3% win ratio, one of the worst in Finnish manager history. He has failed in most of his big jobs, however is great at managing teams with low expectations, unlike England who have massive expectations. Okay I'll take your points. What have the other hopefuls ever done to warrant the job? What experience have they ever had in Europe, let alone international level? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only way is up.... Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 The FA didn't have many choices. Hodgon seems the sensible option. Redknapp would have been another Keegan disaster. Anyway, who gives a ****. Our players simply aren't good enough to go any distance in the Euros. Guardiola? Seriously? He has managed the best team in the world with the best players in the world in his only job ever and he needs a rest from football. I don' blame him. Realistically our/Englands aim has to be reaching the Q Finals and out of the candidates, Hodgson is the only man I can see doing that with the players available. Pretty much agree with all of this. Basically we do not have no where near enough quality to win the Euros. If anyone can squeeze the best out of a poor squad it will definately be Roy H - wish him all the best if he takes it and believe if we get to the QFs then we have done as good as we can expect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 He also managed Finland and had a 27.3% win ratio, one of the worst in Finnish manager history. Yes, but let's not forget when it mattered (in qualification) his record was actually pretty damn good and the Finns wanted to extend his contract!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glynriley Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Yes he done well at Switzerland, but he also left them just before Euro 96, and that was over 16 years ago now!!!!! Wasn't liked at Inter (a big team), failed at Blackburn (another big team at that time) and most recently failed at Liverpool! Yes he didn't spend as much as King Kenny, but Kenny has been awful!!!! The point is he still failed, and brought in many of his own players who flopped there. He also managed Finland and had a 27.3% win ratio, one of the worst in Finnish manager history. He has failed in most of his big jobs, however is great at managing teams with low expectations, unlike England who have massive expectations. His win ratio may have been poor but he only lost 5 of 22 matches and managed them to 33rd in the world rankings , their highest ever placing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy082005 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 His dismal effort at Liverpool springs to mind Not really any worse then "King Kennys" dismal attempt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.