ziderhead2003 Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 christ robbo you certainly got a good conversation going. (didnt think it would end up with this much interest)................ Come on you reds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 sorry but i dont.i haven't started a thread in ages.i just add to them. I'm not even going to start naming names on here but I'm sure I'm not the culprit. with respect luke,look at some of the 'pointless' posts,you will see that they are not started by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipps Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 I think Luke may be reffering to the the "one word replies", that there pointless, just to get post's up (or that's what it looks like). eg: replying to a thread with "sorry, don't know" etc. :Confused13: Rather than you being the culprit of starting pointless threads, you do seem to add to threads with fairly pointless responses Not having ago at you Ricky, but just trying to explain how I see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chalky Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 I think Luke may be reffering to the the "one word replies", that there pointless, just to get post's up (or that's what it looks like). eg: replying to a thread with "sorry, don't know" etc. :Confused13: Rather than you being the culprit of starting pointless threads, you do seem to add to threads with fairly pointless responses Not having ago at you Ricky, but just trying to explain how I see it I can see where you are coming from tipps but he never starts any threads like he says. But he also has never siad "no, sorry don't know" as a reply to a question either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukejones2 Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 sorry but i dont.i haven't started a thread in ages.i just add to them. Indeed this is what I was referring to. The addition of irrelevant comments or unneccessary comments to existing posts. On browsing the forum I regularly see your posts as irritating and pointless, this is just my opinion and I feel that this thread actually includes a couple of culprits. Far be it from me to criticise you for it but you express your dissatisfaction at such posts yourself, I would just ask that you consider the comments you make for worth prior to replying.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 so suddenly this thread is mainly about me is it,as I'm the main culprit!!??I'm was just saying that i dislike the fact that some forum members think that this forum should be banned to under eighteens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x3widRacin Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 so suddenly this thread is mainly about me is it,as I'm the main culprit!!??I'm was just saying that i dislike the fact that some forum members think that this forum should be banned to under eighteens. Don't get all riled up Ricky, It's not that the thread is focused on you, just so happened you posted something from the view of someone "not included" in the grasp of what the thread is aiming for, and someone noticed and stood up just to say they felt you, as well as the many many others, should possibly be included in this group. The only reason it is STILL about you, is because you've kept it about you here. If you wanted to take what you feel is unjustified attention away from yourself here, why don't you try contacting luke outside of the forum, and resolving things there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky BCFC Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 I agree about the thing where people post questions or whatever, and then people reply with "Dunno" or "No idea". Those are the most pointless responses to threads. There is no rule saying you HAVE to reply to each thread you read, so if you don't know the answer to something, just leave it to someone who does know. I don't bothere to read the names of the people who do this, but if you're one of those people and you're reading this, please stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 NO I'm NOT! i would rather heard out what luke has to say on the forum and resolve it in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukejones2 Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 NO I'm NOT! i would rather heard out what luke has to say on the forum and resolve it in here. You have read what I have to say, it is up to you if you choose to take it on board or otherwise. I will reitterate that the main "request" I have made is that posts are thought about before being made to ensure that they add value. If this is something you do which is what yuo appear to be saying then it is obviously some form of forum personality clash and there is no resolution. I am not attacking you in any way, just thought I'd point out that I consider your posts to sometimes fall into the catgory discussed. May I suggest that this is left here as it is unfair to use this post for a specific discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 I am not attacking you in any way, just thought I'd point out that I consider your posts to sometimes fall into the catgory discussed. yeah I'm sure some of my posts don't meet your standards,and I'm sorry for that. and i will admit sometimes,yeah,i don't think about the topic said long enough,but i don't just post any old ####. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myoudale Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 i would say there more 18 and under than there are 18 and older we are they future supporters of the club we should be able to have our say when we wont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newboy Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 Why don't we just have a voluntary code of conduct? For example: - NO TYPING IN CAPS FOR THE ENTIRE MESSAGE - no massively sized signatures - no phone txt msgs style wrtng - no utterly pointless responses such as "yeah. agree" - no personal abuse (hey c'mon guys, we're on the same side here) I'm sure there's some more we could add without turning it into a police state.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 i would say there more 18 and under than there are 18 and older we are they future supporters of the club we should be able to have our say when we wont sorry, but that is completely beyond my understanding - anyone translate for me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 :how funny: i think he is saying ' i think there are more under eighteens than over eighteens.we are the future supporters and we should be able to have our say,when we want it' i think that is what he is trying to say... :Confused13: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chalky Posted November 24, 2003 Report Share Posted November 24, 2003 Yeah that is what he is trying too say but i recon he is not right. There are more younger contributors but there are hindreds of people who just sign up but never post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Posted November 24, 2003 Report Share Posted November 24, 2003 Why don't we just have a voluntary code of conduct? For example: - NO TYPING IN CAPS FOR THE ENTIRE MESSAGE - no massively sized signatures - no phone txt msgs style wrtng - no utterly pointless responses such as "yeah. agree" - no personal abuse (hey c'mon guys, we're on the same side here) Good idea. Can I add to this "accept different opinions and debate the point". I know this appears obvious comment, after all this is a fourm. I'll try and clarify:- I have noticed that (especially after a victory), a comment about a particular player, D.W. or anybody is sometimes met with a comment along the lines of "it's Danny's turn again is it" or "can't please some people" etc. These type of comments all too often end a debate stone dead. I have seen a lot of good points never commented on after this type of comment has been made. People should debate the point along the lines of "I disagree because..." or "bit harsh that, Danny ....." I would say if you can add nothing but a snide comment at the post, don't bother adding anything and let those who want to debate the point, do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rule The Waves Posted November 26, 2003 Report Share Posted November 26, 2003 He started it.....no you started it. What a load of :PC_Plod: This is an OPEN FORUM. Anyone who wants to post on it should be allowed to, even if they do talk :PC_Plod: thats what makes it interesting. And anyway, if someone does post :PC_Plod: everyone else can take the mick out of them :sport5: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.