Jump to content
IGNORED

World Cup 2022 thread (football only)


Super

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Lovely header.

Why aren’t we giving Ecuador any credit, got some bloody good players…and are showing the “gulf” in class.

Ecuador aren’t mugs, no doubt about it, but will fall short against the first quality side they meet imo. However they are leagues above the opposition they are playing….who must rank as one of the weakest sides I’ve ever seen at a World Cup. Waste of a place tbh.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Plus dangerous 2nd tier like Colombia, Peru, Paraguay- Uruguay somewhere between the two. Bolivia and Venezuela have European based players too. There aren't really any 'whipping boys' in the South American zone.

 Venezuela seem traditionally to be the weakest South American team. No obvious reason why though. Eight times the population of Uruguay.

Edited by The Gasbuster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

When the ball was kicked?

No, when the attacker and keeper attacked the ball, the attacker got the last touch, the Ecuador player who played it next was in an offside position. No conspiracies, just var that most on here wanted… before they all realised it would spoil the game!.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Portland Bill said:

No, when the attacker and keeper attacked the ball, the attacker got the last touch, the Ecuador player who played it next was in an offside position. No conspiracies, just var that most on here wanted… before they all realised it would spoil the game!.

Can’t argue with your last comment that’s for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Gasbuster said:

 Venezuela seem traditionally to be the weakest South American team. No obvious reason why though. Eight times the population of Uruguay.

Weakest yeah but not necessarily an easy away game- compare to San Marino, Andorra, Gibraltar etc. I'd fancy a number of the weaker South American sides v Latvia, Lithuania and so on too.

Bolivia and Ecuador were skewed a bit by altitude.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr Popodopolous said:

Weakest yeah but not necessarily an easy away game- compare to San Marino, Andorra, Gibraltar etc. I'd fancy a number of the weaker South American sides v Latvia, Lithuania and so on too.

Bolivia and Ecuador were skewed a bit by altitude.

it tends to go in cycles in South America. With the exception of Brazil, Argentina and possibly Uruguay the others seem to have times in the sun and then turn to crap for a while. Chile are the prime example and it normally comes down to whether they have three or four world class players at any given time or don`t.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

it tends to go in cycles in South America. With the exception of Brazil, Argentina and possibly Uruguay the others seem to have times in the sun and then turn to crap for a while. Chile are the prime example and it normally comes down to whether they have three or four world class players at any given time or don`t.

I forgot about Chile. Agreed on your post but it's definitely a challenging zone even at times for the big 2, less so than it used to be- Chile aren't a walkover in the main even if in a lesser generation of players.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, redkev said:

Love this to be 6 or 7 nil stick it right up fifa ass 

What difference does it make, USA,South Africa and Russia have all recently held World Cups, none of those three had any chance of doing well.
Qatar and their neighbours run European football with their money nowadays. The last 8 of the Champions league will probably be all teams with oil cash backing them.

FIFA and UEFA don’t care if Qatar lose by 10, but fans of football should question why they hate the World Cup venue, but dote over the champions league!. The cash comes from the same places.

  • Like 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Harry said:

I’d confidently say, that if a Gloucestershire County team was able to train full time, over a number of years, by coaches from Barcelona, that they’d be a better team than these Qatari’s. 

The striker is appalling.  Stood offside all the time. Giving his team mates nothing to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Portland Bill said:

What difference does it make, USA,South Africa and Russia have all recently held World Cups, none of those three had any chance of doing well.
Qatar and their neighbours run European football with their money nowadays. The last 8 of the Champions league will probably be all teams with oil cash backing them.

FIFA and UEFA don’t care if Qatar lose by 10, but fans of football should question why they hate the World Cup venue, but dote over the champions league!. The cash comes from the same places.

Well that told me ,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...